Cover not available
Article published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 33:2 (2016) ► pp.255–281

The wider connections of Austronesian

A response to Blust (2009)

Published online: 23 August 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.33.2.04sag
References
Adelaar, Karl Alexander
2011 Siraya: Retrieving the phonology, grammar and lexicon of a dormant Formosan language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baxter, William H. & Laurent Sagart
1997 Word formation in Old Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: Morphology, phonology and the lexicon in modern and ancient Chinese, 35–76. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2014 Old Chinese: A new reconstruction. New York: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, Peter
1997 Prehistory of the Indo-Malaysian Archipelago (revised edition). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
2005 First farmers: The origin of agricultural societies. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2013 First migrants. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul K.
1972 Sino-Tibetan: A conspectus. Cambridge: University Printing House. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Extra-Austronesian evidence for Formosan etyma. In Paul J.-K. Li, C.H Tsang, Y.-K. Huang, D.-A. Ho & C.Y. Tseng (eds.), Austronesian studies relating to Taiwan (Symposium series of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 3), 399–454. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert A.
1980 Austronesian etymologies. Oceanic Linguistics 191. 1–181.Google Scholar
1984 The Austronesian homeland: A linguistic perspective. Asian Perspectives 26(1). 45–67.Google Scholar
1988 Austronesian root theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996 Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. In Ward H. Goodenough (ed.), Prehistoric settlement of the Pacific, 117–140. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
1999 Subgrouping, circularity and extinction: Some issues in Austronesian comparative linguistics. In Elizabeth Zeitoun & Paul Jen-kuei Li (eds.), Selected papers from the eighth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, 31–94. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office).Google Scholar
2003 Thao dictionary. Nankang: Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office), Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
2009 The Austronesian languages. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert A. & Stephen Trussel
Ongoing. Austronesian comparative dictionary (online open access site at: [URL]).
Bradley, David
2014 Languages and language families in China. In Rint Sybesma (ed.), Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics (preview), 16–20. Leiden: Brill. Online at [URL].Google Scholar
Buck, Carl Darling
1949 A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principal Indo-European languages. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Gary, Xuexiang Chen & Jianhua Wang
2006 Shandong Jinan Changqingqu Yuezhuang faxian Houli wenhua shiqi de tanhuadao [Houli culture rice from the Yuezhuang site, Jinan, Shandong]. Dongfang Kaogu 31. 247–251.Google Scholar
Egerod, Søren
1980 Atayal-English dictionary (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph 35). London: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Ferrell, Raleigh
1982 Paiwan dictionary (Pacific Linguistics C73). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Fey, Victoria
1986 Amis dictionary. Republic of China: The Bible Society.Google Scholar
Fogg, Wayne H.
1983 Swidden cultivation of foxtail millet by Taiwan aborigines: A cultural analogue of the domestication of Setaria italica in China. In D. Keightley (ed.), The origins of Chinese civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, Dorian Q.
2011 Pathways to civilizations: Tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice cultures. Rice 4(3–4). 78–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gassmann, Robert H. & Wolfgang Behr
2005 Antikchinesisch: Ein Lehrbuch in drei Teilen. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gray, Russell D., Alexi J. Drummond & Simon Greenhill
2009 Language phylogenies reveal expansion pulses and pauses in Pacific settlement. Nature 323(5913). 479–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Handel, Zev
2008 What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a field and a language family in flux. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(3). 422–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Happart, Gilbertus
1896 [1650]. Woordboek der Favorlangsche Taal [Happart’s Favorlang vocabulary]. In W. Campbell (ed.), The articles of Christian instruction in Favorlang-Formosan Dutch and English, 122–199. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Company.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W.
2011 An inventory of Tibetan sound laws. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (Third Series) 21(4). 441–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 Cognates of Old Chinese *-n, *-r, and *-j in Tibetan and Burmese. Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 43(2). 91–109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hsing, Yue-ie
2014 Both Setaria and Panicum were cultivated in Taiwan about five thousand years ago. Paper presented at the Symposium on Dispersion of people, crops, and language: Focusing on millets in Asia , Tachikawa, Japan, March 20.
Jacques, Guillaume
2004 Phonologie et morphologie du Japhug (rGyalrong). Diderot: Université Paris dissertation. [URL].Google Scholar
Forthcoming. The genetic position of Chinese. In Wolfgang Behr & Zev Handel (eds.) Encyclopedia of Chinese language and linguistics Leiden Brill
Janhunen, Juha
1996 Manchuria: An ethnic history (Mémoires de la société finno-ougrienne 222). Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Joseph, U.V. & Robbins Burling
2006 The comparative phonology of the Boro Garo languages. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Ko, Albert Min-Shan, Chung-Yu Chen, Qiaomei Fu, Frederick Delfin, Mingkun Li, Hung-Lin Chiu, Mark Stoneking & Ying-Chin Ko
2014 Early Austronesians: Into and out of Taiwan. The American Journal of Human Genetics 94(3). 426–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Amy Pei-jung
2009 Dorsal consonant harmony in Truku Sediq. Language and Linguistics 10(3). 569–591.Google Scholar
Li, Paul Jen-Kuei
1977 The internal relationships of Rukai. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 481. 1–92.Google Scholar
1995 Is Chinese genetically related to Austronesian? Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 93–112.Google Scholar
2004 [1985] The position of Atayal in the Austronesian family. Selected papers on Formosan languages , 805–833. Nankang: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Li, Paul Jen-kuei & Shigeru Tsuchida
2009 Yet more Proto-Austronesian infixes. In Bethwyn Evans (ed.), Discovering history through language: Papers in honor of Malcolm Ross, 245–362. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 605.Google Scholar
Lorrain, J. Herbert
1940 Dictionary of the Lushai language. Calcutta: Asiatic Society.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
2003 Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry
1994 Pharyngealization in Early Chinese. Journal of the American Oriental Society 114(3). 397–408. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ogawa, Naoyoshi & Erin Asai
1935 The myths and traditions of the Formosan native tribes. Taipei: Taihoku Imperial University.Google Scholar
Pan, Wuyun
1995 Dui Hua-Ao yuxi jiashuo de ruogan zhichi cailiao [Some supporting materials for the Sino-Austronesian hypothesis]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (81). 113–144.Google Scholar
Pecoraro, Ferdinando
1977 Essai de dictionnaire taroko-français. Cahier d’Archipel 7. Paris: S.E.C.M.I.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence
1971 Philippine minor languages: Word lists and phonologies (Oceanic Linguistics Special Publication 8). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
1994 Morphological evidence for Austric. Oceanic Linguistics 33(2). 323–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 The current status of Austric. A review and evaluation of the lexical and morphosyntactic evidence. In L. Sagart, R. Blench & A. Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 134–160. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent
1993a Chinese and Austronesian: Evidence for a genetic relationship. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2111. 1–63.Google Scholar
1993b L’infixe -r- en chinois archaique. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 88(1). 261–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1994 Old Chinese and Proto-Austronesian evidence for Sino-Austronesian. Oceanic Linguistics 33(2). 271–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995 Some remarks on the ancestry of Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 195–223.Google Scholar
1999 The roots of Old Chinese (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 184). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 Sino-Tibeto-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics, Canberra, January 8–11. [URL]
2005 Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: An updated and improved argument. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 161–176. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 The expansion of Setaria farmers in East Asia: A linguistic and archaeological model. In Alicia Sanchez-Mazas, Roger Blench, Malcolm Ross, Ilya Peiros & Marie Lin (eds.), Past human migrations in East Asia: matching archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 133–157. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011a Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian: Making sense of non-final syllables. Paper presented at a symposium on Historical Linguistics in the Asia-Pacific Region and the Position of Japanese, Twentieth International Conference on Historical Lingusitics Symposium , National Museum of Ethnology, Osaka, July 30. Available at [URL]
2011b 华澳语系发源于何时何地 [The Sino-Tibetan-Austronesian homeland: Where and when?] (in Chinese). Communication on Contemporary Anthropology 51. 143–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Plusieurs cordes à leur arc. Paper presented at the Journée d’étude de la Société de Linguistique de Paris , Paris, Ecole Normale Supérieure, January 17.
Schmidt, Wilhelm
1906 Die Mon-Khmer Völker, ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zentralasiens und Austronesiens. Braunschweig: Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn.Google Scholar
Starosta, Stanley
1995 The Chinese-Austronesian connection: A view from the Austronesian morphology side. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 373–392.Google Scholar
2005 Proto-East Asian and the origin and dispersal of the languages of East and Southeast Asia and the Pacific. In Laurent Sagart, Roger Blench & Alicia Sanchez-Mazas (eds.), The peopling of East Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, 182–198. London: RoutledgeCurzon. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
STEDT (Sino-Tibetan Etymological Dictionary and Thesaurus)
Online at [URL].
Thurgood, Graham
2008 Han-Zang Yuyan de Puxi [The Sino-Tibetan languages: Genetic inheritance, external contact and change] (in Chinese). Minzu Yuwen 21. 3–15.Google Scholar
Tsang, Cheng-hwa, Li Kuang-ti & Chu Cheng-yi
2006 Footprints of ancient people: Archaeological discoveries in the Tainan Science Park (in Chinese). Hsin Yin: Tainan County Cultural Bureau.Google Scholar
Tsuchida, Shigeru
1976 Reconstruction of Proto-Tsouic phonology (Study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa monograph series 5). Tokyo: Tokyo Gaikokugo Daigaku.Google Scholar
Wolff, John U.
2010 Proto-Austronesian phonology with glossary, 2 vols1. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications.Google Scholar
Xing Gongwan
1991 Guanyu Hanyu Nandaoyu de fashengxue guanxi wenti – L. Shajia’er Hanyu-Nandaoyu tongyuan lun shuping buzheng [On the question of the genetic relationship between Chinese and Austronesian – an evaluation and supplementation of L. Sagart’s Sino-Austronesian theory]. Minzu Yuwen 31. 1–14.Google Scholar
Yang Yuzhang, Li Weiya, Yao Ling, Cheng Zhijie, Zhang Juzhong & Xin Yingjun
2015 淀粉粒分析揭示的河南唐户遗址裴李岗文化古人类植物性食物资源利用 [Plant resources utilization at the Tanghu site during the Peiligang culture based on starch grain analysis, Henan Province]. 第四纪研究 [Quaternary Sciences] 35(1). 229–239.Google Scholar
Yuasa, Hiroshi
2000 Segawa’s illustrated ethnography of indigenous Formosan people: The Tsou. Taipei: Southern Materials Center.Google Scholar
Zeitoun, Elizabeth
2000 Concerning ka-, an overlooked marker of verbal derivation in Formosan languages. Oceanic Linguistics 39(2). 391–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang Jianping, Houyuan Lu, Wanfa Gu, Naiqin Wu, Kunshu Zhou, Yayi Hu, Yingjun Xin & Can Wang
2012 Early mixed farming of millet and rice 7800 Years Ago in the Middle Yellow River Region, China. PLoS ONE 7(12). e52146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zheng-Zhang, Shangfang
1995 Hanyu yu qinshuyu tongyuan genci ji fuzhui chengfen bijiaoshang de zedui wenti [The question of the selection of cognate roots and affixes between Chinese and related languages]. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series 81. 269–282.Google Scholar