Review published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 31:4 (2014) ► pp. 579583
References
Chambers, J. K.
2003Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance, 265–278. Malden and Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. & Trudgill Peter
1998Dialectology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Goebl, Hans & Schiltz Guillaume
1997A dialectometrical compilation of CLAE 1 and CLAE 2: Isoglosses and dialect integration. In Wolfgang Viereck & Heinrich Ramisch (eds.), Computer developed linguistic atlas of England 9CLAE, vol. 21, 13–21. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
2003Modality on the move: The English modal auxiliaries 1961–1992. In Roberta Facchinetti, Manfred Krug & Frank Palmer (eds.), Modality in contemporary English, 223–240. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A., Mercedes Durham & Jennifer Smith
2014Grammaticalization at an early stage: Future ‘be going to’ in conservative British dialects. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 75–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Smith Jennifer
2006Layering, change and a twist of fate: Deontic modality in dialects of English. Diachronica 23(2). 341–380. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J.
1974Linguistic change and diffusion: Description and explanation in sociolinguistic dialect geography. Language in Society 31. 215–246. CrossrefGoogle Scholar