Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 6:1 (1989) ► pp.141–150
Book review

Kil Wun Kang. Hankwuk-e Kye Thong Non [Issues on the origin of the Korean language]. Seoul: Yeng Sel Chulphansa, 1988. x, 825 pp.

Reviewed by
| Indiana University
Published online: 1 January 1989
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.6.1.11kri
References (40)
References
Andronov, Mikhail S. 1970. Dravidian Languages. Translated from Russian by D. M. Segal. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E., ed. 1972. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Seminar of Tamil Studies, Madras 1968. Madras: International Association of Tamil Research.Google Scholar
Batchelor, John. 1889. An Ainu-English-Japanese Dictionary. Tokyo: Y. Kumata. (Repr., Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, 1938 and 1981).Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes. 1955. Die tungusischen Sprachen. Versuch einer verglei-chenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl. 1953. “Dravidisch und Ural-Altaisch”. UAJ 251.161–173.Google Scholar
Burrow, Thomas & Murray B. Emeneau. 1961. A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert. 1856. A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indic Family of Language. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp., 1974.Google Scholar
Charency, Félix H. 1894. Le folklore dans les deux mondes. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chiri, Mashio. 1956. Ainugo Nymon [An Ainu Primer]. Sapporo: Nire Shobo.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges. 1937. “Morphologie comparée et phonétique comparée”. BSLP 381.123–138.Google Scholar
Haguenauer, Charles. 1936. Review of Koppelmann (1933b). Journal Asia-tique 2281.347–348.Google Scholar
Hulbert, Homer B. 1905. A Comparative Grammar of the Korean Language and the Dravidian Dialects of India. Seoul: The Methodist Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1942. “The Paleosiberian Languages”. American Anthrop-ologist 441.602–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
et al., eds. 1959. Paleosiberian Peoples and Languages: A bibliographie guide. New Haven: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha. 1977. Samojedischer Wortschatz. Helsinki: Castrenianumin toimitteita.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha & Songmoo Kho. 1982. “Is Korean Related to Tungusic?” Hankul 1771.179–190.Google Scholar
Kang, Kil Wun. 1982. “Hankwuk-e wa ui Pikyo. [A Comparison of Korean and Ainu),]”. Emwun Yenkwu 111.1–90.Google Scholar
. 1983. “Hankwuk-e wa Kilyak-e-nun Thongkye ita [Korean and Gilyak are related]”. Hankul 1821.103–141.Google Scholar
Kho, Songmoo. 1973. Korean kielen ja Uralilaisten kielten valinen etymologinen nertailu [The etymological connection between Korean and Uralic]. Helsinki: Laudatur tutkielma.Google Scholar
Kim, Panghan. 1977. “Hankwuk-e Ehui Pikyo Mwunce Cem [Some problems on the comparative study of Korean with the Altaic languages]”. Chosen Gakuhō. 831.1–22.Google Scholar
Kim, Sayeup. 1974. Kodai Chōsengo to Nihongo [Old Korean and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Koppelmann, Heinrich. 1933a. “Die Verwandtschaft des Koreanischen und der Ainu-Sprache mit den indogermanischen Sprachen”. Anthropos 231.199–234.Google Scholar
. 1933b. Die eurasische Sprachfamilie: Indogermanischf Koreanisch und Verwandtes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kreinovich, Evgenij A. 1955. “Gilijatsko-Tunguso-Manchzhurske jazykovie paralleli”. Doklady i soobschenija Instituta jazykoznanija No.81.135–167.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H. 1964. “Altajisch und Dravidisch”. Orbis 131.66–103.Google Scholar
1984. “Korean and Altaic – A preliminary sketch”. Central Asiatic Journal 283/4.234–295.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew. 1984. “Korean and Altaic”. Journal of Korean Studies 51:143–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moellendorff, Paul Georg von. 1894. “The Ghilyak Language”. The China Review 211.141–146.Google Scholar
Naert, Pierre. 1962. “Contacts lexicaux aïnou-gilyak”. Orbis 111.199–229.Google Scholar
Patrie, James. 1982. The Genetic Relationship of the Ainu Language. Hono-lulu: Univ. Press of Haiwaii.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas. 1955. Introduction to Mongolian Comparative Studies. (= MSFOu , 1101.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten. 1986. The Ainu Language: The morphology and syntax of the Shizunai dialect. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarthus Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rosny, Léon de. 1864. Aperçu de la langue coréenne. Paris: Imprimerie im-périale.Google Scholar
. 1867. Des affinités du japonais. Paris: Imprimerie Moquet.Google Scholar
Rozycki, William Vincent. 1983. Mongol Elements in Manchu. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Uralic and Altaic Studies, Indiana Univ.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. Wilhelm. 1926. Die Sprachfamilien und Sprachenkreise der Erde. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Leo. 1929. “The Ainu Problem”. Anthropos 241.755–799.Google Scholar
Tsintsius, V. I. et al., eds. 1975–1977. Spravniîel’ nyj slovar’ tunguso-man-chzhurskix jazykov: Materialy k etymologicheskom slovarju. 21 vols. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Whitman, John Bradford. 1985. The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Lin-guistics, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
Worth, Dean. 1963. “Paleosiberian”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. I1: Soviet and East European Linguistics , 345–373. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krippes, Karl A.
1994. Review of Starostin (1991): Altajskaja problema i proiskhozhdenie japonskogo jazyka. Diachronica 11:2 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.