Cover not available
Review published In:
Diachronica
Vol. 6:1 (1989) ► pp.141–150
Book review

Kil Wun Kang. Hankwuk-e Kye Thong Non
[Issues on the origin of the Korean language]. Seoul: Yeng Sel Chulphansa, 1988. x, 825 pp.

Reviewed by
| Indiana University
Published online: 1 January 1989
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.6.1.11kri
References
Andronov, Mikhail S.
1970 Dravidian Languages. Translated from Russian by D. M. Segal. Moscow: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Asher, Ronald E.
ed. 1972 Proceedings of the Second International Conference Seminar of Tamil Studies, Madras 1968. Madras: International Association of Tamil Research.Google Scholar
Batchelor, John
1889 An Ainu-English-Japanese Dictionary. Tokyo: Y. Kumata. (Repr., Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten 1938 and 1981).Google Scholar
Benzing, Johannes
1955 Die tungusischen Sprachen. Versuch einer verglei-chenden Grammatik. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Bouda, Karl
1953 “Dravidisch und Ural-Altaisch”. UAJ 251.161–173.Google Scholar
Burrow, Thomas & Murray B. Emeneau
1961 A Dravidian Etymological Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Caldwell, Robert
1856 A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indic Family of Language. 3rd ed. New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp 1974.Google Scholar
Charency, Félix H.
1894 Le folklore dans les deux mondes. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Chiri, Mashio
1956 Ainugo Nymon [An Ainu Primer]. Sapporo: Nire Shobo.Google Scholar
Dumézil, Georges
1937 “Morphologie comparée et phonétique comparée”. BSLP 381.123–138.Google Scholar
Haguenauer, Charles
1936 Review of Koppelmann (1933b). Journal Asia-tique 2281.347–348.Google Scholar
Hulbert, Homer B.
1905 A Comparative Grammar of the Korean Language and the Dravidian Dialects of India. Seoul: The Methodist Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1942 “The Paleosiberian Languages”. American Anthrop-ologist 441.602–620. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
et al. eds. 1959 Paleosiberian Peoples and Languages: A bibliographie guide. New Haven: HRAF Press.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha
1977 Samojedischer Wortschatz. Helsinki: Castrenianumin toimitteita.Google Scholar
Janhunen, Juha & Songmoo Kho
1982 “Is Korean Related to Tungusic?” Hankul 1771.179–190.Google Scholar
Kang, Kil Wun
1982 “Hankwuk-e wa ui Pikyo. [A Comparison of Korean and Ainu),]”. Emwun Yenkwu 111.1–90.Google Scholar
1983 “Hankwuk-e wa Kilyak-e-nun Thongkye ita [Korean and Gilyak are related]”. Hankul 1821.103–141.Google Scholar
Kho, Songmoo
1973 Korean kielen ja Uralilaisten kielten valinen etymologinen nertailu [The etymological connection between Korean and Uralic]. Helsinki: Laudatur tutkielma.Google Scholar
Kim, Panghan
1977 “Hankwuk-e Ehui Pikyo Mwunce Cem [Some problems on the comparative study of Korean with the Altaic languages]”. Chosen Gakuhō. 831.1–22.Google Scholar
Kim, Sayeup
1974 Kodai Chōsengo to Nihongo [Old Korean and Japanese]. Tokyo: Kōdansha.Google Scholar
Koppelmann, Heinrich
1933a “Die Verwandtschaft des Koreanischen und der Ainu-Sprache mit den indogermanischen Sprachen”. Anthropos 231.199–234.Google Scholar
1933b Die eurasische Sprachfamilie: Indogermanischf Koreanisch und Verwandtes. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Kreinovich, Evgenij A.
1955 “Gilijatsko-Tunguso-Manchzhurske jazykovie paralleli”. Doklady i soobschenija Instituta jazykoznanija No.81.135–167.Google Scholar
Menges, Karl H.
1964 “Altajisch und Dravidisch”. Orbis 131.66–103.Google Scholar
1984 “Korean and Altaic – A preliminary sketch”. Central Asiatic Journal 283/4.234–295.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew
1984 “Korean and Altaic”. Journal of Korean Studies 51:143–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moellendorff, Paul Georg von
1894 “The Ghilyak Language”. The China Review 211.141–146.Google Scholar
Naert, Pierre
1962 “Contacts lexicaux aïnou-gilyak”. Orbis 111.199–229.Google Scholar
Patrie, James
1982 The Genetic Relationship of the Ainu Language. Hono-lulu: Univ. Press of Haiwaii.Google Scholar
Poppe, Nicholas
1955 Introduction to Mongolian Comparative Studies. (= MSFOu , 1101.) Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.Google Scholar
Refsing, Kirsten
1986 The Ainu Language: The morphology and syntax of the Shizunai dialect. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarthus Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rosny, Léon de
1864 Aperçu de la langue coréenne. Paris: Imprimerie im-périale.Google Scholar
1867 Des affinités du japonais. Paris: Imprimerie Moquet.Google Scholar
Rozycki, William Vincent
1983 Mongol Elements in Manchu. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Uralic and Altaic Studies, Indiana Univ.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. Wilhelm
1926 Die Sprachfamilien und Sprachenkreise der Erde. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Sternberg, Leo
1929 “The Ainu Problem”. Anthropos 241.755–799.Google Scholar
Tsintsius, V. I.
et al. eds. 1975–1977 Spravniîel’ nyj slovar’ tunguso-man-chzhurskix jazykov: Materialy k etymologicheskom slovarju. 21 vols. Leningrad: Izd. “Nauka”.Google Scholar
Whitman, John Bradford
1985 The Phonological Basis for the Comparison of Japanese and Korean. Unpubl. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Lin-guistics, Harvard Univ.Google Scholar
Worth, Dean
1963 “Paleosiberian”. Current Trends in Linguistics ed. by Thomas A. Sebeok, vol. I1: Soviet and East European Linguistics , 345–373. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Krippes, Karl A.
1994. Review of Starostin (1991): Altajskaja problema i proiskhozhdenie japonskogo jazyka. Diachronica 11:2 ► pp. 272 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.