Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:2 (2016) ► pp.255–281

The wider connections of Austronesian

A response to Blust (2009)

Published online: 23 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.2.04sag
References (75)
Adelaar, Karl Alexander. 2011. Siraya: Retrieving the phonology, grammar and lexicon of a dormant Formosan language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart. 1997. Word formation in Old Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, 35–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2014. Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 1997. Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago (revised edition). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 2005. First farmers: The origin of agricultural societies. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2013. First migrants. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. 1972. Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: University Printing House. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Extra-Austronesian evidence for Formosan etyma. In Paul J.-K. Li, C.H Tsang, Y.-K. Huang, D.-A. Ho & C.Y. Tseng (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan (Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 3), 399–454. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert A. 1980. Austronesian etymologies. Oceanic Linguistics 191. 1–181.Google Scholar
. 1984. The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives 26(1). 45–67.Google Scholar
. 1988. Austronesian root theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. In Ward H. Goodenough (ed.), Prehistoric settlement of the Pacific, 117–140. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
. 1999. Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li (eds.), Selected papers from the eighth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office).Google Scholar
. 2003. Thao dictionary. Nankang: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office), Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
. 2009. The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert A. & Stephen Trussel. Ongoing. Austronesian comparative dictionary (online open access site at: [URL]).
Bradley, David. 2014. Languages and language families in China. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (preview), 16–20. Leiden: Brill. Online at [URL].Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Gary, Xuexiang Chen & Jianhua Wang. 2006. Shandong Jinan Changqingqu Yuezhuang faxian Houli wenhua shiqi de tanhuadao [Houli culture rice from the Yuezhuang site, Jinan, Shandong]. Dongfang Kaogu 31. 247–251.Google Scholar
Egerod, Søren. 1980. Atayal-English dictionary (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph 35). London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Ferrell, Raleigh. 1982. Paiwan dictionary (Pacific Linguistics C73). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Fey, Victoria. 1986. Amis dictionary. Republic of China: The Bible Society.Google Scholar
Fogg, Wayne H. 1983. Swidden cultivation of foxtail millet by Taiwan aborigines: A cultural analogue of the domestication of Setaria italica in China. In D. Keightley (ed.), The origins of Chinese civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q. 2011. Pathways to civilizations: Tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice cultures. Rice 4(3–4). 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, Robert H. & Wolfgang Behr. 2005. Antikchinesisch: Ein Lehrbuch in drei Teilen. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Alexi J. Drummond & Simon Greenhill. 2009. Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Nature 323(5913). 479–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handel, Zev. 2008. What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a field and a language family in flux. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3). 422–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happart, Gilbertus. 1896 [1650]. Woordboek der Favorlangsche Taal [Happart’s Favorlang vocabulary]. In W. Campbell (ed.), The articles of Christian instruction in Favorlang-Formosan Dutch and English, 122–199. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Company.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. 2011. An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Third Series) 21(4). 441–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 43(2). 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsing, Yue-ie. 2014. Both Setaria and Panicum were cultivated in Taiwan about five thousand years ago. Paper presented at the Symposium on Dispersion of people, crops, and language: Focusing on millets in Asia , Tachikawa, Japan, March 20.
Jacques, Guillaume. 2004. Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Diderot: Université Paris dissertation. [URL].Google Scholar
. Forthcoming. The genetic position of Chinese. In Wolfgang Behr & Zev Handel (eds.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics. Leiden: Brill.
Janhunen, Juha. 1996. Manchuria: An ethnic history (Mémoires de la société finno-ougrienne 222). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Joseph, U.V. & Robbins Burling. 2006. The comparative phonology of the Boro Garo languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Ko, Albert Min-Shan, Chung-Yu Chen, Qiaomei Fu, Frederick Delfin, Mingkun Li, Hung-Lin Chiu, Mark Stoneking & Ying-Chin Ko. 2014. Early Austronesians: Into and out of Taiwan. The American Journal of Human Genetics 94(3). 426–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Amy Pei-jung. 2009. Dorsal consonant harmony in Truku Sediq. Language and Linguistics 10(3). 569–591.Google Scholar
Li, Paul Jen-Kuei. 1977. The internal relationships of Rukai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 481. 1–92.Google Scholar
. 1995. Is Chinese genetically related to Austronesian? Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 93–112.Google Scholar
. 2004 [1985]. The position of Atayal in the Austronesian family. Selected papers on Formosan languages , 805–833. Nankang: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Li, Paul Jen-kuei & Shigeru Tsuchida. 2009. Yet more Proto-Austronesian infixes. In Bethwyn Evans (ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honor of Malcolm Ross, 245–362. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 605.Google Scholar
Lorrain, J. Herbert. 1940. Dictionary of the Lushai language. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A. 2003. Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry. 1994. Pharyngealization in Early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114(3). 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, Naoyoshi & Erin Asai. 1935. The myths and traditions of the Formosan native tribes. Taipei: Taihoku Imperial University.Google Scholar
Pan, Wuyun. 1995. Dui Hua-Ao yuxi jiashuo de ruogan zhichi cailiao [Some supporting materials for the Sino-Austronesian hypothesis]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (81). 113–144.Google Scholar
Pecoraro, Ferdinando. 1977. Essai de dictionnaire taroko-français. Cahier d’Archipel 7. Paris: S.E.C.M.I.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence. 1971. Philippine minor languages: Word lists and phonologies (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 8). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
. 1994. Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics 33(2). 323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. The current status of Austric. A review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. In L. Sagart, R. Blench & A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 134–160. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 1993a. Chinese and Austronesian: Evidence for a genetic relationship. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2111. 1–63.Google Scholar
. 1993b. L’infixe -r- en chinois archaique. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 88(1). 261–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1994. Old Chinese and Proto-Austronesian evidence for Sino-Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics 33(2). 271–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1995. Some remarks on the ancestry of Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 195–223.Google Scholar
. 1999. The roots of Old Chinese (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2002. Sino-Tibeto-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Canberra, January 8–11. [URL]
. 2005. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 161–176. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. The expansion of Setaria farmers in East Asia: A linguistic and archaeological model. In Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, Roger Blench, Malcolm Ross, Ilya Peiros & Marie Lin (eds.), Past human migrations in East Asia: matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 133–157. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2011a. Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: Making sense of non-final syllables. Paper presented at a symposium on Historical Linguistics in the Asia-Pacific Region and the Position of Japanese, Twentieth International Conference on Historical Lingusitics Symposium , National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, July 30. Available at [URL]
. 2011b. 华澳语系发源于何时何地 [The Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian homeland: Where and when?] (in Chinese). Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 51. 143–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Plusieurs cordes à leur arc. Paper presented at the Journée d’étude de la Société de Linguistique de Paris , Paris, Ecole Normale Supérieure, January 17.
Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1906. Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley. 1995. The Chinese-Austronesian connection: A view from the Austronesian morphology side. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 373–392.Google Scholar
. 2005. Proto-East Asian and the origin and dispersal of the languages of East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 182–198. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
STEDT (Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus). Online at [URL].
Thurgood, Graham. 2008. Han-Zang Yuyan de Puxi [The Sino-Tibetan languages: Genetic inheritance, external contact and change] (in Chinese). Minzu Yuwen 21. 3–15.Google Scholar
Tsang, Cheng-hwa, Li Kuang-ti & Chu Cheng-yi. 2006. Footprints of ancient people: Archaeological discoveries in the Tainan Science Park (in Chinese). Hsin Yin: Tainan County Cultural Bureau.Google Scholar
Tsuchida, Shigeru. 1976. Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology (Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa monograph series 5). Tokyo: Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.Google Scholar
Wolff, John U. 2010. Proto-Austronesian phonology with glossary, 2 vols1. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
Xing Gongwan. 1991. Guanyu Hanyu Nandaoyu de fashengxue guanxi wenti – L. Shajia’er Hanyu-Nandaoyu tongyuan lun shuping buzheng [On the question of the genetic relationship between Chinese and Austronesian – an evaluation and supplementation of L. Sagart’s Sino-Austronesian theory]. Minzu Yuwen 31. 1–14.Google Scholar
Yang Yuzhang, Li Weiya, Yao Ling, Cheng Zhijie, Zhang Juzhong & Xin Yingjun. 2015. 淀粉粒分析揭示的河南唐户遗址裴李岗文化古人类植物性食物资源利用 [Plant resources utilization at the Tanghu site during the Peiligang culture based on starch grain analysis, Henan Province]. 第四纪研究 [Quaternary Sciences] 35(1). 229–239.Google Scholar
Yuasa, Hiroshi. 2000. Segawa’s illustrated ethnography of indigenous Formosan people: The Tsou. Taipei: Southern Materials Center.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth. 2000. Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 39(2). 391–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang Jianping, Houyuan Lu, Wanfa Gu, Naiqin Wu, Kunshu Zhou, Yayi Hu, Yingjun Xin & Can Wang. 2012. Early mixed farming of millet and rice 7800 Years Ago in the Middle Yellow River Region, China. PLoS ONE 7(12). e52146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng-Zhang, Shangfang. 1995. Hanyu yu qinshuyu tongyuan genci ji fuzhui chengfen bijiaoshang de zedui wenti [The question of the selection of cognate roots and affixes between Chinese and related languages]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 269–282.Google Scholar