Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 32:4 (2015) ► pp.494–529

Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects

In mediaeval Gallo-Romance, due to regular sound change, the reflexes of Latin perfectum forms develop stem allomorphy linked to alternation between rhizotonic and arrhizotonic stress. Both the allomorphy and the stress alternation are subsequently eradicated. By contrast, in early Italo-Romance, existing stem allomorphy is redistributed by analogy so that, in the reflexes of Latin perfectum forms, stem alternation and stress alternation have the same distribution, a situation which persists into modern Italo-Romance. These developments illustrate a tendency for the exponents of morphomic distributions to be aligned with one another, facilitating reliable inferences about the forms realising different paradigm cells.
Keywords: Romance, French, Italian, morphological complexity, Occitan, inflectional morphology, autonomous morphology
Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.32.4.02esh
References (74)
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.) Analogy in grammar, 54–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf. 2013. Morphological organization: The low conditional entropy conjecture. Language 89(3). 429–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Albright, Adam. 2009. Modeling analogy as probabilistic grammar. In James P. Blevins & Juliette Blevins (eds.) Analogy in grammar, 185–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alibèrt, Loís. 1976. Gramatica occitana segon los parlars lengadocians. Montpellier: Centre d’Etudes Occitanes.Google Scholar
Allières, Jacques. 2005. Formation et structure de l’occitan ancien. Villeneuve-sur-Lot: Le Luy de France.Google Scholar
Anglade, Joseph. 1921. Grammaire de l’ancien provençal. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself: Stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Audring, Jenny. 2014. Gender as a complex feature. Language Sciences 431. 5–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bach, Xavier & Louise Esher. 2015. Morphological evidence for the paradigmatic status of infinitives in French and Occitan. In Dag Haug (ed.), Historical linguistics 2013, 135–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badía Margarit, Antoni M. 1951. Gramática histórica catalana. Barcelona: Noguer.Google Scholar
. 1962. Gramática catalana. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Barral, Marcel. 1980. L’imparfait du subjonctif. Paris: Picard.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Natural and unnatural sound patterns: A pocket field guide. In Klaas Willems & Ludovic De Cuypere (eds.), Naturalness and iconicity in language, 121–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bourciez, Jean. 1927. Recherches historiques et géographiques sur le parfait en Gascogne. Bordeaux: Feret.Google Scholar
Broussard, James F. 1922. Relative value of French verb tenses. The Modern Language Journal 7(1). 37–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5). 425–455. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Mary Brewer. 1980. Explanation in morphophonemics: Changes in Provençal and Spanish preterite forms. Lingua 52(3). 201–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Jean E. Newman. 1995. Are stem changes as natural as affixes? Linguistics 33(4). 633–654. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea & Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy. 2000. Stem alternations as morphological signifiés: Evidence from blur avoidance in Polish nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(4). 813–835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70(4). 737–788. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The evolution of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chambon, Jean-Pierre. 2003. Morphologie des parfaits en ancien occitan: à la recherche de la marque et des types. Revue des langues romanes 107(2). 429–497.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. & Matthew Baerman. 2006. Prolegomena to a typology of morphological features. Morphology 16(2). 231–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durand, Jacques. 2009. Essai de panorama phonologique: les accents du Midi. In Luc Baronian & France Martineau (eds.), Le français, d’un continent à l’autre: Mélanges offerts à Yves Charles Morin, 123–170. Quebec: Presses de l’Université Laval.Google Scholar
Enger, Hans-Olav. 2014. Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure 7(2). 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Esher, Louise. 2014. Autonomous morphology and extramorphological coherence. Morphology 24(4). 325–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fabra, Pompeu. 1956. Gramàtica catalana. Barcelona: Teide.Google Scholar
Fouché, Pierre. 1967. Le verbe français, étude morphologique. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Foulet, Lucien. 1920. La disparition du prétérit. Romania 46(2–3). 271–313.Google Scholar
Gerken, Louann, Rachel Wilson & William Lewis. 2005. Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language 32(2). 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grandgent, Charles Hall. 1909. An outline of the phonology and morphology of old Provençal. Boston: Heath.Google Scholar
Hall, Nancy. 2011. Epenthetic vowels. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 1576–1596. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2002. Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus 14(1). 147–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klausenburger, Jurgen. 1970. French prosodics and phonotactics. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanly, André. 1977. Morphologie historique des verbes français. Paris: Bordas.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2011. Syllable, segment and prosody. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 50–108. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 2000. Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano 85(2). 137–171.Google Scholar
. 2001. A strange affinity: Perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 78(4). 441–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di Grammatica Italiana 221. 1–61.Google Scholar
. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004, 137–175. Amsterdam: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009a. Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: Preterito e tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 125(2). 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009b. From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 381. 45–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011a. Morphological persistence. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 155–215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011b. Morphophonological innovation. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith & Adam Ledgeway (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. I: Structures, 216–267. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 2011c. Allomorphy, autonomous morphology and phonological conditioning in the history of the Daco-Romance present and subjunctive. Transactions of the Philological Society 109(1). 59–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. ‘Semi-autonomous’ morphology? A problem in the history of the Italian (and Romanian) verb. In Silvio Cruschina, Martin Maiden & John Charles Smith (eds.), The boundaries of pure morphology, 24–44. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica 30(4). 492–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christine. 1995. L’évolution du français. Ordre des mots, démonstratifs, accent tonique. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Martin, Guy & Bernard Moulin. 1998. Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques. Aix-en-Provence: Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans.Google Scholar
Maschi, Roberta & Laura Vanelli. 2010. Morfologia verbale. In Giampaolo Salvi & Lorenzo Renzi (eds.), Grammatica dell’italiano antico, vol. II1, 1431–1491. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Massourre, Jean-Louis. 2006. Le Gascon haut-pyrénéen. Vallées de Luz, de Barèges et de Gavarnie. Villeneuve-sur-Lot: Massourre.Google Scholar
Montermini, Fabio & Olivier Bonami. 2013. Stem spaces and predictability in verbal inflection. Lingue e linguaggio 24(2). 171–190.Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew, Cilene Rodrigues & Kevin Tang. 2015. The rise and fall of the L-shaped morphome: diachronic and experimental studies. Probus 27(1). 101–155. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Paul. 2014. The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology 24(1). 25–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 1969. El habla pasiega. London: Thamesis.Google Scholar
. 1978. Estudio estructural del habla de Tudanca. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. A history of the Spanish language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peperkamp, Sharon. 2004. Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language 80(1). 98–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pope, Mildred K. 1934. From Latin to modern French. Manchester: University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst. 1970. Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rainsford, Thomas. 2011. The emergence of group stress in medieval French. Cambridge: Cambridge University Ph.D dissertation.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhardt. 1968a. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 1. Fonetica. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
. 1968b. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, vol. 2. Morfologia. Torino: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Romieu, Maurice & André Bianchi. 2005. Gramatica de l’occitan gascon contemporanèu. Bordeaux: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Ronjat, Jules. 1937. Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III, Morphologie, notes de syntaxe. Montpellier: Société des Langues Romanes.Google Scholar
Round, Erich. 2015. Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes and metamorphomes. In Matthew Baerman, Dunstan Brown & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Understanding and measuring morphological complexity, 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicre, Paul. 1909. Eléments de grammaire du dialecte de Foix. Foix: Société Ariégeoise.Google Scholar
Skårup, Povl. 1997. Morphologie élémentaire de l’ancien occitan. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculaneum Press.Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Östen Dahl (ed.), Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe, 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory & Raphael Finkel. 2013. Morphological typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tekavčić, Pavao. 1980. Grammatica storica dell’italiano. II. Morfosintassi. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 2011. The evolution of a morphome in Catalan verb inflection. In Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds.), Morphological autonomy: Perspectives from Romance inflectional morphology, 183–209. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zink, Gaston. 1986. Phonétique historique du français. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Cited by (14)

Cited by 14 other publications

Herce, Borja & Chundra A. Cathcart
2024. Short vs Long Stem Alternations in Romance Verbal Inflection: The S‐Morphome. Transactions of the Philological Society 122:1 ► pp. 49 ff. DOI logo
Herce, Borja
2022. Quantifying the importance of morphomic structure, semantic values, and frequency of use in Romance stem alternations. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Herce, Borja
2022. Stress and stem allomorphy in the Romance perfectum: emergence, typology, and motivations of a symbiotic relation. Linguistics 60:4 ► pp. 1103 ff. DOI logo
Herce, Borja
2023. Morphological autonomy and the long-term vitality of morphomes: stem-final consonant loss in Romance verbs and paradigmatic analogy. Morphology 33:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Enger, Hans-Olav
2019. Thoughts on morphomes, on a Scandinavian background. In Morphological Variation [Studies in Language Companion Series, 207], ► pp. 159 ff. DOI logo
Enger, Hans-Olav
2019. In defence of morphomic analyses. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 51:1 ► pp. 31 ff. DOI logo
Enger, Hans-Olav
2023. Meta-morphomic patterns in North Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 46:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin
2018. New thoughts on an old puzzle. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 53:2 ► pp. 217 ff. DOI logo
Maiden, Martin
2021. The Morphome. Annual Review of Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
ESHER, LOUISE
2017. Morphome death and transfiguration in the history of French. Journal of Linguistics 53:1 ► pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2021. Les Prétérits nord-occitans à consonne thématique /t/. Revue des langues romanes :Tome CXXV n°1 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2021. Gallo-Romance imperfects betwixt multiple morphomic patterns. Word Structure 14:3 ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Esher, Louise
2022. Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms. Revue Romane. Langue et littérature. International Journal of Romance Languages and Literatures 57:1 ► pp. 86 ff. DOI logo
ESHER, LOUISE
2024. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 285 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.