Historical linguists have long been divided in their views about the mechanisms behind paradigm leveling, with many invoking a special mechanism related to a universal preference for paradigm uniformity while others attribute leveling to the same mechanism responsible for other types of analogical change. I argue that although ‘proportional’ analogical innovation plays a major role in paradigm leveling, it cannot account for all cases, and that something akin to the ‘interference’ mechanisms commonly associated with contamination and folk etymology account well for the non-proportional instances. I further show that all of the mechanisms involved in paradigm leveling are also implicated in other types of analogical change, and I argue against the need to posit any universal bias against (stem) allomorphy.
Ackerman, Farrell, James P. Blevins & Robert Malouf. 2009. Parts and wholes: Patterns of relatedness in complex morphological systems and why they matter. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), 54–82.
Ackerman, Farrell & Robert Malouf. Forthcoming. Implicative relations in word-based morphological systems. In Andrew Hippisley & Gregory Stump (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Albright, Adam C. 2002. The identification of bases in morphological paradigms. Ph.D. diss., University of California Los Angeles.
Albright, Adam. 2005. The morphological basis of paradigm leveling. In Downinget al. (2005b), 17–43.
Albright, Adam. 2010. Base-driven leveling in Yiddish verb paradigms. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 281. 475–537.
Albright, Adam. 2011. Paradigms. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 4: Phonological interfaces, 1972–2001. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Alderete, John R. 2001. Dominance effects as transderivational anti-faithfulness. Phonology 181. 201–253.
Andersen, Henning. 1980. Morphological change: Towards a typology. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology, 1–50. New York: Mouton.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1992. A-morphous morphology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Anderson, Stephen R. 2005. Morphological universals and diachrony. In Booij & van Marle (2005), 1–17.
Andersson, Erik. 1994. Swedish. In König & van der Auwera (1994), 271–312.
Aronoff, Mark. 1998. Isomorphism and monotonicity: Or the disease model of morphology. In Steven G. Lapointe, Diane K. Brentari & Patrick M. Farrell (eds.), Morphology and its relation to phonology and syntax, 411–418. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Aronoff, Mark. 1994. Morphology by itself. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Aronoff, Mark & Kirsten Fudeman. 2005. What is morphology? Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Askedal, John Ole. 1994. Norwegian. In König & van der Auwera (1994), 219–270.
Bauer, Laurie. 2003. Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bebermeyer, Renate. 1974. Zur Volksetymologie: Wesen und Formen. In Jochen Möckelmann (ed.), Sprache und Sprachhandeln: Festschrift für Gustav Bebermeyer, 156–187. Hildesheim: Olms.
Becker, Thomas. 1990. Analogie und morphologische Theorie. München: Fink.
Behaghel, Otto. 1886. Die deutsche Sprache. Leipzig: Freytag.
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1987. A structural paradox in lexical knowledge. In Elke van der Meer & Joachim Hoffmann (eds.), Knowledge aided information processing, 141–172. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Blevins, James P. 2003. Stems and paradigms. Language 791. 737–767.
Blevins, James P. 2004. Inflection classes and economy. In Gereon Müller, Lutz Gunkel & Gisela Zifonun (eds.), Explorations in nominal inflection, 41–85. New York: de Gruyter.
Blevins, James P. 2006. Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics 42(3). 531–5.
Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins. 2009a. Introduction: Analogy in grammar. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), 1–12.
Blevins, James P. & Juliette Blevins (eds.). 2009b. Analogy in grammar: Form and acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blevins, Juliette. 2004. Evolutionary phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: Remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001, 53–85. Berlin: Springer.
Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booij, Geert & Jaap van Marle (eds.). 2005. Yearbook of Morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Springer.
Broe, Michael & Janet Pierrehumbert (eds.). 2000. Papers in Laboratory Phonology 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brugmann, Karl. 1876. Nasalis Sonans in der indogermanischen Grundsprache. In Georg Curtius & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Studien zur griechischen und lateinischen Grammatik, vol. 91, 285–338. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Burzio, Luigi. 2005. Sources of paradigm uniformity. In Downinget al. (2005b), 65–106.
Bybee, Joan. 1980. Morphophonemic change from inside and outside the paradigm. Lingua 501. 45–59.
Bybee, Joan. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Michael Hammond & Michael Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 119–141. New York: Academic Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2000. Lexicalization of sound change and alternating environments. In Broe & Pierrehumbert (2000), 250–268.
Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan. 2015. Language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, Joan L. & Carol Lynn Moder. 1983. Morphological classes as natural categories. Language 591. 251–270.
Bybee, Joan L. & Jean E. Newman. 1995. Are stem changes as natural as affixes?Linguistics 331, 633–654.
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins & William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Campbell, Alistair. 1959. Old English grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
Campbell, Lyle. 2004. Historical linguistics: An introduction, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2008. System-congruity and violable constraints in German weak declension. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 261. 775–793.
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew. 2010. The evolution of morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chirita, Diana. 1988. Der Ausgleich des Ablauts im starken Präteritum im Frühneuhochdeutschen. New York: Lang.
Chomsky, Noam & Morris Halle. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.
Christmann, Ernst. 1937. Zur Frage der Volksetymologie. Zeitschrift für Mundartforschung 13(1). 1–8.
Clark, Eve V. 1987. The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. In Brian MacWhinney (ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition, 1–33. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Coates, Richard. 1987. Pragmatic sources of analogical reformation. Journal of Linguistics 231. 319–340.
Curtius, Georg. 1860. Das dreisilbengesetz der griechischen und lateinischen betonung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 91. 321–338.
Davies, Anna Morpurgo. 1978. Analogy, segmentation, and the early Neogrammarians. Transactions of the Philological Society 76(1). 36–60.
Davis, Stuart. 2005. Capitalistic v. militaristic: The paradigm uniformity effect reconsidered. In Downinget al. (2005b), 107–121.
Downing, Laura J., Tracy A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen. 2005a. Introduction: The role of paradigms in phonological theory. In Downinget al. (2005b), 1–16.
Downing, Laura J., Tracy A. Hall & Renate Raffelsiefen (eds.). 2005b. Paradigms in phonological theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dresher, B. Elan. 2000. Analogical levelling of vowel length in West Germanic. In Lahiri (2000b), 47–70.
Fertig, David. 2000. Morphological change up close. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Fertig, David. 2013. Analogy and morphological change. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Fertig, David. 2015. Two conceptions of analogical innovation/change. In Peter Auer & Robert W. Murray (eds.), Hermann Paul’s ‘Principles of language history’ revisited, 209–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Fertig, David. 2016. Staying weird: Analogical change in high-frequency forms. Talk presented at the
22nd Germanic Linguistics Annual Conference
, Reykjavík, Iceland, May 20, 2016.
Flemming, Edward. 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.
Gaeta, Livio. 2007. Is analogy economic? In Fabio Montermini, Gilles Boyé & Nabil Hathout (eds.), Selected proceedings of the 5th Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, 20–33. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Gaeta, Livio. 2010. Analogical change. In Silvia Luraghi & Vit Bubenik (eds.), The Continuum companion to historical linguistics, 147–160. London: Continuum.
Garrett, Andrew. 2008. Paradigmatic uniformity and markedness. In Good (2008b), 125–143.
Garrett, Andrew & Keith Johnson. 2013. Phonetic bias in sound change. In Alan C.L. Yu (ed.), Origins of sound change, 51–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gerken, LouAnn, Rachel Wilson, Rebecca Gómez & Erika Nurmsoo. 2009. The relation between linguistic analogies and lexical categories. In Blevins & Blevins (2009b), 101–117.
Godfrey, Elizabeth & Sali Tagliamonte. 1999. Another piece for the verbal s story: Evidence from Devon in southwest England. Language Variation and Change 111. 87–121.
Good, Jeff. 2008a. Introduction. In Good (2008b), 1–19.
Good, Jeff (ed.). 2008b. Linguistic universals and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Synchronic and diachronic universals in phonology. Language 421. 508–517.
Haberland, Hartmut. 1994. Danish. In König & van der Auwera (1994), 313–348.
Hale, Mark & Charles Reiss. 2008. The phonological enterprise. New York: Oxford University Press.
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The view from Building 201, 111–171. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harris, James W. 1973. On the order of certain phonological rules in Spanish. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, 59–76. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Haspelmath, Martin. 2006. Against markedness (and what to replace it with). Journal of Linguistics 42(1). 25–70.
Hempen, Ute. 1988. Die starken Verben im Deutschen und Niederländischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Hermann, Eduard. 1931. Lautgesetz und Analogie (Abhandlungen der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen, Philologisch-Historische Klasse, neue Folge 23, 3). Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung.
Hock, Hans Henrich. 1991. Principles of historical linguistics, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hock, Hans H. & Brian D. Joseph. 2009. Language history, language change, and language relationship, 2nd edn. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hockett, Charles F. 1954. Two models of grammatical description. Word 101. 210–234. [Reprinted in Martin Joos (ed.). 1963. Readings in linguistics, 386–399. New York: American Council of Learned Societies.].
Iverson, Gregory K. & Joseph C. Salmons. 2004. The conundrum of Old Norse umlaut: Sound change versus crisis analogy. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 161. 77–110.
Jeffers, Robert J. & Ilse Lehiste. 1979. Principles and methods for historical linguistics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1887. Zur Lautgesetzfrage. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 31. 188–216.
Joseph, Brian D. 1998. Diachronic morphology. In Andrew Spencer & Arnold M. Zwicky (eds.), The handbook of morphology, 351–373. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. 2013. Conspiring to mean: Experimental and computational evidence for a usage-based harmonic approach to morphophonology. Language 891. 110–148.
Kenstowicz, Michael & Charles Kisseberth. 1977. Topics in phonological theory. New York: Academic Press.
Kenstowicz, Michael. 2005. Paradigmatic uniformity and contrast. In Downinget al. (2005b), 145–169.
King, Robert D. 1973. Rule insertion. Language 491. 551–578.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1968. Linguistic universals and linguistic change. In Emmon Bach & Robert T. Harms (eds.), Universals in linguistic theory, 170–202. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1972. Explanation in phonology. In Stanley Peters (ed.), Goals of lingusitic theory, 189–227. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1978. Analogical change as a problem for linguistic theory. In Braj B. Kachru (ed.), Linguistics in the seventies: Directions and prospects, 77–96. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1992. Analogy. In William Bright (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics, vol. 11, 56–61. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kiparsky, Paul. 2000. Opacity and cyclicity. The Linguistic Review 171. 351–366.
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera (eds.). 1994. The Germanic languages. London: Routledge.
Krahe, Hans & Wolfgang Meid. 1969. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft II: Formenlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Kruszewski, Mikołaj. 1884–1890. Prinzipien der Sprachentwickelung. Internationale Zeitschrift für allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 1(1884). 295–307; 2(1885). 258–268; 3(1887). 145–187; 5(1890). 133–144, 339–360.
Lahiri, Aditi. 2000a. Introduction. In Lahiri (2000b), 1–14.
Lahiri, Aditi (ed.). 2000b. Analogy, levelling, markedness: Principles of change in phonology and morphology. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lehmann, Winfried. 1962. Historical linguistics: An introduction. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Lieber, Rochelle. 1992. Deconstructing morphology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Linell, Per. 1979. Psychological reality in phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luiten, Tyler, Andrea Menz, John M. Lindner & Joseph Salmons. 2013. Beyond the handbooks: A quantitative approach to Old High German phonology and morphology. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 135(1). 2–20.
Maiden, Martin. 2005. Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Booij & van Marle (2005), 137–175.
Mańczak, Witold. 1958. Tendences générales des changements analogiques. Lingua 71. 298–325, 387–420.
Matthews, Peter H. 1972. Inflectional morphology: A theoretical study based on aspects of Latin verb conjugation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John J. 2005. Optimal paradigms. In Downinget al. (2005b), 170–210.
Mengden, Ferdinand von. 2011. Ablaut or transfixation? On the Old English strong verbs. In Renate Bauer & Ulrike Krischke (eds.), More than words: English lexicography and lexicology past and present, 123–139. New York: Lang.
Misteli, Franz. 1880. Lautgesetz und Analogie. Zeitschrift für Völkerpsychologie und Sprachwissenschaft 111. 365–475.
Nübling, Damaris. 2000. Prinzipien der Irregularisierung. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Nübling, Damaris. 2008. Was tun mit Flexionsklassen? Deklinationsklassen und ihr Wandel im Deutschen und seinen Dialekten. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 751. 282–331.
Oertel, Hanns. 1901. Lectures on the study of language. New York: Scribner’s.
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Carrie S. Masek, Roberta A. Hendrick & Mary Frances Miller (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Olschansky, Heike. 1996. Volksetymologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Osthoff, Hermann. 1878. Kleine beiträge zur declinationslehre der indogermanischen sprachen, pt. 1. In Hermann Osthoff & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 11, 207–290. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Osthoff, Hermann. 1879a. Das physiologische und psychologische Moment in der sprachlichen Formenbildung. In Rudolf Birchow & Franz von Holtzendorff (eds.), Sammlung gemeinverständlicher wissenschaftlicher Vorträge, vol. 14, no. 337, 505–552. Berlin: Habel.
Osthoff, Hermann. 1879b. Kleine beiträge zur declinationslehre der indogermanischen sprachen II. In Hermann Osthoff & Karl Brugmann (eds.), Morphologische Untersuchungen auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen, vol. 21, 1–147. Leipzig: Hirzel.
Panagl, Oswald. 1982. Aspekte der Volksetymologie (Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft, Vorträge und Kleinere Schriften 30). Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.
Paul, Hermann. 1877. Die Vocale der Flexions- und Ableitungs-Silben in den aeltesten germanischen Dialecten. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 41. 315–475.
Paul, Hermann. 1886. Principien der Sprachgeschichte, 2nd edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
Paul, Hermann. 1917. Deutsche Grammatik, vol. 21. Halle: Niemeyer.
Paul, Hermann. 1920. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte, 5th edn. Halle: Niemeyer.
Paul, Hermann. 1989. Mittelhochdeutsche Grammatik, 23rd edn., ed. by Peter Wiehl & Siegfried Grosse. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules. New York: HarperCollins.
Prokosch, Edward. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America.
Ringe, Don. 2006. A linguistic history of English, vol. 1: From Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robins, Robert H. 1959. In defence of WP. Transactions of the Philological Society 581. 116–144.
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke. 2002. Volksetymologie und Paronomasie als lautnachahmende Wortschöpfung. In Mechthild Habermann, Peter O. Müller & Horst Haider Munske (eds.), Historische Wortbildung des Deutschen, 105–127. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Rundblad, Gabriella & David B. Kronenfeld. 2003. The inevitability of folk etymology: A case of collective reality and invisible hands. Journal of Pragmatics 351. 119–138.
Salmons, Joseph. 2012. A history of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Samuels, M.L. 1972. Linguistic evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1995 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by Charles Bally & Albert Sechehaye. Paris: Payot.
Schirmunski, V.M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1885. Über die Lautgesetze: Gegen die Junggrammatiker. Berlin: Robert Oppenheim. [Reprinted in Vennemann & Wilbur (1972), 1–38; English translation 41–72.].
Trommer, Jochen. 2012. Constraints on multiple-feature mutation. Lingua 1221. 1182–1192.
Ullmann, Stephen. 1957. The principles of semantics, 2nd edn. New York: Barnes and Noble.
Vennemann, Theo. 1974. Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Anthony Bruck, Robert A. Fox & Michael W. LaGaly (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, 346–374. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Vennemann, Theo. 1999. Volksetymologie und Ortsnamenforschung. Beiträge zur Namenforschung 34(3). 269–322.
Vennemann, Theo & Terence H. Wilbur (eds.). 1972. Schuchardt, the Neogrammarians, and the transformational theory of phonological change. Frankfurt: Athenäum.
Wheeler, Benjamin Ide. 1887. Analogy and the scope of its application in language. Ithaca, NY: John Wilson and Son University Press.
Wolf, Matthew. 2007. For an autosegmental theory of mutation. In Leah Bateman, Adam Werle, Michael O’Keefe & Ehren Reilly (eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics 321, 315–404. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900. Völkerpsychologie, vol. 1: Die Sprache, part 1. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1984. Flexionsmorphologie und Natürlichkeit. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989a. Inflectional Morphology and Naturalness. Boston: Kluwer [Translation of Wurzel 1984].
Wurzel, Wolfgang Ullrich. 1989b. Von der Inadäquatheit einer Affixmorphologie. Linguistische Studien, Reihe A 1941. 277–298.
Zager, David. 1980. A real time process model of morphological change. Ph.D. diss., University at Buffalo (SUNY).
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1990. Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Hans C. Luschützky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & John R. Rennison (eds.), Contemporary morphology, 217–236. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
ESHER, LOUISE
2024. The intricate inflectional relationships underpinning morphological analogy. Journal of Linguistics 60:2 ► pp. 285 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2023. Retrospect and Prospect. Annual Review of Linguistics 9:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
2021. Hochfrequenz und Irregularität – zur Stammallomorphie bei (a)frz. al(l)er/(a)it. andare, (a)frz. venir/(a)it. venire und afrz. ester/(a)it. stare
. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 137:4 ► pp. 961 ff.
2020. The não interpolation in Classical and early Modern European Portuguese and the mapping between syntactic and phonological structures: An empirical study
. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff.
Axelsdóttir, Katrín
2019. Áhrifsbreytingar í þágufalli nafnsins Þórarinn. Orð og tunga 21 ► pp. 27 ff.
Fertig, David
2019. Morphological Change Through Phonological Analogy: 2nd Person Singular -s→ -stand Related Developments in Germanic. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Haugen, Tor Arne & Hans-Olav Enger
2019. The semantics of Scandinavian pancake constructions. Linguistics 57:3 ► pp. 531 ff.
Hill, Eugen
2019. Inflectional Suppletion and Heteroclite Inflection from a Diachronic Perspective. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:3 ► pp. 372 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.