The Promise of Dialogue

The dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge

Author

Louise Phillips | Roskilde University

Hardbound – Available

ISBN 9789027210296 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00

e-Book –

ISBN 9789027284143 | EUR 90.00 | USD 135.00

It has become commonplace to employ dialogue-based approaches in producing and communicating knowledge in diverse fields. Here, “dialogue” has become a buzzword that promises democratic, participatory processes of mutual learning and knowledge co-production. But what does “dialogue” actually entail in the fields in which it is practised and how can we analyse those practices in ways that take account of their complexities?
The Promise of Dialogue presents a novel theoretical framework for analysing the dialogic turn in the production and communication of knowledge that builds bridges across three research traditions - dialogic communication theory, action research, and science and technology studies.
It also provides an empirically rich account of the dialogic turn through case studies of how dialogue is enacted in the fields of planned communication, public engagement with science and collaborative research. A critical, reflexive approach is taken that interrogates the complexities, tensions and dilemmas inherent in the enactment of “dialogue” and is oriented towards further developing dialogic practices from a position normatively supportive of the dialogic turn.

[Dialogue Studies, 12] 2011. x, 198 pp.

Publishing status: Available

https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.12

Table of Contents

Preface | pp. ix–x

1. Introduction | pp. 1–22

2. Building an integrated theoretical framework across three traditions | pp. 23–58

3. Enacting “dialogue” in planned communication | pp. 59–84

4. Enacting “dialogue” in public engagement with science | pp. 85–116

5. Enacting “dialogue” in collaborative research | pp. 117–144

6. Theorising and analysing dialogic knowledge production and communication: In conclusion | pp. 145–158

7. Further perspectives: Tackling epistemological, methodological and ethical conundrums | pp. 159–184

Index | pp. 195–198

“With this insightful guide to the dialogic turn in communication studies and its application to cases in planned communication campaigns, public engagement with science, and collaborative research, Phillips fulfills the promise of dialogue. Her integration of action research and science and technology studies with dialogic communication theory and research provides a theoretical framework that she applies to collaborative research and organizational, community, and public practices. A must read for every researcher, student and practitioner of dialogue.”

Kenneth N. Cissna, University of South Florida

“Louise Phillips has written an important book in the recent academic discourse on dialogue and dialogical practices. The Promise of Dialogue makes an accessible and stimulating contribution to a reflexive approach to the study of dialogue, covering fundamental theoretical discussions as well as empirical analyses. It deserves to inform many future dialogues.”

Anders Horsbøl, Aalborg University, in MedieKultur: Journal of Media and Communication Research

“Phillips’s book raises compelling and energizing queries for scholars of communication, dialogue, and discourse; it is a must read for those engaged in (or embarking on) research practices under the auspices of the dialogic turn.”

Mariaelena Bartesaghi, University of South Florida, in Discouse & Communication, 2014, 8:111

“Louise Phillips has written an important book in the recent academic discourse on dialogue and dialogical practices. The Promise of Dialogue makes an accessible and stimulating contribution to a reflexive approach to the study of dialogue, covering fundamental theoretical discussions as well as empirical analyses. It deserves to inform many future dialogues.”

Anders Horsbøl, Aalborg University, in MedieKultur, Journal of Media and Communication Research, Vol. 29, No. 55 (2013)

Mariaelena Bartesaghi, University of South Florida, in Discourse and Communication Vol. 8:1 (2014)

Cited by

Cited by 58 other publications

Order by:

Agerbæk, Jonas

2016. Local Folktales on the Radio: Orature and Action Research. In Methodological Reflections on Researching Communication and Social Change [Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change, ], ► pp. 53 ff.

Aggett, Siân

2018. Turning the gaze: challenges of involving biomedical researchers in community engagement with research in Patan, Nepal. Critical Public Health 28:3 ► pp. 306 ff.

Asher, Gordon

2018. Critical dialogues for learning and technology: in, against and beyond the neoliberal university. Open Review of Educational Research 5:1 ► pp. 144 ff.

Bager, Ann Starbæk & Martin Mølholm

2020. A Methodological Framework for Organizational Discourse Activism: an Ethics of Dispositif and Dialogue. Philosophy of Management 19:1 ► pp. 99 ff.

Bartesaghi, Mariaelena & Jessica M.F. Hughes

2023. Introduction. In Disability in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 33], ► pp. 1 ff.

Beck, Susanne, Carsten Bergenholtz, Marcel Bogers, Tiare-Maria Brasseur, Marie Louise Conradsen, Diletta Di Marco, Andreas P. Distel, Leonhard Dobusch, Daniel Dörler, Agnes Effert, Benedikt Fecher, Despoina Filiou, Lars Frederiksen, Thomas Gillier, Christoph Grimpe, Marc Gruber, Carolin Haeussler, Florian Heigl, Karin Hoisl, Katie Hyslop, Olga Kokshagina, Marcel LaFlamme, Cornelia Lawson, Hila Lifshitz-Assaf, Wolfgang Lukas, Markus Nordberg, Maria Theresa Norn, Marion Poetz, Marisa Ponti, Gernot Pruschak, Laia Pujol Priego, Agnieszka Radziwon, Janet Rafner, Gergana Romanova, Alexander Ruser, Henry Sauermann, Sonali K. Shah, Jacob F. Sherson, Julia Suess-Reyes, Christopher L. Tucci, Philipp Tuertscher, Jane Bjørn Vedel, Theresa Velden, Roberto Verganti, Jonathan Wareham, Andrea Wiggins & Sunny Mosangzi Xu

2022. The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach. Industry and Innovation 29:2 ► pp. 136 ff.

Bønnelycke, Julie, Dan Grabowski, Julie Hellesøe Christensen, Peter Bentsen & Astrid Pernille Jespersen

2021. Health, fun and ontonorms: museums promoting health and physical activity. Museum Management and Curatorship 36:3 ► pp. 286 ff.

Carvalho, Anabela, Zara Pinto-Coelho & Eunice Seixas

2019. Listening to the Public – Enacting Power: Citizen Access, Standing and Influence in Public Participation Discourses. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 21:5 ► pp. 563 ff.

Carvalho, Anabela, Margit van Wessel & Pieter Maeseele

2017. Communication Practices and Political Engagement with Climate Change: A Research Agenda. Environmental Communication 11:1 ► pp. 122 ff.

Carvalho, Lucie de

2019. Documenting and Popularising British nuclear power: Exploring science infotainment. InMedia :7.2.

Chhetri, Netra, Rajiv Ghimire, Melissa Wagner & Meng Wang

2020. Global citizen deliberation: Case of world-wide views on climate and energy. Energy Policy 147 ► pp. 111892 ff.

Christensen-Strynø, Maria Bee, Louise Phillips & Lisbeth Frølunde

2023. Disability as dialogue. In Disability in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies, 33], ► pp. 67 ff.

Davis, Lloyd, Birte Fähnrich, Ana Claudia Nepote, Michelle Riedlinger & Brian Trench

2018. Environmental Communication and Science Communication—Conversations, Connections and Collaborations. Environmental Communication 12:4 ► pp. 431 ff.

Egelandsdal, Kjetil

2020. Universitetsforelesningen og responsteknologi. Uniped 43:2 ► pp. 117 ff.

Frølunde, Lisbeth, Christina Hee Pedersen & Martin Novak

2017. Unravelling the Workings of Difference in Collaborative Inquiry. Departures in Critical Qualitative Research 6:1 ► pp. 30 ff.

Gillingham, Philip & Yvonne Smith

2020. Epistemological Siblings: Seven Reasons to Teach Ethnography in Social Work Education. The British Journal of Social Work 50:7 ► pp. 2233 ff.

Gjermestad, Anita, Laila Luteberget, Turid Midjo & Aud Elisabeth Witsø

2020. Preparing a dialogue conference together with persons with intellectual disabilities. Nordic Social Work Research 10:4 ► pp. 343 ff.

Gorostidi-García, Maider, Arantxa Rodríguez-Berrio & Iratxe Aristegui-Fradua

2023. Dissensus as part of dialogue in organizational change processes: a case study in an NGO. IJAR – International Journal of Action Research 19:2 ► pp. 125 ff.

Gremillion, H

2013. Developing a collaborative methodology for research with community groups. Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online 8:1-2 ► pp. 74 ff.

Gronemann, Sigurd Trolle, Erik Kristiansen & Kirsten Drotner

2015. Mediated co-construction of museums and audiences on Facebook. Museum Management and Curatorship 30:3 ► pp. 174 ff.

Gültekin, Bilgehan & Tuba Gültekin

2015. Dialogue Education in Turkey – France Relations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 174 ► pp. 1221 ff.

Halkier, Bente

2017. Mundane science use in a practice theoretical perspective: Different understandings of the relations between citizen-consumers and public communication initiatives build on scientific claims. Public Understanding of Science 26:1 ► pp. 40 ff.

Halås, Catrine Torbjørnsen

2021. The Dialogue Café as a Participatory Method in Research—Potentials and Challenges. In Involving Methods in Youth Research [Studies in Childhood and Youth, ], ► pp. 155 ff.

Harris, Usha S.

2021. Participatory Environmental Communication: Pedagogy and Practice. In Learning from Communicators in Social Change [Communication, Culture and Change in Asia, 7], ► pp. 101 ff.

Horsbøl, Anders

2018. Co-Creating Green Transition: How Municipality Employees Negotiate their Professional Identities as Agents of Citizen Involvement in a Cross-Local Setting. Environmental Communication 12:5 ► pp. 701 ff.

Knapp, Courtney E.

2017. Experimenting with anarchistic approaches to collaborative planning: The Planning Free School of Chattanooga. Journal of Urban Affairs 39:5 ► pp. 635 ff.

Kolbaek, Ditte

2016. Proactive Review - Learn from Experience to Improve Bottom Line. International Journal of Organizational and Collective Intelligence 6:4 ► pp. 1 ff.

Kolbaek, Ditte

2019. Improve Business Results by Learning From Experience in Proactive Reviews. In Strategic Collaborative Innovations in Organizational Systems [Advances in Business Strategy and Competitive Advantage, ], ► pp. 52 ff.

Kumar, Rohit

2020. The Five Strategic Building Blocks of Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). In Mandated Corporate Social Responsibility [CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, ], ► pp. 25 ff.

Lassen, Inger & Anders Horsbøl

2016. Governing citizen engagement. In Studies of Discourse and Governmentality [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 66], ► pp. 73 ff.

Lauge Andersen, Lisbeth

2024. A narrative journey into the borderland of patient safety: Toward an expanded, relational concept of safety. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 7:3

Lischinsky, Alon & Annika Egan Sjölander

2014. Talking Green in the Public Sphere: Press Releases, Corporate Voices and the Environment. Nordicom Review 35:s1 ► pp. 125 ff.

Nordentoft, Helle Merete & Birgitte Ravn Olesen

2023. Should I intervene or not? Reflexive learning in Forum Theatre: a peer dialogue on a facilitator’s dilemma. Teaching in Higher Education 28:6 ► pp. 1412 ff.

Ntini, Eric & Hugh Mangeya

2020. A Dialogic Analysis of Audiences’ Interactions on Online Media Sites in Zimbabwe. Communicatio 46:2 ► pp. 64 ff.

Olesen, Birgitte Ravn

2021. Should I Have Said “No”? Critical Reflections on Tensions in Forum Theater. International Review of Qualitative Research 14:3 ► pp. 483 ff.

Olesen, Birgitte Ravn & Helle Merete Nordentoft

2018. “On slippery ground” – beyond the innocence of collaborative knowledge production. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 13:4 ► pp. 356 ff.

Oliveira, Liliana & Anabela Carvalho

2023. How climate scientists and communication professionals view public engagement with science: Perspectives, practices and constraints. Frontiers in Communication 8

Palaiologou, Ioanna

2017. The use of vignettes in participatory research with young children. International Journal of Early Years Education 25:3 ► pp. 308 ff.

Parder, Mari-Liisa

2020. Possibilities for Co-Creation in Adolescents’ Alcohol Prevention. Journal of Creative Communications 15:2 ► pp. 147 ff.

Phillips, Louise, Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø & Lisbeth Frølunde

2022. Thinking with autoethnography in collaborative research: A critical, reflexive approach to relational ethics. Qualitative Research 22:5 ► pp. 761 ff.

Phillips, Louise, Lisbeth Frølunde & Maria Bee Christensen-Strynø

2021. Confronting the Complexities of “Co-Production” in Participatory Health Research: A Critical, Reflexive Approach to Power Dynamics in a Collaborative Project on Parkinson’s Dance. Qualitative Health Research 31:7 ► pp. 1290 ff.

Phillips, Louise, Anders Larsen & Lotte Mengel

2022. What “Coproduction” in Participatory Research Means From Participants’ Perspectives: A Collaborative Autoethnographic Inquiry. Journal of Participatory Research Methods 3:2

Phillips, Louise & Ksenija Napan

2016. What's in the 'co'? Tending the tensions in co-creative inquiry in social work education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 29:6 ► pp. 827 ff.

Phillips, Louise & Michael Scheffmann-Petersen

2020. Minding the Gap Between the Policy and Practice of Patient-Centeredness: Cocreating a Model for Tensional Dialogue in the “Active Patient Support” Program. Qualitative Health Research 30:9 ► pp. 1419 ff.

Phillips, Louise & Michael Scheffmann‐Petersen

2020. Unpacking ‘patient‐centredness’: how knowledge is negotiated dialogically in the interweaving of genres and voices in counselling conversations. Sociology of Health & Illness 42:6 ► pp. 1456 ff.

Sekulić, Bojana

2024. Institutional education for dialogue and tolerance in Serbia. Srpska politička misao 83:1 ► pp. 179 ff.

Soggiu, Anna-Sabina Lindroos, Trude Gøril Klevan, Larry Davidson & Bengt Eirik Karlsson

2020. School`s out with fever: service provider perspectives of youth with mental health struggles. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 25:1 ► pp. 343 ff.

Soggiu, Anna‐Sabina, Bengt Eirik Karlsson, Trude Gøril Klevan & Ottar Ness

2021. Inner and Outer Voices in Research: How Dialogical Approaches Can Enhance Knowledge Development in Mental Healthcare. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy 42:2 ► pp. 225 ff.

Son, Daisuke, Hirono Ishikawa, Yuki Yonekura & Kazuhiro Nakayama

2023. The process of Transformative Learning in Dialog Café with Health Professionals and Citizens/Patients. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health 14 ► pp. 215013192311643 ff.

Starbæk Bager, Ann, Kenneth Mølbjerg Jørgensen & Pirkko Raudaskoski

2016. Dialogue and governmentality-in-action. In Studies of Discourse and Governmentality [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 66], ► pp. 209 ff.

Stelter, Reinhard

2014. The Origins and Development of Coaching. In A Guide to Third Generation Coaching, ► pp. 13 ff.

Tomlinson, Peter & Clara De Ruysscher

2020. From monologue to dialogue in mental health care research: reflections on a collaborative research process. Disability & Society 35:8 ► pp. 1274 ff.

Uhre, Jannie

2018. The dialogic construction of patient involvement in patient-centred neurorehabilitation. Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare 2:3

van Burgsteden, Lotte, Hedwig te Molder & Geoffrey Raymond

2022. Going against the interactional tide: The accomplishment of dialogic moments from a conversation analytic perspective. Discourse Studies 24:4 ► pp. 471 ff.

Vasilyeva, Alena L.

2024. Review of Lewiński & Aakhus (2023): Argumentation in Complex Communication: Managing Disagreement in a Polylogue. Language and Dialogue 14:1 ► pp. 163 ff.

Verk, Nataša, Urša Golob & Klement Podnar

2021. A Dynamic Review of the Emergence of Corporate Social Responsibility Communication. Journal of Business Ethics 168:3 ► pp. 491 ff.

Yu, Sherry S.

2018. Multi-ethnic public sphere andaccessible ethnic media: mapping online English-language ethnic media. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44:11 ► pp. 1976 ff.

[no author supplied]

2016. Arguing for a General Framework for Social Media Scholarship. In Strategic Social Media, ► pp. 312 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Subjects