Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp. 186230
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity [Typological Studies in Language, 127], Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne, Kristin Bech, Gerlof Bouma, Kristine Eide, Dag Haug, Odd Einar Haugen & Marius Jøhndal
2018. The PROIEL treebank family: a standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages. Language Resources and Evaluation 52:1  pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2018. A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives. Diachronica 35:3  pp. 338 ff. Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2020.  In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113],  pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Gvozdanovic, Jadranka
2019.  In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348],  pp. 302 ff. Crossref logo
Kotin, Michail L.
2020.  In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352],  pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
Olsson, Gustaf
2018. The Formation of Aspectual Pairs of Borrowed ova-verbs in Russian. Scando-Slavica 64:2  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
Plungjan, Vladimir A.
2017.  In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39],  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Szymański, Leszek
2019. The semantic field of the English modal auxiliary can interacting with the grammatical aspect of the main verb in Contemporary American English. Brno studies in English :1  pp. [75] ff. Crossref logo
Wiemer, Björn
2017.  In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39],  pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Amse-De Jong, Tine H.
1974The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Andersen, Henning
2006Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23(2). 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bary, Corien & Dag Trygve Truslew Haug
2011Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles. Semantics and Pragmatics 4(8). 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermel, Neil
1997Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect (University of California Publications in Linguistics 129). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Mary Swift
2004Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 27. 263–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring sense, volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borodič, Vera Vladimirovna
1953K voprosu o formirovanii soveršennogo i nesoveršennogo vida v slavjanskix jazykax. Voprosy jazykoznanija 6. 68–86.Google Scholar
Bronckart, Jean-Paul & Hermina Sinclair
1973Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 2. 107–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl
1989The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1).51–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capaldo, Mario
1985O nedostatkax i novšestvax novogo izdanija Suprasl’skogo sbornika. Polata Knigopisnaia: An Information Bulletin Devoted to the Study of Early Slavic Books, Texts and Literatures 13. 29–43.Google Scholar
Cejtlin, Ralja Michajlovna, Radoslav Večerka & Emilija Blagova
1994Staroslavjanskij slovar’ (po rukopisjam X–XI vekov). Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2010Time, tense and aspect in Early Vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Studies in Indo-European Languages and Linguistics 5). Leiden: Brill. Crossref
Dahl, Östen
. Tense and aspect systems 1985 Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darden, Bill
2004A history of the East Slavic imperfect. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies. http://​www​.billdarden​.com​/papers​/darden​_2004​_eslav​_imperf​.pdf
Dostál, Antonin
1954Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne & Laura Janda
2014Grammatical profiles and aspect in Old Church Slavonic. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1959Syntaxe latine, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.
Forsyth, James
1972The nature and development of the aspectual opposition in the Russian verb. The Slavonic and East European Review 50(121). 493–506.Google Scholar
Galton, Herbert
1976The main functions of the Slavic verbal aspect. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Grønn, Atle
2003The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian factual imperfective. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew & Marius Jøhndal
2008Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations. In Caroline Sporleder & Kiril Ribarov (eds.), Proceedings of the LaTeCH Workshop – LREC, 27–34. Marrakech: www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2008​/index​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal, Hanne Martine Eckhoff, Eirik Welo, Mari Johanne Bordal Hertzenberg & Angelika Müth
2009Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of Indo-European languages. Traitement Automatique des Langues 50. 17–45.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik
1997Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages: Theory, typology and diachrony (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr
1965Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Beck. Crossref
Jagić, Vatroslav
1883Quattuor evangeliorum versionis palaeoslovenicae Codex Marianus glagoliticus. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
1954Quattuor Evangeliorum Codes Glagoliticus olim Zographensis nunc Petropolitanus: characteribus cyrillicis transcriptum notis criticis prolegomenis appendicibus auctum. Editiones monumentorum Slavicorum veteris dialecti. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1932Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario: a discipulis et Circuli linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblate, 74–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71. 669–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kukuškina, Ol’ga Vladimirovna & Marija Naumovna Ševeleva
1991O formirovanii sovremennoj kategorii glagol’nogo vida. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija 9, filologija 6. 38–49.Google Scholar
Łazorczyk, Agnieszka Agata
2010Decomposing Slavic aspect: The role of aspectual morphology in Polish and other Slavic languages. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G.
2001Old Church Slavonic grammar, 7th edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslov, Jurij Sergeevič
2004Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. In Jurij Sergeevič Maslov, Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologija, obščee jazykoznanie, 165–195. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1902Des aspects perfectif et imperfectif dans la traduction de l’évangile en vieux slave. In Antoine Meillet, Études sur l’étymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave, 2–104. Paris: Émile Bouillon.Google Scholar
1934Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Menge, Hermann, Thorsten Burkard & Markus Schauer
2000Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Molnár, Nándor
1985The calques of Greek origin in the most ancient Old Slavic gospel texts (Slavistische Forschungen 47). Cologne/Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore
2012One or several categories? The Old Church Slavonic nǫ-verbs and linguistic profiling. Russian Linguistics 36.285–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V.
1996Semantičeskie issledovanija. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Růžička, Rudolf
1957Der Verbalaspekt in der altrussischen Nestorchronik (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik 14). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A.
1993Bulgarian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 188–248. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M.
1995The dawn of Slavic: An introduction to Slavic philology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schooneveld, Cornelis H. van
1951The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word 7. 96–103.Google Scholar
Schuyt, Roel
1990The morphology of Slavic verbal aspect: A descriptive and historical study (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 14). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine
2005Beginning and end in the acquisition of the perfective aspect in Russian. Journal of Child Language Research 32. 805–825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von
1869–1872Novum Testamentum Graece, 8th edn. Leipzig: Hinrichs. Crossref
Traugott, Elizabeth
1988Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Zaimov, Jordan & Mario Capaldo
(eds.) 1982Suprasŭlski ili Retkov sbornik: v dva to ma. Sofia: Izdatel’stvo na Bŭlgarskata Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar