Article published in:
Diachronica
Vol. 34:2 (2017) ► pp. 253–277

Areal features of Hittite conditionals

Consequences for the reconstruction of Indo-European

| University of Ljubljana
Hittite conditionals exhibit some morphosyntactic peculiarities which are not yet fully understood, such as the conditional conjunction takku derived from a demonstrative plus “and”, some unexpected alternations from past to present and the irrealis particle (-)man used in hypothetical, potential and contrary-to-fact conditionals. Cross-linguistically these features are not frequent, and inheritance from Proto-Indo-European cannot be claimed. A close look into the syntax and semantics of (Peripheral) Akkadian and Sumerian reveals that they may be innovations due to language contact between Hittite and Semitic languages. This fact deserves appropriate consideration in the reconstruction of Proto-Anatolian and Proto-Indo-European.
Keywords: Hittite, Indo-European mood, Semitic, language contact, linguistic areas, subordination, conditional sentences
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Hittite conditionals
  • 3. takku conditionals in Laws and omen texts
  • 4.Tense alternations in counterfactuals
  • 5.The modal particle (-)man
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 20 July 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.34.2.04zor
References

References

Aistleitner, Joseph & Otto Eißfeldt
1963 Wörterbuch der ugaritischen Sprache. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Beckman, Gary M.
1983 Mesopotamians and Mesopotamian learning at Hattuša. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 351. 97–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 Under the spell of Babylon: Mesopotamian influence on the religion of the Hittites. In Joan Aruz, Sarah B. Graff & Yelena Rakic (eds.), Cultures in contact: From Mesopotamia to the Mediterranean in the second millennium B.C., 284–297. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art / New Haven, CN: Yale Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Brockelmann, Carl
1961 Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen I, II. Hildesheim: Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins, & William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Cohen Eran
2000 Akkadian -ma in diachronic perspective. Zeitschrift für Assyriologie 901. 207–226.Google Scholar
Cohen, Eran
2012 Conditional structures in Mesopotamian Old Babylonian. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Cotticelli Kurras, Paola
2001 Textlinguistische Annäherungen in den hethitischen Erzähltexten. In Onfrio Carruba & Wolfgang Meid (eds.), Anatolisch und Indogermanisch: Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Pavia, 22.–25. September 1998, 43–46. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W.
2009 The semantics of clause linking in typological perspective. In R. M. W. Dixon & Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (eds.), The semantics of clause linking: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunkel, George
2014 Lexikon der idg: Partikeln und Pronominalstämme, vol. 2: Lexikon. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Edzard, Dietz Otto
2003 Sumerian grammar. Leiden [etc.]: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eichner, Heiner
1971 Urindogermanisch *kʷe „wenn“ im Hethitischen. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 291. 27–46.Google Scholar
Fincke, Jeanette C.
2009 Zu den akkadischen Hemerologien aus Ḫattuša (CTH 546). Teil I: Eine Hemerologie für das „Rufen von Klagen“ (šigû šasû) und das „Reinigen seines Gewandes“ (ṣubāt-su ubbubu): KUB 4, 46 (+) KUB 43, 1. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 611. 111–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Finet, André
1956 L’accadien des lettres de Mari. Bruxelles: Palais des académies.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Johannes
1927 Zum hethitischen Irrealis und Potentialis. Kleinasiatische Forschungen 11. 286–296.Google Scholar
1991 Kurzgefasstes hethitisches Wörterbuch. Unveränderter Nachdruck der Ausgabe 1952–1966. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar
Gordin, Shai
2014 The sociohistorical setting of Hittite schools of writing as reflected in scribal habits. In Shai Gordin (ed.), Visualizing knowledge and creating meaning in ancient writing systems, 57–80. Gladbeck: PeWe-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hahn, Adelaide E.
1944 The shift of a Hittite conjunction from the temporal to the conditional sphere. Language 20(3). 91–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich
1988 Untersuchungen zur Hypotaxe im Vedischen. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A., Jr.
1982 Hittite man and nūman . In Erich Neu (ed.), Investigationes philologicae et comparativae: Gedenkschrift für Heinz Kronasser, 38‒45. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
1997 The laws of the Hittites. Leiden [etc.]: Brill.Google Scholar
Hoffner, Harry A., Jr. & Craig H. Melchert
2008 A grammar of the Hittite language. Part 1: Reference grammar. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Hout, Theo van den
1994 Träume einer hethitischen Königin: KUB LX 97+XXXI 71. Altorientalische Forschungen 211. 305–327. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huehnergard, John
1979 The Akkadian dialects of Carchemish and Ugarit. Cambridge, MA: Harvard dissertation.Google Scholar
2000 A grammar of Akkadian. 3rd printing, with corrections. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Kienast, Burkhart, Erhart Graefe & Gene B. Gragg
2001 Historische semitische Sprachwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kloekhorst, Alwin
2008 Etymological dictionary of the Hittite inherited lexicon. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Krebernik, Manfred & Michael P. Streck
2001  šumman lā qabi’āt ana balāṭim … Wärst du nicht zum Leben berufen … Der Irrealis im Altbabylonischen. In Bartelmus Rüdiger & Norbert Nebes (eds.), Sachverhalt und Zeitbezug: Semitistische und alttestamentliche Studien Adolf Denz zum 65. Geburtstag, 51–78. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kühner, Raphael & Carl Stegmann
1988 Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. T. 2. Satzlehre. Bd. 2. Reprograph. Nachdr. d. 2., neubearb. Aufl. Hannover, Hahn, 1914. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Labat, René
1932 L’akkadien de Bogaz-köi. Bordeaux: Librairie Delmas.Google Scholar
Laneri, Nicola & Mark Schwartz
2011 Southeastern and Eastern Anatolia in the Middle Bronze Age. The Oxford handbook of ancient Anatolia: (10,000–323 bce). Oxford Handbooks Online, EBSCOhost (17 August 2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1984 Conditional clauses in the early Indo-European dialects. In Alberto Pajares Bernabé [ et al.] (eds.), Athlon: Satura grammatica in honorem Francisci R. Adrados, vol. 11, 235–244. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Lühr, Rosemarie
1998 Einräumung und Zugeständnis. Skalare und universale konzessive Konditionalsätze im Hethitischen. In Jiří Prosecký (ed.), Intellectual life of the Ancient Near East. Papers presented at the 43rd Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale, Prague, 1–5 July 1996, 221‒230. Prague: Oriental Institute.
2001 Zum Modalfeld im Hethitischen. In Onfrio Carruba & Wolfgan Meid (eds.), Anatolisch und Indogermanisch: Akten des Kolloquiums der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft, Pavia, 22.–25. September 1998, 239–262. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen.Google Scholar
Moscati, Sabatino
(ed.) 1964 An introduction to comparative grammar of Semitic languages: Phonology and morphology. Wiesbaden: Harassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Moran, William L.
1953 Amarna šumma in main clauses. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 7(3). 78–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pinches, Theophilus G.
1910 An outline of Assyrian grammar. London: H.J. Glaisher.Google Scholar
Puhvel, Jaan
1984– Hittite etymological dictionary. Berlin: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rieken, Elisabeth
1999 Zur Verwendung der Konjunktion ta in den hethitischen Texten. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 591. 63–88.Google Scholar
Riemschneider, Kaspar K.
1970 Babylonische Geburtsomina in hethitischer Übersetzung. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrasowitz.Google Scholar
Roth, Martha T.
1995 Law collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Rubio, Gonzalo
2009 Semitic influence in the history of Latin syntax. In Pierluigi Cuzzolin & Philip Baldi (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Part 1: Syntax of the sentence, 195–239. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rutz, Matthew T.
2012 Mesopotamian scholarship in Hattusa and the Sammeltafel KUB 4.53. Journal of the American Oriental Society 132(2). 171–188. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sakel, Jeanette
2007 Types of loan: Matter and pattern. In Jeanette Sakel & Yaron Matras (eds.), Grammatical borrowing in cross-linguistic perspective (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 38), 15–29. New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1920 Greek grammar for colleges. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar
Soden, Wolfram von & Werner R. Mayer
1995 Grundriss der akkadischen Grammatik. Roma: Editrice Pontifico Istituto Biblico.Google Scholar
Soldt, Wilfred H. van
1991 Studies in the Akkadian of Ugarit: Dating and grammar. Kevelaer: Butzon & Bercker / Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener Verlag.Google Scholar
Sommer, Ferdinand
1948 Hethiter und Hethitisch. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Speiser, Ephraim A.
1947 A note on the derivation of šumma . Journal of Cuneiform Studies 11. 321–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sternemann, Reinhard
1965 Temporale und konditionale Nebensätze des Hethitischen. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Orientforschung 111. 231–274, 377–415.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G.
2001 Language contact. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tischler, Johann & Günter Neumann
1977– Hethitisches etymologisches Glossar. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Traugott Closs, Elizabeth
1985 Conditional markers. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax: Proceedings of a symposium on iconicity in syntax, Stanford, 24–26 June 1983, 289–311. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Viti, Carlotta
2007 Strategies of subordination in Vedic. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Wasserman, Nathan
2012 Most probably: Epistemic modality in Old Babylonian. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert
1963 Preliminaries to a historical and comparative analysis of the syntax of the Old Irish verb. Celtica 61. 1–49.Google Scholar
1985 Indo-European *-kwe “and” in Hittite. In Ölberg, Hermann M. & Gernot Schmidt (eds.), Sprachwissenschaftliche Forschungen. Festschrift für Johann Knobloch zum 65. Geburtstag am 5. Januar 1984, dargebracht von Freunden und Kollegen, 491–497. Innsbruck: Inst. für Sprachwissenschaft der Univ. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Weeden, Mark
2011 Hittite logograms and Hittite scholarship. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Zorman, Marina
2016 Modal construction with man in Hittite and Akkadian. Journal of Indo-European Studies 44(3–4). 1–11.Google Scholar