North Saami is replacing the use of possessive suffixes on nouns with a morphologically simpler analytic construction. Our data (>2K examples culled from >.5M words) track this change through three generations, covering parameters of semantics, syntax and geography. Intense contact pressure on this minority language probably promotes morphological simplification, yielding an advantage for the innovative construction. The innovative construction is additionally advantaged because it has a wider syntactic and semantic range and is indispensable, whereas its competitor can always be replaced. The one environment where the possessive suffix is most strongly retained even in the youngest generation is in the Nominative singular case, and here we find evidence that the possessive suffix is being reinterpreted as a Vocative case marker.
Abuladze, Lia & Andreas Ludden. 2013. The vocative in Georgian. In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 25–42. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Aikio, Ante, Laura Arola & Niina Kunnas. 2015. Variation in North Saami. In Dick Smakman & Patrick Heinrich (eds.), Globalising sociolinguistics: Challenging and expanding theory, 243–255. Oxford: Taylor and Francis.
Andersen, Henning. 2012. The new Russian vocative: Synchrony, diachrony, typology. Scando-Slavica 511. 122–167.
Antonsen, Lene, Laura A. Janda & Berit Anne Bals Baal. 2012. Njealji davvisámi adposišuvnna geavahus. The use of four North Saami adpositions. Sámi dieđalaš áigečála 2012(2). 7–38. Online at: [URL]
Antonsen, Lene & Laura A. Janda. 2015. Oamastanráhkadusat davvisámi girjjálašvuođas. The use of possessive constructions in North Saami prose. Dieđut 2015(2), 9–43.
Baayen, Harald R., Anna Endresen, Laura A. Janda, Anastasia Makarova & Tore Nesset. 2013. Space and time in Russian temporal expressions, a special issue of Russian Linguistics (37)3. 253–291. .
Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter. 2013. Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 31. 1–27.
Bethin, Christina Y. 2012. On paradigm uniformity and contrast in Russian vowel reduction. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(2). 425–63.
Blythe, Richard A. & William Croft. 2012. S-curves and the mechanisms of propagation in language change. Language 881. 269–304.
Collinder, Björn. 1960. Comparative grammar of the Uralic languages. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksells.
Collinder, Björn. 1965. An introduction to the Uralic languages. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Daniel, Michael & Andrew Spencer. 2009. The vocative – an outlier case. In Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of case, 626–634. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Endresen, Anna, Laura A. Janda, Robert Reynolds & Francis M. Tyers. 2016. Who needs particles? A challenge to the classification of particles as a part of speech in Russian. Russian Linguistics. 1–30. DOI .
Fink, Robert O. 1972. Person in nouns: Is the vocative a case?The American Journal of Philology 93(1). 61–68.
Greenberg, Robert D. 1996. The Balkan Slavic appellative. Munich: Lincom.
Grömping, Ulrike. 2009. Variable importance assessment in regression: Linear regression versus random forest. The American Statistician 63(4). 308–391.
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hill, Virginia. 2014. Vocatives: How syntax meets with pragmatics (Empirical Approaches to Linguistics Theory 5). Leiden: Brill.
Hoek, Karen van. 1995. Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language 711. 310–340.
Isačenko, Alexander. 1962. Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart: Formenlehre. Munich: Hueber.
Jakobson, Roman O. 1971. Zur Struktur des russischen Verbums. Roman Jakobson, selected writings. Vol. II1, 3–15. The Hague: Mouton.
Janda, Laura A. 1996. Back from the brink: A study of how relic forms in languages serve as source material for analogical extension (LINCOM Studies in Slavic Linguistics 01). Munich: LINCOM EUROPA.
Janda, Laura A., Lene Antonsen & Berit Anne Bals Baal. 2014. A Radial Category Profiling Analysis of North Sámi Ambipositions. In Benjamin Anible, Keiko Beers, Laura Hirrel & Deborah Wager (eds.), High Desert Linguistics Society Proceedings, 101. Online at: [URL]
Julien, Marit. 2014. Vokativar i norsk. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 321. 130–165.
Keskitalo, Pigga, Kaarina Määttä & Satu Uusiautti. 2013. Sámi education. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Kilgarriff, Adam. 2005. Language is never, ever, ever, random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1/21. 263–276.
Kiparsky, Valentin. 1967. Russische historische Grammatik, vol. 2. Die Entwicklung des Formensystems. Heidelberg: Winter.
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lass, Roger. 1990. How to do things with junk: Exaptation in language evolution. Linguistics 261. 79–102.
McWhorter, John H. 2007. Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McWhorter, John H. 2011. Linguistic simplicity and complexity: Why do languages undress? Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Michael, Lev. 2013. Possession in Nanti. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald & R.M.W. Dixon (eds.), Possession and ownership, 149–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mühlhäusler, Peter. 1977. Pidginisation and simplification of language. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.
Nesset, Tore & Laura A. Janda. 2010. Paradigm structure: Evidence from Russian suffix shift. Cognitive Linguistics 211. 699–725.
Nickel, Klaus Peter & Pekka Sammallahti. 2011. Nordsamisk grammatikk. Karasjok: Davvi Girji.
Nikolaeva, Irina. 2003. Possessive affixes as markers of information structuring: Evidence from Uralic. In Pirkko Suihkonen & Bernard Comrie (eds.), International symposium on deictic systems and quantification in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia, 130–145. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute of Evolutionary Anthropology and Udmurt State University.
Polinsky, Maria. 2006. Incomplete acquisition: American Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 141. 191–262.
R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, Online at: [URL]
Sammallahti, Pekka. 1998. The Saami languages: An introduction. Karasjok, Norway: Davvi Girji.
Sonnenhauser, Barbara & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna. 2013. Introduction: Vocative! In Barbara Sonnenhauser & Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna (eds.), Vocative! Addressing between system and performance (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 261), 1–23. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Stassen, Leon. 2013. Predicative possession. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Online at: [URL], Accessed on 2016-06-15.
Strobl, Carolin, James Malley, & Gerhard Tutz. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application, and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging, and random forests. Psychological Methods 141. 323–348.
Trudgill, Peter. 2002. Sociolinguistic variation and change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Trudgill, Peter. 2011. Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1980. Lingua mentalis: The semantics of natural language. Sydney: Academic Press.
Ylikoski, Jussi. 2009. Non-finites in North Saami. Helsinki: Société Finno-Ougrienne.
Ylikoski, Jussi. 2014. Davvisámegiela -ráigge – substantiiva, advearba, postposišuvdna vai kásus?. North Saami -ráigge-noun, adv, adverb, postposition or case?. Sámi dieđalaš áigeála 2014 (2).
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1985. Clitics and particles. Language 61(2). 283–305.
2018. Diagrammatic iconicity explains asymmetries in Paamese possessive constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 313 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.