Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp. 186–230

Aspect and prefixation in Old Church Slavonic

| UiT The Arctic University of Norway
| University of Oslo
In this article we focus on one grammaticalization path to perfective markers, that of the so-called ‘bounder perfectives’ (Bybee & Dahl 1989). Systems with these kinds of perfective markers – often called ‘Slavic-style aspect’ – are particularly elaborated in the Slavic languages. To examine why this is the case, we study the long-disputed question of the semantic relationship between the inflectional aspectual system inherited from PIE and the emerging affixation-based verb pair system in expressing aspect in Old Church Slavonic (OCS), using parallel Greek and OCS data from the PROIEL corpus. Previous researchers have made extremely conflicting claims about this relationship, some seeing the inflectional system as the main exponent of aspect, others seeing the affixation system as the main exponent of aspect. Our statistical study of the data shows rather that the OCS system attests an interesting language stage where there are two partially overlapping exponents of aspect. By firmly establishing the facts of the synchronic OCS system, we can look both backwards and forwards. We argue that Slavic ‘bounder perfectives’ owe their advanced development to their coexistence with the old inflectional aspect system. We also argue that the well-known interactions between the two aspectual systems in Bulgarian, which still retains both, are probably a later development.
Keywords: grammaticalization, Aktionsart, corpus linguistics, aspect, Old Church Slavonic
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.2.02eck
References
Amse-De Jong, Tine H
1974 The meaning of the finite verb forms in the Old Church Slavonic Codex Suprasliensis: A synchronic study. The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Henning
2006 Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica 23(2). 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bary, Corien & Dag Trygve Truslew Haug
2011 Temporal anaphora across and inside sentences: The function of participles. Semantics and Pragmatics 4(8). 1–56. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermel, Neil
1997 Context and the lexicon in the development of Russian aspect (University of California Publications in Linguistics 129). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Mary Swift
2004 Event realization and default aspect. Linguistics and Philosophy 271. 263–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring sense, volume II: The normal course of events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borodič, Vera Vladimirovna
1953 K voprosu o formirovanii soveršennogo i nesoveršennogo vida v slavjanskix jazykax. Voprosy jazykoznanija 61. 68–86.Google Scholar
Bronckart, Jean-Paul & Hermina Sinclair
1973 Time, tense and aspect. Cognition 21. 107–130. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Östen Dahl
1989 The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13(1).51–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Capaldo, Mario
1985 O nedostatkax i novšestvax novogo izdanija Suprasl’skogo sbornika. Polata Knigopisnaia: An Information Bulletin Devoted to the Study of Early Slavic Books, Texts and Literatures 131. 29–43.Google Scholar
Cejtlin, Ralja Michajlovna, Radoslav Večerka & Emilija Blagova
1994 Staroslavjanskij slovar’ (po rukopisjam X–XI vekov). Moscow: Russkij jazyk.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1976 Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2010 Time, tense and aspect in Early Vedic grammar: Exploring inflectional semantics in the Rigveda (Studies in Indo-European Languages and Linguistics 5). Leiden: Brill. Crossref
Dahl, Östen
. Tense and aspect systems 1985 Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Darden, Bill
2004 A history of the East Slavic imperfect. Paper presented at the Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies. http://​www​.billdarden​.com​/papers​/darden​_2004​_eslav​_imperf​.pdf
Dostál, Antonin
1954 Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Prague: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Eckardt, Regine
2006 Meaning change in grammaticalization: An enquiry into semantic reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckhoff, Hanne & Laura Janda
2014 Grammatical profiles and aspect in Old Church Slavonic. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(2). 231–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ernout, Alfred & François Thomas
1959 Syntaxe latine, 2nd edn. Paris: Klincksieck.
Forsyth, James
1972 The nature and development of the aspectual opposition in the Russian verb. The Slavonic and East European Review 50(121). 493–506.Google Scholar
Galton, Herbert
1976 The main functions of the Slavic verbal aspect. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Grønn, Atle
2003 The semantics and pragmatics of the Russian factual imperfective. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Google Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew & Marius Jøhndal
2008 Creating a parallel treebank of the old Indo-European Bible translations. In Caroline Sporleder & Kiril Ribarov (eds.), Proceedings of the LaTeCH Workshop – LREC, 27–34. Marrakech: www​.lrec​-conf​.org​/proceedings​/lrec2008​/index​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Haug, Dag Trygve Truslew, Marius Jøhndal, Hanne Martine Eckhoff, Eirik Welo, Mari Johanne Bordal Hertzenberg & Angelika Müth
2009 Computational and linguistic issues in designing a syntactically annotated parallel corpus of Indo-European languages. Traitement Automatique des Langues 501. 17–45.Google Scholar
Hewson, John & Vit Bubenik
1997 Tense and aspect in Indo-European languages: Theory, typology and diachrony (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 145). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref
Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr
1965 Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Beck. Crossref
Jagić, Vatroslav
1883 Quattuor evangeliorum versionis palaeoslovenicae Codex Marianus glagoliticus. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
1954 Quattuor Evangeliorum Codes Glagoliticus olim Zographensis nunc Petropolitanus: characteribus cyrillicis transcriptum notis criticis prolegomenis appendicibus auctum. Editiones monumentorum Slavicorum veteris dialecti. Graz: Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1932 Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. In Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio quinquagenario: a discipulis et Circuli linguistici Pragensis sodalibus oblate, 74–84. Prague: Cercle Linguistique de Prague.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1994 Time in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995 A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 711. 669–695. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kukuškina, Ol’ga Vladimirovna & Marija Naumovna Ševeleva
1991 O formirovanii sovremennoj kategorii glagol’nogo vida. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta, serija 9, filologija 61. 38–49.Google Scholar
Łazorczyk, Agnieszka Agata
2010 Decomposing Slavic aspect: The role of aspectual morphology in Polish and other Slavic languages. Los Angeles: University of Southern California dissertation.Google Scholar
Lunt, Horace G
2001 Old Church Slavonic grammar, 7th edn. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maslov, Jurij Sergeevič
2004 Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. In Jurij Sergeevič Maslov, Izbrannye trudy: Aspektologija, obščee jazykoznanie, 165–195. Moscow: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1902 Des aspects perfectif et imperfectif dans la traduction de l’évangile en vieux slave. In Antoine Meillet, Études sur l’étymologie et le vocabulaire du vieux slave, 2–104. Paris: Émile Bouillon.Google Scholar
1934 Le slave commun. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Menge, Hermann, Thorsten Burkard & Markus Schauer
2000 Lehrbuch der lateinischen Syntax und Semantik. Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Molnár, Nándor
1985 The calques of Greek origin in the most ancient Old Slavic gospel texts (Slavistische Forschungen 47). Cologne/Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Nesset, Tore
2012 One or several categories? The Old Church Slavonic nǫ-verbs and linguistic profiling. Russian Linguistics 361.285–303. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Padučeva, Elena V
1996 Semantičeskie issledovanija. Moscow: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Růžička, Rudolf
1957 Der Verbalaspekt in der altrussischen Nestorchronik (Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Slawistik 14). Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A
1993 Bulgarian. In Bernard Comrie & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), The Slavonic languages, 188–248. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schenker, Alexander M
1995 The dawn of Slavic: An introduction to Slavic philology. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schooneveld, Cornelis H. van
1951 The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti. Word 71. 96–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schuyt, Roel
1990 The morphology of Slavic verbal aspect: A descriptive and historical study (Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 14). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stoll, Sabine
2005 Beginning and end in the acquisition of the perfective aspect in Russian. Journal of Child Language Research 321. 805–825. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tischendorf, Constantin von
1869–1872 Novum Testamentum Graece, 8th edn. Leipzig: Hinrichs. Crossref
Traugott, Elizabeth
1988 Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser & Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Zaimov, Jordan & Mario Capaldo
(eds.) 1982 Suprasŭlski ili Retkov sbornik: v dva to ma. Sofia: Izdatel’stvo na Bŭlgarskata Akademija na Naukite.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 10 other publications

No author info given
2020.  In The NP-strategy for Expressing Reciprocity [Typological Studies in Language, 127], Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne, Kristin Bech, Gerlof Bouma, Kristine Eide, Dag Haug, Odd Einar Haugen & Marius Jøhndal
2018. The PROIEL treebank family: a standard for early attestations of Indo-European languages. Language Resources and Evaluation 52:1 ► pp. 29 ff. Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2018. A corpus approach to the history of Russian po delimitatives. Diachronica 35:3 ► pp. 338 ff. Crossref logo
Eckhoff, Hanne Martine
2020.  In Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics [Benjamins Current Topics, 113], ► pp. 42 ff. Crossref logo
Gvozdanovic, Jadranka
2019.  In Historical Linguistics 2015 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 348], ► pp. 302 ff. Crossref logo
Kotin, Michail L.
2020.  In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 352], ► pp. 412 ff. Crossref logo
Olsson, Gustaf
2018. The Formation of Aspectual Pairs of Borrowed ova-verbs in Russian. Scando-Slavica 64:2 ► pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo
Plungjan, Vladimir A.
2017.  In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39], ► pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Szymański, Leszek
2019. The semantic field of the English modal auxiliary can interacting with the grammatical aspect of the main verb in Contemporary American English. Brno studies in English :1 ► pp. [75] ff. Crossref logo
Wiemer, Björn
2017.  In The role of prefixes in the formation of aspectuality [Biblioteca di Studi Slavistici, 39], ► pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.