Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:2 (2016) ► pp.220–254

Tone and registrogenesis in Quiaviní Zapotec

Tone and phonation type are known to show complex interactions. I argue that breathy vowels in one Central Zapotec variety, San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec (Otomanguean, Mexico), has resulted from an original tonal contrast between the low and rising tones (registrogenesis), based both on language-internal and comparative evidence with other closely-related Central Zapotec varieties. The case of Central Zapotec is unusual in that the direction of the sound change is from a tonal contrast to a phonation contrast, while in other known cases the direction is usually the opposite.
Keywords: Zapotec, tone, phonation type, registrogenesis
Published online: 23 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.2.03uch
References (45)
Andruski, Jean & Martha Ratliff. 2000. Phonation types in production of phonological tone: The case of Green Mong. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 301. 37–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arellanes, Francisco. 2009. El sistema fonológico y las propiedades fonéticas del Zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. El Colegio de México dissertation.Google Scholar
Arellanes, Francisco & Sofía Gabriela Morales Camacho. Manuscript. Posesión nominal en el zapoteco de Tierra Blanca.
Avelino, Heriberto. 2004. Topics in Yalálag Zapotec, with particular reference to its phonetic structures. Los Angeles: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar
Benton, Joe. Manuscript. A reconstruction of the tone system of Proto Central Zapotec.
Bickmore, Lee & George A. Broadwell. 1998. High tone docking in Sierra Juarez Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 641. 37–67. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, Barbara. 2002. The timing of nonmodal phonation in vowels. Journal of Phonetics 301. 163–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Elinor. 1961. Mitla Zapotec grammar. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano and Centro de Investigaciones Antropológicas de México.Google Scholar
Broadwell, Aaron. 2015. The historical development of the progressive aspect in Central Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 811. 151–185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brunelle, Marc. 2009. Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics 371. 79–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chávez Peón, Mario E. 2010. The interaction of metrical structure, tone and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec. Vancouver: The University of British Columbia dissertation.Google Scholar
DiCanio, Christian. 2012. Coarticulation between tone and glottal consonants in Itunyoso Trique. Journal of Phonetics 401. 162–176. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, Gérard. 1982. Registres, dévoisement, timbre vocalique: leur histoire en katouique. The Mon-Khmer Studies Journal 111. 47–82.Google Scholar
Esposito, Christina. 2010. Variation in contrastive phonation in Santa Ana del Valle Zapotec. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40(2). 181–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, Marc & Patricia Keating. 2011. The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 411. 185–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garellek, Marc, Patricia Keating, Christina Esposito & Jody Kreiman. 2013. Voice quality and tone identification in White Hmong. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1331. 1078–1089. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1990. Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, André-George. 1954. De l’origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 2421. 69–82.Google Scholar
Hombert, Jean-Marie, John J. Ohala & William G. Ewan. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 551. 37–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry. 1996. Word-prosodic typology. Phonology 231. 225–257. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The representation of tone. In UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report. 108–132.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Jeri. 1983. The Fortis/Lenis question: Evidence from Zapotec and Jawoñ. Journal of Phonetics 111. 177–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John. 2011. Tonogenesis. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), Blackwell companion to phonology, 2304–2334. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Ian Maddieson. 1996. The sounds of the world’s languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
López Cruz, Ausencia. 1997. Morfología verbal del zapoteco de San Pablo Güilá. Bachelor’s thesis, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine & Alexis Michaud. 2008. Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: A case study of Tamang, a “missing link” in tonogenesis. Phonetica 651. 231–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mendoza Bautista, Zeferino C. 2014. Resultados del 3er curso: Taller de tonos sobre lenguas otomangues, teotitlán Del Valle. Paper presented at the 3er Curso-Taller de tonos sobre Lenguas Otomangues .
Munro, Pamela & Felipe H. Lopez, with Olivia V. Méndez [Martínez], Rodrigo Garcia & Michael R. Galant. 1999. Di’csyonaary X:tèe’n Dìi’zh Sah Sann Lu’uc (San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec dictionary/Diccionario Zapoteco de San Lucas Quiaviní). Los Angeles: (UCLA) Chicano Studies Research Center Publications.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela, Brook Danielle Lillehaugen & Felipe H. Lopez. 2007–2008. Cali Chiu? A course in Valley Zapotec. New York: Lulu Press.Google Scholar
Nellis, Donald G. & Barbara E. Hollenbach. 1980. Fortis versus Lenis in Cajonos Zapotec phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics 461. 92–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pham, Andrea Hoa. 2005. Vietnamese tonal system in Nghi Loc: A preliminary report. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 241. 183–201.Google Scholar
Pickett, Velma et al. 2007. Vocabulario zapoteco del Istmo. Español-zapoteco y zapoteco-español, 5th edn. Mexico City: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, A.C.Google Scholar
Pike, Eunice. 1948. Problems in Zapotec tone analysis. International Journal of American Linguistics 141. 161–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pike, Kenneth. 1948. Tone languages: A technique for determining the number and type of pitch contrasts in a langugage, with studies in tonemic substitution and fusion (University of Michigan Publications in Linguistics 4). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Ratliff, Martha. 2015. Tonoexodus, tonogenesis, and tone change. In Patrick Honeybone & Joseph Salmons (eds.), The Oxford handbook of historical phonology, 245–261. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romero-Méndez, Rodrigo. 2008. A reference grammar of Ayutla-Mixe. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo dissertation.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark. 2007. Tono: A linguistics ethnography of tone and voice in a Zapotec region. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan dissertation.Google Scholar
Sicoli, Mark & Terrence Kaufman. 2010. The Zapotec & Chatino Language Archive.Google Scholar
Silverman, Daniel. 1997. Laryngeal complexity in Otomanguean vowels. Phonology 141. 235–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith-Stark, Thomas. 2002. Las clases verbales del zapoteco de Chichicapan. In Las actas del VI Encuentro Internacional de Lingüística en el Noroeste, vol. II1, 165–212. Memorias, Hermosillo: Universidad de Sonora.Google Scholar
. Manuscript. Tipos prosódicos de sílabas en el zapoteco de San Baltasar Chichicapan.
. 2007. Algunas isoglosas zapotecas. In Cristina Buenrostro Herrera Castro & Samuel Lastra (eds.), Clasificación de las lenguas indígenas de México: Memorias del III Coloquio Internacional de Lingüística Mauricio Swadesh, 69–133. Mexico City: UNAM-INALI.Google Scholar
Thurgood, G. 1996. Language contact and the directionality of internal drift: The development of tones and registers in Chamic. Language 721. 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, Ratree & Allard Jongman. 2002. Registrogenesis in Khmer: A phonetic account. Mon-Khmer Studies 321. 101–115.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jie. 2004. The role of contrast-specific and language-specific phonetics in contour tone distribution. In Bruce Hayes, Robert Kirchner & Donca Steriade (eds.), Phonetically based phonology, 157–190. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Bowern, Claire, John Charles Smith, Betsy Sneller, Meredith Tamminga, Jadranka Gvozdanović, John A. Goldsmith, Götz Keydana & Juliette Blevins
2024. Diachrony and Diachronica. Diachronica 41:1 ► pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
2023. The historical dialectology of stative morphology in Zapotecan. Journal of Historical Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Beam de Azcona, Rosemary G.
2024. The tonal morphology of the potential in Coatec Zapotec (Di′zhke′). Journal of Historical Linguistics 14:2 ► pp. 179 ff. DOI logo
Gutiérrez, Ambrocio, Hiroto Uchihara & Ausencia López Cruz
2022. Morphosyntactically Conditioned Tone Change in Central Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 88:3 ► pp. 325 ff. DOI logo
Barzilai, Maya L. & Katherine J. Riestenberg
2021. Context-dependent phonetic enhancement of a phonation contrast in San Pablo Macuiltianguis Zapotec. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1 DOI logo
Esposito, Christina M. & Sameer ud Dowla Khan
2020. The cross‐linguistic patterns of phonation types. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:12 DOI logo
Uchihara, Hiroto & Ambrocio Gutiérrez
2020. Subject and agentivity in Teotitlán Zapotec. Studies in Language 44:3 ► pp. 548 ff. DOI logo
Yang, Meng & Megha Sundara
2019. Cue-shifting between acoustic cues: Evidence for directional asymmetry. Journal of Phonetics 75 ► pp. 27 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.