Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:2 (2015) ► pp. 268276
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Sampson, Geoffrey
2019. An unaddressed phonological contradiction. International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 6:2  pp. 221 ff. Crossref logo
Sims-Williams, Helen & Hans-Olav Enger
2021. The loss of inflection as grammar complication. Diachronica 38:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Yin, Sora Heng & James White
2018. Neutralization and homophony avoidance in phonological learning. Cognition 179  pp. 89 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 december 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Baerman, Matthew
2011Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics 47(1). 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Michael, Nihan Ketrez & Andrew Nevins
2011The surfeit of the stimulus: Analytic biases filter lexical statistics in Turkish laryngeal alternations. Language 87(1). 84–125. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, Juliette & Andrew Wedel
2009Inhibited sound change: An evolutionary approach to lexical competition. Diachronica 26(2). 143–183. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bouchard-Cotê, Alexandre, David Hall, Thomas L. Griffiths & Dan Klein
2013Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(11). 4224–4229. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crosswhite, Katherine
1999Intra-paradigmatic homophony avoidance in two dialects of Slavic. In Matthew K. Gordon (ed.), Papers in phonology 2 (UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 1), 48–67. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Gessner, Suzanne & Gunnar Ólafur Hansson
2004Anti-homophony effects in Dakelh (Carrier) valence morphology. In Marc Ettlinger, Nicholas Fleischer & Mischa Park-Doob (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 93–104. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Gilliéron, Jules
1918Généalogie des mots qui désignent l’abeille d’apres l’atlas linguistique de la France. Paris: É. Champion.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce & James White
2013Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning. Linguistic Inquiry 44(1). 45–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hockett, Charles F.
1967The quantification of functional load. Word 23. 320–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ichimura, Larry K.
2006Anti-homophony blocking and its productivity in transparadigmatic relations. Boston, MA: Boston University dissertation.Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abby
2011How much homophony is normal? Journal of Linguistics 47(3). 631–671. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abby & Yuka Muratani
Forthcoming. Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Laboratory Phonology 6(2).
Kenstowicz, Michael
2002Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Aniko Csirmaz, Zhiqiang Li, Andrew Nevins, Olga Vaysman & Michael Wagner (eds.), Phonological answers (and their corresponding questions) (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42), 141–163. Cambridge, MA: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
King, Robert D.
1967Functional load and sound change. Language 43(4). 831–852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles W. & Mohammad Imam Abasheikh
1974A case of systematic avoidance of homonyms. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 4(1). 107–124.Google Scholar
Martinet, André
1952Function, structure, and sound change. Word 8(1). 1–32.Google Scholar
Mondon, Jean-François
2009The nature of homophony and its effects on diachrony and synchrony. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania dissertation.Google Scholar
Moreton, Elliott
1997Phonotactic rules in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102(5). 3091. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muratani, Yuka
2014Categorical and gradient homophony avoidance: Evidence from Japanese. Paper presented at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Linguistics Colloquium, March 22.
Paster, Mary
2010The role of homophony avoidance in morphology: A case study from Mixtec. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 21. 29–39.Google Scholar
Sampson, Geoffrey
2013A counterexample to homophony avoidance. Diachronica 30(4). 579–591. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, Daniel
2010Neutralization and anti-homophony in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 46(2). 453–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Neutralization (Key Topics in Phonology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Scott Jackson & Abby Kaplan
2013aFunctional load and the lexicon: Evidence that syntactic category and frequency relationships in minimal lemma pairs predict the loss of phoneme contrasts. Language and Speech 56(3). 395–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wedel, Andrew, Abby Kaplan & Scott Jackson
2013bHigh functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition 128(2). 179–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar