Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:4 (2015) ► pp.449–493

Stability, stasis and change

The longue durée of intensification

Intensification is prone to invention and renewal, rendering it ideal for delving into mechanisms of variation and change. Recycling (via lexical replacement) is a putative longitudinal constant, yet grammatical change (via grammaticalization) is regularly invoked in the literature. It is not clear how these complement each other. To probe this issue, this paper operationalizes variationist methods to examine intensification in the Origins of New Zealand English Corpus (ONZE; Gordon et al. 2007). The analysis draws on nearly 13,000 tokens across the longue durée (Braudel 1958, 1980), tracing intensification over 130 years of vernacular speech. The picture that emerges extends beyond the distributional waxing and waning of forms. There is evidence for lexical change, but the longitudinal trajectory is not always continuous. Replacement entails reorganization followed by leveling, and grammatical correlates shift across time. Nonetheless, the inherent form/function asymmetry that characterizes the sector also supports periods of ‘fevered’ change.

Keywords: lexical replacement, longitudinal change, New Zealand English, grammaticalization, intensification, moderators, amplifiers
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.01dar
References
Adamson, Sylvia
2000 A lovely little example: Word order options and category shift in the premodifying string. In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 39–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allerton, David J
1987 English intensifiers and their idiosyncrasies. In Ross Steele & Terry Threadgold (eds.), Language topics: Essays in honour of Michael Halliday, vol. 21, 15–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis & Alexandra Georgakopoulos
2003 Discourse constructions of youth identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bäcklund, Ulf
1973 The collocation of adverbs of degree in English. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Barnfield, Kate & Isabelle Buchstaller
2010 Intensifiers on Tyneside: Longitudinal developments and new trends. English World-Wide 31(3). 252–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bauer, Laurie & Winifred Bauer
2002 Adjective boosters in the English of Young New Zealanders. Journal of English Linguistics 30(3). 244–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Besnier, Niko
1990 Language and affect. Annual Review of Anthropology 191. 419–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Edward Finegan
1988 Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes 11(1). 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999 Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 Degree words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borst, Eugene
1902 Die Gradadverbien im Englischen (Anglistische Forschungen 10). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Braudel, Fernand
1958 Histoire et science sociale: La longue durée. Annales E.S.C. 131. 725–753. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1980. [1969] Ecrits sur l’histoire. Reprinted essays; translated as On history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
Forthcoming. The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectificatio. English Language and Linguistics.
Brems, Lieselotte
2007 The grammaticalization of small size nouns: Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 35(4). 293–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Leslie K. Arnovik
2006 The English language: A linguistic history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, LeAnn & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2012 A really interesting story: The influence of narrative in linguistic change. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 181. Article 2. [URL]Google Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2006 Diagnostics of age-graded linguistic behaviour: The case of the quotative system. Journal of Sociolinguistics 10(1). 3–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Quotations across the generations: A multivariate analysis of speech and thought introducers across 5 decades of Tyneside speech. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1). 59–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Buchstaller, Isabelle & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2006 The Lady was al Demonyak: Historical aspects of adverb all. English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 345–370. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2003a Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language, 145–167. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2003b Mechanisms of change in grammaticalization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–623. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Alistair
1959 Old English grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K
2001 Region and language variation. English World-Wide 21(2). 169–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003 Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Merja Kytö
2014a ‘I had lost sight of them for a bit, but I went on pretty fast’: Two degree modifiers in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds.), Diachronic corpus pragmatics, 29–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014b ‘You are a bit of a sneak’: Exploring a degree modifier in the Old Bailey Corpus. In Marianne Hundt (ed.), Late Modern English syntax, 239–268. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra
2012 The diachrony of quotation: Evidence from New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 24(3). 343–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diehl, Hannelle
2005 Quite as a degree modifier of verbs. Nordic Journal of English Studies 4(1). 11–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W
1977 Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language 11. 19–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Adjective classes in typological perspective. In Robert M.W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), Adjective classes. A cross-linguistic typology, 1–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie & Barbara Horvath
1999 When the music changes, you change too: Gender and language change in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 11(3). 287–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fettig, Adolf
1934 Die Gradadverbien im Mittelenglischen (Anglistische Forschungen 79). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
González-Díaz, Victorina
2008 Recent developments in English intensifiers: The case of very much. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 221–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Lyle Campbell, Jennifer Hay, Margaret Maclagan, Andrea Sudbury & Peter Trudgill
2004 New Zealand English: Its origins and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Elizabeth, Jennifer Hay & Margaret Maclagan
2007 The ONZE Corpus. In Joan C. Beal, Karen P. Corrigan & Hermann L. Moisl (eds.), Creating and digitizing language corpora, vol. 2, Diachronic databases, 82–104. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregersen, Frans & Michael Barner-Rasmussen
2011 The logic of comparability: On genres and phonetic variation in a project on language change in real time. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 7(1). 7–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guy, Greg
1988 Advanced Varbrul analysis. In Kathleen Ferrara, Becky Brown, Keith Walters & John Baugh (eds.), Linguistic change and contact. Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation , 124–136. Austin: University of Texas at Austin.
Hay, Jennifer & Daniel Schreier
2004 Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject Verb Agreement with BE in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 16(3). 209–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hay, Jennifer & Andrea Sudbury
2005 How rhoticity became /r/-sandhi. Language 81(4). 799–823. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Sebastian
2004 Are low-frequency complex prepositions grammaticalized? On the limits of corpus data — and the importance of intuition. In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 171–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J
1991 On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, vol. I1, 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 Grammaticalization. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingersoll, Sheila M
1978 Intensive and restrictive modification in Old English (Anglistische Forschungen 124). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Ito, Rika & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2003 Well weird, right dodgy, very strange, really cool. Language in Society 32(3). 257–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1922 Language: Its nature, development, and origin. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009 Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klerk, Vivian de
2005 Expressing levels of intensity in Xhosa English. English World-Wide 26(1). 77–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Edgar Schneider
2006 Varieties of English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989 Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1(3). 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1970 The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale 231. 30–87.Google Scholar
1971 Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1). 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972 Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
1981 Speech actions and reactions in personal narrative. In Deborah Tannen (ed.), Analyzing discourse: Text and talk. Georgetown University Round Table, 217–247. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1985 Intensity. In Deborah Schiffrin (ed.), Meaning, form and use in context: Linguistic applications, 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
1990 The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change 2(2). 205–254. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1, Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
1997 Some further steps in narrative analysis. Journal of Narrative and Life History 71. 395–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2, Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William & David Fanshel
1977 Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Joshua Waletzky
1967 Narrative analysis. In June Helm (ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts, 12–44. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Laks, Bernard
1992 La linguistique variationniste comme méthode. Langages 108(1). 34–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langstrof, Christian
2006 Acoustic evidence for a push-chain shift in the Intermediate Period of New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 18(2). 141–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, Gunter
2002 Really worthwhile or not really significant? A corpus-based approach to the delexicalization and grammaticalization of intensifiers in Modern English. In Ilse Wischer & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New reflections on grammaticalization, 143–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Macaulay, Ronald
1995 The adverbs of authority. English World-Wide 16(1). 37–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Extremely interesting, very interesting, or only quite interesting: Adverbs and social class. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(3). 398–417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Pure grammaticalization: The development of a teenage intensifier. Language Variation and Change 18(3). 267–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meillet, Antoine
1912 Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2003 On intensifiers and grammaticalization: The case of swiþe. English Studies 84(4). 372–391. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27(1). 141–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008a On the history of downright. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 267–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Special issue on English intensifiers. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 213–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008c The which is most and right harde to answere: Intensifying right and most in earlier English. In Richard Dury, Maurizio Gotti & Marina Dossena (eds.), Historical English linguistics 2006, vol. II, Lexical and semantic change, 31–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Méndez-Naya, Belén & Päivi Pahta
2010 Intensifiers in competition: The picture from early English medical writing. In Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds.), Early Modern English medical texts: Corpus description and studies, 191–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985 Old English syntax, vol. 1, Concord, the parts of speech, and the sentence. Oxford: Clarendon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F
1960 A Middle English syntax, part 1, Parts of speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1994 Aspects of adverbial change in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 243–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1997 The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds.), Grammaticalization at work: Studies of long-term developments in English, 145–190. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Three perspectives on grammaticalization: Lexico-grammar, corpora and historical sociolinguistics. In Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Social variation in intensifier use: Constraint on -ly adverbialization in the past? English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 289–315. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Helena Raumolin-Brunberg
2003 Historical sociolinguistics: Language change in Tudor and Stewart England. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen
2002 Fairly pretty or pretty fair? On the development and grammaticalization of English downtoners. Language Sciences 241. 359–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor & Bambi Schieffelin
1989 Language has a heart. Text 9(11). 7–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palacios Martínez, Ignacio M. & Paloma Núñez Pertejo
2012 He’s absolutely massive. It’s a super day. Madonna, she is a wicked singer. Youth language and intensification: A corpus-based study. Text & Talk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 32(6). 773–796.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carita
1997 Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2000 It’s well weird. Degree modifiers of adjectives revisited: The nineties. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 147–160. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2008 Configurations, construals and change: Expressions of DEGREE. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 317–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partington, Alan
1993 Corpus evidence of language change: The case of intensifiers. In Mona Baker, Gill Francis & Elena Tognini-Bonelli (eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair, 177–192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peltola, Niilo
1971 Observations on intensification in Old English poetry. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 821. 649–690.Google Scholar
Peters, Hans
1992 English boosters: Some synchronic and diachronic aspects. In Günter Kellermann & Michael D. Morrissey (eds.), Diachrony within synchrony: Language history and cognition, 529–545. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
1993 Die englischen Gradadverbien der Kategorie booster. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
1994 Degree adverbs in early modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Early Modern English, 269–288. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana
2011 A variationist perspective on grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 209–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Elisabete Malvar
2007 Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change: The expression of the future in Brazillian Portuguese. Probus 19(1). 121–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Sali A. Tagliamonte
1996 Nothing in context: Variation, grammaticisation and past time marking in Nigerian Pidgin English. In Philip Baker & Anand Syea (eds.), Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalisation in creole languages, 71–94. Westminster: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
2001 African American English in the diaspora. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Pyles, Thomas & John Algeo
1993 The origins and development of the English language. 4th edn. Boston: Heinle.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2008 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Online: [URL].Google Scholar
Rickford, John, Thomas Wasow, Arnold Zwicky & Isabelle Buchstaller
2007 Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new. American Speech 82(1). 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rissanen, Matti
2008 From ‘quickly’ to ‘fairly’: On the history of rather. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 345–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robertson, Stuart
1954 The development of Modern English. Rev. by Frederic G. Cassidy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah
1981 Tense variation in narrative. Language 57(1). 45–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1992 Trust the text: The implications are daunting. In Martin Davies & Louise Ravelli (eds.), Advances in systemic linguistics, 5–19. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita
1987 What does really really do? In James Monaghan (ed.), Grammar in the construction of texts, 65–79. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
1999 He was really gormless — she’s bloody crap: Girls, boys and intensifiers. In Hilde Hasselgård & Signe Oksefjell (eds.), Out of corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson, 69–78. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2000 It’s enough funny, man: Intensifiers in teenage talk. In John M. Kirk (ed.), Corpora galore: Analyses and techniques in describing English, 177–190. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita, Gisle Andersen & Ingrid Kristine Hasund
2002 Trends in teenage talk: Corpus compilation, analysis and findings. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stoffel, Cornelis
1901 Intensives and downtoners (Anglistische Forchungen 1). Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A
2006 Analysing sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada. English Language and Linguistics 12(2). 361–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Julian Brooke
2014 A weird (language) tale: Variation and change in the adjectives of strangeness. American Speech 89(1). 4–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Derek Denis
2014 Expanding the transmission/diffusion dichotomy. Language 90(1). 90–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Alexandra D’Arcy
2009 Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation and language change. Language 85(1). 58–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Rika Ito
2002 Think really different: Continuity and specialization in the English adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2). 236–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Chris Roberts
2005 So weird; so cool; so innovative: The use of intensifiers in the television series Friends. American Speech 80(3). 280–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
2007 A corpus-based investigation of absolutely and related phenomena in spoken American English. Journal of English Linguistics 35(1). 5–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2009 Variation and grammaticisation: The emergence of an aspectual opposition. In Stavroula Tsiplakou, Marilena Karyolemou & Pavlos Pavlou (eds.), Studies in language variation: European perspectives II, 215–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 Variation and grammaticalization. In Manuel Diaz-Campos (ed.), The handbook of Hispanic sociolinguistics, 148–167. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1988 Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaiser & Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2005 Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18(4). 523–557. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Grammaticalization. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 269–283. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2004 New dialect formation: The inevitability of colonial Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich
1988 Syntax der Englischen Adverbialen (Linguistische Arbeiten 215). Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Schneidemesser, Luanne
2000 Lexical change, language change. American Speech 75(4). 420–422. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Suzanne Evans & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2014 Incrementation in adolescence: Tapping the force that drives linguistic change. Paper presented at the 3rd International Society for the Linguistics of English Conference . Zurich, Switzerland.
Walker, James A
2010 Variation in linguistic systems. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, William Labov & Marvin I. Herzog
1968 Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 23 other publications

Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Two sides of the same coin?. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Blanco-Suárez, Zeltia
2020. Mortal hurryandmortal fine: on the rise of intensifyingmortal. Studia Neophilologica 92:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Claridge, Claudia, Ewa Jonsson & Merja Kytö
2021. A Little Something Goes a Long Way: Little in the Old Bailey Corpus. Journal of English Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Denis, Derek
2017. The Development ofAnd Stuffin Canadian English: A Longitudinal Study of Apparent Grammaticalization. Journal of English Linguistics 45:2 ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Franco, Karlien & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2021. InterestingFellowor Tough OldBird?. American Speech 96:2 ► pp. 192 ff. DOI logo
GARDNER, MATT HUNT, DEREK DENIS, MARISA BROOK & SALI A. TAGLIAMONTE
2021. Be like and the Constant Rate Effect: from the bottom to the top of the S-curve. English Language and Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 281 ff. DOI logo
Litty, Samantha, David Natvig, Jessica Funtanilla, Hunter Lockwood, James Maedke, Christopher Tabisz & Joseph Salmons
2016. Anything Goes: Extreme Polysemy in Lexical-Semantic Change. American Speech 91:2 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
Méndez-Naya, Belén
2017. Co-occurrence and iteration of intensifiers in Early English. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
2022. Paula Rautionaho, Arja Nurmi and Juhani Klemola (eds.). Corpora and the changing society. Studies in the evolution of English (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 96). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2020. 305 pp. ISBN 9789027205438 (HB). ICAME Journal 46:1 ► pp. 43 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. How Learner Corpus Research can inform language learning and teaching. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 43:2 ► pp. 196 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. Analyzing change in the American English amplifier system in the fiction genre. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 223 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2020. A corpus-based analysis of differences in the use of very for adjective amplification among native speakers and learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6:2 ► pp. 163 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2021. Ongoing change in the Australian English amplifier system. Australian Journal of Linguistics 41:2 ► pp. 166 ff. DOI logo
Schweinberger, Martin
2021. On the waning of forms – A corpus-based analysis of decline and loss in adjective amplification. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Stratton, James M.
2020. A diachronic analysis of the adjective intensifierwellfrom Early Modern English to Present Day English. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 65:2 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Stratton, James M.
2020. Adjective Intensifiers in German. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Stratton, James M.
2021. ‘That's proper cool’. English Today 37:4 ► pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
Stratton, James M.
2022. Old English intensifiers. Journal of Historical Linguistics 12:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Vaughn, Charlotte, Tyler Kendall & Kaylynn Gunter
2018. Probing the Social Meaning of English Adjective Intensifiers as a Class Lab Project. American Speech 93:2 ► pp. 298 ff. DOI logo
Wagner, Susanne
2017. Totally new and pretty awesome : Amplifier–adjective bigrams in GloWbE. Lingua 200 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Wagner, Susanne
2019. Whyvery goodin India might bepretty goodin North America. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 24:4 ► pp. 445 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2017. Discourse-Pragmatic Variation in Context [Studies in Language Companion Series, 187], DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. On the waning of forms - A corpus-based analysis of decline and loss in adjective amplification. In Lost in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 218], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.