Review published In:
Vol. 6:2 (1989) ► pp.271278
Ard, Josh
1982 “Auxiliary do: Support or emphasis?”. Linguistics 201.445–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John M.
1981 “On Fallen Horses Racing Past Barns”. Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior ed. by Carrie S. Masek et al. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ellegârd, Alvar
1953The Auxiliary Do: The establishment and regulation of its use in English. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. & Bernard Comrie
1977 “Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar”. Linguistic Inquiry 8:1.63–99.Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley
1980Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Black-well.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Matti Rissanen
1986 “So You Support the Do Support? Emphatic and non-emphatic do in affirmative statements in present-day spok-en English”. Papers from the Third Scandinavian Symposium on Syntactic Variation , Stockholm, December 11–12,1985 ed. by Sven Jacobson, 35–50. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Prince, Ellen
1982 “A Comparison of Topicalization and Left-Dislocation in Discourse”. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America held in San Diego, Calif., 27–30 December 1982.
Stein, Dieter
In press. The Semantics of Syntactic Change: Natural, stylistic and varietal factors in the development of do. A case study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.