Cover not available
Part of
Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres
Edited by Luz Gil-Salom and Carmen Soler-Monreal
[Dialogue Studies 23] 2014
► pp. 137–164

Chapter 5. Dialogic voices of writers and readers in traveller forums through interpersonality

 | IULMA (Instituto Interuniversitario de Lenguas Modernas Aplicadas), Universitat de Valencia
This study explores web-based discourse genres and applies a dialogic framework to the study of interpersonality in traveller forums. This genre belongs to the domain of travel and tourism, where the interaction of writers-readers leads towards its ultimate purpose: to persuade others through positive or negative opinions. The theory of Dialogic Action Games (Weigand 2008, 2009, 2010) aids to understand its rationale since these dialogic interactions can be seen as an application of Weigand’s principles (2010), in this case materialized through interpersonal markers (Vande Kopple 1985; Crismore et al. 1993). A corpus of traveller forums (180 threads of conversation) from Trip Advisor was compiled and analyzed. The quantitative and qualitative analyses draw on the notion of voice (White 2003; Hyland 2008), divided into writer’s stance and reader’s engagement. This research shows that they are encoded in a number of interpersonal markers which participate in the genre’s rhetorical characterization.
Published online: 10 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.23.07sua
References (49)
Bakhtin, Mijail. 1986. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bing, Pan, MacLaurin, Tanya, and Crotts, John C. 2007. “Travel blogs and the implications for destination marketing”. Journal of Travel Research 46 (1): 35–45. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruns, Axel. 2008. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishings.Google Scholar
Calvi, Mª Vittoria. 2010. “Los géneros discursivos en la lengua del turismo: una propuesta de clasificación”. Ibérica 19 (Spring): 19–32.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L., and Nichols, Joanna (eds). 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon, Markkanen, Raija, and Steffensen, Margret. 1993. “Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students”. Written Communication 10 (1): 39–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crismore, Avon, and Vande Kopple, William J. 1997. “Hedges and readers: effects on attitudes and learning”. In Hedging and Discourse: Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon in Academic Texts, Raika Markkanen and Hartmut Schroeder (eds), 83–114. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.Google Scholar
Crismore, Avon, and Abdollehzadeh, Esmaeel. 2010. “A review of recent metadiscourse studies: the Iranian context”. Nordic Journal of English Studies 9 (2): 195–219.Google Scholar
Crotts, John. 1999. “Consumer decision-making and prepurchase information search”. In Consumer Behavior in Travel and Tourism, Yoel Mansfield and Abraham Pizam (eds), 149–168. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
Crowston, Kevin, and Williams, Mary. 2000. “ Reproduced and Emergent Genres of Communication on the World-Wide Web ”. Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, January 1997, Wailea, HI.<[URL]>
Crystal, David. 2006. Language and the Internet, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge ­University Press.Google Scholar
Dafouz Milne, Emma. 2008. “The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: a cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse”. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 95–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DuBois, Jack. 2007. “The stance triangle”. In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, Robert Englebretson (ed). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Edo Marzá, Nuria. 2012. “Páginas web privadas e institucionales: el uso de la adjetivación en un corpus inglés-español de promoción de destinos turísticos”. In Discurso turístico e Internet, Julia Sanmartín Sáez (ed.), 51–80. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
Erickson, Thomas. 1999. “Rhyme and Punishment: The Creation and Enforcement of Conventions in an On-line Participatory Genre”. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences . Hawai. CD-ROM issued by IEEE Press.
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti. 2005. “The self and the others – polyphonic visibility in research articles”. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 29–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grewal, Rajdeep, Cline, Thomas W. and McKenna, Alex G. 2003. “Early-Entrant Advantage, Word-of-Mouth Communication, Brand Similarity, and the Consumer Decision-Making Process”. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (3): 187–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herring, Susan (ed.). 1996. Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 1994. “Evaluation and organisation in a sample of written academic discourse”. In Advances in Written Text Analysis, Michael Coulthard (ed), 191–218. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan and Thompson, Geoff (eds). 2000. Evaluation in Text. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hyland, Kenneth. 1998. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. ­London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 2001. “Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles”. English for Specific Purposes 20: 207–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Kenneth, and Tse, Polly. 2004. “Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal”. Applied Linguistics 25/2: 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Kenneth. 2005. Metadiscourse. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
. 2008. “Disciplinary voices. Interactions in research writing”. English Text Construction 1:1: 5–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koskensalo, Annikki. 2012. “Towards a better professional understanding of the hybrid genre ‘tourism websites’”. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the Asia Pacific Language for Special Purposes and Professional Communication Association . University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Mapelli, Giovanna. 2008. “Las marcas de metadiscurso interpersonal de la sección ‘turismo’ de los sitios web de los ayuntamientos”. In Lingue, culture, economia: comunicazione e pratiche discorsive, Mª Vittoria Calvi, Giovanna Mapelli and Javier Santos (eds), 173–190. Milano: Franco Angeli.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Robert W. 1972. Tourism principles, Practices and Philosophies. Columbus, U.S.A.: Grid.Google Scholar
Pierini, Patrizia. 2009. “Adjectives in Tourism English on the Web. A corpus-based study”. CÍRCULO de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación (clac) 40/2009: 93–116. Madrid: ­Universidad Complutense de Madrid.Google Scholar
Rheingold, Howard. 2000. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sanmartín-Sáez, Julia. 2007. El chat: la conversación tecnológica. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Santini, Marina. 2007. “Characterizing Genres of Web Pages: Genres Hybridism and Individualization”. Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS’07), 1–10.
Shepherd, Michael, Watters, Charles, and Kennedy, Alistair. 2004. “Cybergenre: Automatic Identification of Home Pages on the Web”. Journal of Web Engineering 3, 3 and 4: 236–251.Google Scholar
Suau Jiménez, Francisca. 2012. “Páginas web institucionales de promoción turística: el usometadiscursivo interpersonal en inglés y español”. In Discurso turístico e Internet, Julia Sanmartín Sáez (ed.), 125–154. Madrid: Iberoamericana/Vervuert.Google Scholar
. 2011. “La persuasión a través del metadiscurso interpersonal en el género Página Web Institucional de Promoción Turística en inglés y español”. In La Lengua del turismo: géneros discursivos y terminología, Mª Vittoria Calvi and Giovanna Mapelli (eds), 177–200. Bern: Peter Lang, Linguistic Insights.Google Scholar
Suau Jiménez, Francisca, and Dolón Herrero, Rosana. 2007. “The Importance of Metadiscourse in the genre ‘Promotion of Touristic Services and Products’: Differences in English and Spanish”. In Languages for Specific Purposes: Searching for Common Solutions, Dita Galová (ed.), 71–79. Newcastle, U.K.: Cambridge Scholars Publishings.Google Scholar
Thompson, Geoff, and Ye, Yjun. 1991. “Evaluation of the reporting verbs used in academic papers”. Applied Linguistics 12: 365–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, Charles. 2001. “Language and the Internet”. In The concise encyclopedia of sociolinguistics, Mesthrie Rejend and Raymond Asher (eds). London: Pergamon.Google Scholar
TIA. 2005. “Executive Summaries – Travellers’Use of the Internet, 2004 Edition”. Retrieved November 15, 2005, from [URL]
Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. “Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse”. College Composition and Communication 36: 82–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Varga, Cristina. 2011. Knowledge Transmission in Cyberspace. Ph.D. Dissertation. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. [URL]Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2009. “Rhetoric in the Mixed Game”. In Dialogue and Rhetoric, Edda Weigand (ed), 3–22. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Language as Dialogue, Sebastian Feller (ed). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. 
 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R. 2003. “Beyond modality and hedging: a dialogic view of the language of intersubjective stance”. Text 23 (2): 2594–2598.Google Scholar
World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), and European Travel Commission (ETC), Handbook of E-Marketing for Tourism Destination. WTO and ETC, Spain, 2008.
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Biri, Ylva
2024. Personal conviction against general knowledge. In Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 342], ► pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Lam, Phoenix W. Y.
2021. Analysing the functions of online destination forums through a corpus-assisted discourse-analytic approach. Pragmatics and Society 12:2 ► pp. 243 ff. DOI logo
Suau-Jiménez, Francisca
2019. Engagement of readers/customers in the discourse of e-tourism promotional genres. In Engagement in Professional Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 301], ► pp. 341 ff. DOI logo
Martin-Monje, Elena & Beatriz Sedano
2018. Through the Eyes of the Tourist. In Innovative Perspectives on Tourism Discourse [Advances in Hospitality, Tourism, and the Services Industry, ], ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Pano Alamán, Ana
2018. Opinión y atenuación en los comentarios de la prensa digital española. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 73 ► pp. 103 ff. DOI logo
Dolón, Rosana
2014. The Traveller Forum: An Advice-seeking Site Contributing to the Construction of Parental Social Actors and to On-line Parental Bond Creations. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4:10 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.