Cover not available
Part of
Educating in Dialog: Constructing meaning and building knowledge with dialogic technology
Edited by Sebastian Feller and Ilker Yengin
[Dialogue Studies 24] 2014
► pp. 51–74

The why dimension, dialogic inquiry, and technology supported learning

This chapter introduces a number of theoretical perspectives in presenting an analysis of why the why dimension of inquiry – asking, learning, understanding, knowing, and explaining why – presents challenges and opportunities for the design and implementation of technology supported learning environments. Central to this theoretical discussion are epistemological constructs such as ‘becoming to know’ (Jakubik 2011) and ‘sense-making’ (Dervin 1998; Weick 1995; Snowden 2002). Supporting this theoretical discussion is a number of sense-making models representing relationships between learning and knowledge and the characteristics of why-questioning. Reasoning, reflection, and dialogue are all identified as embedded within dialogic inquiry and these activities provide the context for consideration of how the why dimension in technology supported learning environments may be supported.
Published online: 14 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.24.03mas
References (84)
Ackoff, Russell. 1989. “From Data to Wisdom.” Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 16: 3–9.Google Scholar
Ackoff, Russell L., Herbert J. Addison, and Andrew Carey. 2010. Systems Thinking for Curious Managers: With 40 New Management F-Laws. Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press Limited.Google Scholar
Adler, Mortimer J. 1986. A Guidebook to Learning: for a Lifelong Pursuit of Wisdom. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Anderson, Lorin, and David Krathwohl (eds). 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bahktin, Mikhail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination – Four Essays. ed. by Michael Holquist, Trans. by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Benkler, Yochai. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets. New Haven, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Berge, Zane L., and Lin A. Muilenburg (eds). 2013. Handbook of Mobile Learning. United Kingdom: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloom, Benjamin (ed.). 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives – Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. Reproduced 1984. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Bruck, Peter A., and Madanmohan Rao (eds). 2013. Global Mobile: Applications and Innovations for the Worldwide Mobile Ecosystem. Medford, NJ: Information Technology Today, Inc.Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1966. Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Acts of Meaning. The Jerusalem-Harvard Lectures. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Leo, and Bertram C. Bruce. 2011. “The Practice Profile of Inquiry: Connecting Digital Literacy and Pedagogy.” E-Learning and Digital Media 8 (1): 76–85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cleveland, Harlan. 1982. “Information as a Resource.” The Futurist 16 (6): 34–39.Google Scholar
Dash, Nirod. 1993. “Research Paradigms in Education: Towards a Resolution”. Journal of Indian Education 19 (2): 1–6.Google Scholar
Dervin, Brenda. 1999. “On studying Information Seeking Methodologically: the Implications of Connecting Metatheory to Method”. Information Processing & Management 35 (6): 727–750. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1998. “Sense-Making Theory and Practice: An Overview of User Interests in Knowledge Seeking and Use”. Journal of Knowledge Management 2 (2): 36–46. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewey, John. 1966. Democracy and Education: an Introduction to the Philosophy of Education (originally published 1916). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Evered, Roger. 2005. “A Typology of Explicative Models.” In Foundations for Inquiry: Choices and Tradeoffs in the Organizational Sciences, ed. by Craig Lundberg, and Cheri Young, 198–202. Stanford, CA: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Frické, Martin. 2009. “The Knowledge Pyramid: A Critique of the DIKW Hierarchy.” Journal of Information Science 35 (2): 131–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasser, Les. 1991. “Social Conceptions of Knowledge and Action: DAI Foundations and Open Systems Semantics.” Artificial Intelligence 47 (1–3): 107–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gholson, Barry, Amy Witherspoon, Brent Morgan, Joshua K. Brittingham, Robert Coles, Arthur C. Graesser, Jeremiah Sullins, and Scotty D. Craig. 2012. “Exploring the Deep-Level Reasoning Questions Effect during Vicarious Learning among Eighth to Eleventh Graders in the Domains of Computer Literacy and Newtonian Physics.” Instructional Science 37 (5): 487–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur C. 2011. “Learning, Thinking, and Emoting with Discourse Technologies.” American Psychologist 66 (8): 746–757. Accessed June 24, 2013. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Graesser, Arthur, Yasuhiro Ozuru, and Jeremiah Sullins. 2010. “What is a Good Question?” In Bringing Reading Research to Life, ed. by Margaret McKeown, and Linda Kucan, 125–126. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Griffin, Patrick, Barry McGaw, and Esther Care. (Eds.). 2012. Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. London: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Thomas R. 1993. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification.” Knowledge Acquisition 5 (2): 199–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, William K.C. 1989. “Socrates”. In The Oxford Companion to the Mind, ed. by Richard Gregory, 723. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1993. “Towards a Language-Based Theory of Learning”. Linguistics and Education 5: 93–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hart, Graeme, and Jon Mason. 1999. “Computer-Facilitated Communications in Transition”. In Virtual Instruction – Issues and Insights from an International Perspective, ed. by Carine Feynten, and Joyce Nutta, 147–171. Colorado: Libraries Unlimited, Inc.Google Scholar
Hey, Jonathan. 2004. The Data, Information, Knowledge, Wisdom Chain: The Metaphorical link. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (UNESCO).Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan. 2007. “Semantic Prosody Revisited.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (2): 249–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jakubik, Maria. 2011. “Becoming to Know. Shifting the Knowledge Creation Paradigm”. Journal of Knowledge Management 15 (3): 374–402. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Larry, Alan Levine, Rachel Smith, and S. Stone. 2010. The 2010 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
Kelly, Brian, Scott Wilson, and Randy Metcalfe. 2007. “Openness in Higher Education: Open Source, Open Standards, Open Access.” Proceedings ELPUB2007 Conference on Electronic Publishing , 161–174. Accessed June 2013. [URL].
Kelly, Patricia. 2008. Towards Globo Sapiens: Transforming Learners in Higher Education. Educational Futures: Rethinking Theory and Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
Krathwohl, David R. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview”. Theory into Practice 41 (4): 212–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuhlthau, Carol C. 2009. “Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century.” Proceedings, 38th Annual Conference incorporating the 13th International Forum on Research in School Librarianship . Abano Terme (Padua), Italy: International Association of School Librarianship.
. 2004. Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services. London: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
Kuhlthau, Carol C., Leslie Maniotes, and Ann Caspari. 2007. Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
Kunze, John. 2001. “A Metadata Kernel for Electronic Permanence.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications DC-2001, 177–184. Tokyo, Japan: National Institute of Informatics.Google Scholar
Leeson, Jerry, and Jon Mason. 2007. “The Open Agenda and Organisational Alignment.” Supplementary Proceedings, the 15th International Conference on Computers in Education 1: 189–194. Accessed June 2013. [URL].Google Scholar
Lipscomb, Lindsay, Janet Swanson, and Anne West. 2004. “Scaffolding”. In Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology. The Global Text Project, ed. by Michael Orey, 226–238. Zurich, Switzerland: Jacobs Foundation. Accessed June 2013. [URL].Google Scholar
Lyle, Sue. 2008. “Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice”. Language and Education 22 (3): 222–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mandinach, Ellen B., and Sharnell S. Jackson. 2012. Transforming Teaching and Learning through Data-Driven Decision Making – Classroom Insights from Educational Psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mason, Jon. 2012. “Scaffolding Reflective Inquiry – Enabling Why-Questioning while e-Learning.” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning 7 (3): 175–198.Google Scholar
. 2009. “Knowledge Management and Dublin Core.” Proceedings , International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications , Seoul, Korea, 41–50.
. 2008. “A Model for Sense-Making: Exploring Why in the Context of Learning and Knowing”. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE2008) , 545–549. Taipei, Taiwan: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Mason, Jon, Don Norris, and Paul Lefrere. 2003. “An Expeditionary Approach to E-Knowledge.” Proceedings of EduCause in Australasia . Adelaide, 137–143.
Nelson, Tamara, and David Slavit. 2007. “Collaborative Inquiry among Science and Mathematics Teachers in the USA: Professional Learning Experiences through Cross‐Grade, Cross‐Discipline Dialogue”. Journal of In-Service Education 33 (1): 23–39. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nonaka, Ikujiro, and Hirotaka Takeuchi. 2011. “The Big Idea: The Wise Leader”. Harvard Business Review 89 (5): 58–67.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Patton, Michael Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd edn. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Paul, Richard, and Linda Elder. 2007. “Critical Thinking: The Art of Socratic Questioning, Part I”. Journal of Developmental Education. 31 (1): 36–37.Google Scholar
Paul, Richard. 1990. Critical Thinking: What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World. Rohnert Park, CA: Center for Critical Thinking and Moral Critique.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1967. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Rambe, Patient. 2012. “Constructive Disruptions for Effective Collaborative Learning: Navigating the Affordances of Social Media for Meaningful Engagement”. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 10 (1): 132–146.Google Scholar
Ravenscroft, Andrew. 2011. “Dialogue and Connectivism: A New Approach to Understanding and Promoting Dialogue-Rich Networked Learning.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 (3). Accessed June 2013. [URL].Google Scholar
. 2007. “Promoting Thinking and Conceptual Change with Digital Dialogue Games.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (6): 453–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Renshaw, Peter D. 2010. “Dialogic Learning Teaching and Instruction”. In Dialogic Learning: Shifting Perspectives to Learning, Instruction, and Teaching, ed. by Jos van den Linden, and Peter Renshaw, 1–15. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Dan, and Luz Santana. 2011. Make Just One Change: Teach Students to Ask Their Own Questions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
Rowley, Jennifer. 2007. “The Wisdom Hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW Hierarchy.” Journal of Information Science 33 (2): 163–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Nikhil. 2010. Sensemaking Handoffs: Why? How? and When? Doctoral Thesis, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Sinclair, John M. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Snowden, Dave. 2002. “Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self-Awareness”. Journal of Knowledge Management 6 (20): 100–111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stumpf, Samuel E. 1983. Philosophy: History and Problems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Teo, Yiong Hwee. 2003. Assessing Critical Thinking Through Scaffolded Asynchronous Online Discussion. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.Google Scholar
Tokuhama-Espinosa, Tracey. 2011. Mind, Brain, and Education Science: A Comprehensive Guide to the New Brain. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Tomioka, S. 2009. “Why Questions, Presuppositions, and Intervention Effects”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 18 (4): 253–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Bill. 2012. “The Flipped Classroom: Online instruction at home frees class time for learning.” Education Next 12 (1). Accessed June 2013. [URL]
Urquhart, Vicki, and Monette McIver. 2005. Teaching Writing in the Content Areas. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Publications.Google Scholar
Verberne, Suzanne. 2010. In Search of the Why: Developing a System for Answering Why-Questions. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Radboud Universiteit.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, Lev S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Warwick, Paul, Sara Hennessy, and Neil Mercer. 2011. “Promoting Teacher and School Development through Co‐Enquiry: Developing Interactive Whiteboard Use in a ‘Dialogic Classroom’.” Teachers and Teaching 17 (3): 303–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wegerif, Rupert. 2008. “Dialogic or Dialectic? The Significance of Ontological Assumptions in Research on Educational Dialogue”. British Educational Research Journal 34 (3): 347–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. “Dialogic Inquiry in Education: Building on the Legacy of Vygotsky”. In Vygotskian Perspectives on Literacy Research, ed. by Carol Lee, and Peter Smagorinsky, 51–85. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weed, Laura. 2003. The Structure of Thinking – A Process-Oriented Account of Mind. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Wells, Gordon. 1999. Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations – Foundations for Organizational Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda. 2010. Dialogue: The Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicki, Andrzej, and Yoshiteru Nakamori. 2006. Creative Space, Models of Creative Processes for the Knowledge Civilization Age (Studies in Computational Intelligence 10). The Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, Andrew. 2013. “Shades of Freire: Exorcising the Spectre Haunting Pedagogy.” Journal of Pedagogy 4 (1): 5–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Roy, Regina Karousou, and Jenny Mackness. 2011. “Emergent Learning and Learning Ecologies in Web 2.0.” The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 (3). Accessed June 24, 2013. [URL].Google Scholar
Wood, David, Jerome Bruner, and Gail Ross. 1976. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving”. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry 17 (2): 89–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeleny, Milan. 1987. “Management Support Systems: Towards Integrated Knowledge Management.” Human Systems Management 7 (1): 59–70.Google Scholar