Article published in:
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 115–136

Epistemic stance

Knowing, Unknowing, Believing (KUB) positions

| University of Macerata, Italy
| University of Macerata, Italy
| University of Macerata, Italy
| University of Macerata, Italy
In this study, we compare three approaches to epistemic stance: Akio Kamio’s Theory of Territories of Information (intended as a bridge between evidentiality and politeness) and his distinction between direct and indirect forms of utterances; John Heritage’s differentiation between epistemic status and epistemic stance and between speakers’ more knowledgeable and less knowledgeable positions; our theoretical model, which includes three epistemic positions : knowing, unknowing, believing (not knowing whether). Similarities and differences among these three approaches and their applicability to the analysis of naturally occurring conversations are discussed.
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.06zuc
References
Bongelli, Ramona, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2008 Indicatori Linguistici Percettivi e Cognitivi. Roma: Aracne.Google Scholar
Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2013 “Certain-Uncertain, True-False, Good-Evil in Italian Political Speeches.” In Multimodal Communication in Political Speech. Shaping Minds and Social and Social Action, ed. by Isabella Poggi, Francesca 
D’Errico, Laura Vincze, and Alessandro Vinciarelli, 164–180. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Emphatic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012a “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012b “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012c “Beyond and Behind the Words: Some Reactions to My Commentators.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 76–81. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68 (1): 15–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kamio, Akio
1994 “The Theory of Territory of Information. The Case of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 21 (1): 67–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995 “Territory of Information in English and Japanese and Psychological Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics 24 (3): 235–264. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997a Territory of Information. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997b “Evidentiality and Some Discourse Characteristics in Japanese.” In Directions in Functional Linguistics, ed. by Akio Kamio, 145–171. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawanishi, Yumiko
1994 “On the ‘Theory of Territory of Information’. An Interview with Akio Kamio.” Issue in Applied Linguistics 5 (2): 437–448.Google Scholar
Keevallik, Leelo
2011 “The Terms of Not Knowing.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 184–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2011 “The Management of Knowledge Discrepancies and of Epistemic Changes in Institutional Interactions.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 27–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies 15 (5): 597–626. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petöfi, János Sándor
1973 “Towards an Empirically Motivated Grammar Theory of Verbal Texts.” In Studies in Text Grammar, ed. by János Sándor Petöfi, and Hannes Rieser, 205–275. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Scrittura e Interpretazione. Introduzione alla Testologia Semiotica dei Testi Verbali. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar
Philip, Gill, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni, Carla Canestrari, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2013 “Negotiating Narrative. Dialogic Dynamics of Known, Unknown and Believed in Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.” Language and Dialogue 3 (1): 6–32. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Riccioni, Ilaria, Ramona Bongelli, and Andrzej Zuczkowski
2013 “The Communication of Certainty and Uncertainty in Italian Political Media Discourses.” In The Pragmatics of Political Discourse, ed. by Anita Fetzer, 125–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. . “Mitigation and Epistemic Positions in Troubles Talk: The Giving Advice Activity in Close Interpersonal Relationships. Some Examples from Italian.” Language & Communication 39: 51–72.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
2007 Sequence Organization in Interactions: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013 “Ten Operations in Self-Initiated, Same-Turn Repair.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hayashi, Geoffrey Raymond, and Jack Sidnell, 41–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977 “The Preference for Self-Correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53 (2): 361–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
2011 “Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trent, Nobuko
2013 “Speaker’s Information Territory and EFL Politeness Strategy of Japanese Learners of English.” In JALT 2012 Conference Proceedings, ed. by N. Sonda, and A. Krause. Tokyo: JALT.Google Scholar
Zuczkowski, Andrzej, Ramona Bongelli, and Ilaria Riccioni
2011 “Proposizione costitutiva di mondo e indicatori linguistici percettivi e cognitivi.” In Dimensionen der Analyse von Texten und Diskursen. Festschrift für János Sándor Petöfi zum achtzigsten Geburstag. Dimensioni dell’analisi di testi e discorsi. Festschrift für János Sándor Petöfi in occasione del suo ottantesimo compleanno, ed. by Klaus Hölker, and Carla Marello, 41–61. Berlin: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Bongelli, Ramona, Ilaria Riccioni & Andrzej Zuczkowski
2015. Consigli per dare consigli: salvaguardare il benessere relazionale nelle interazioni informali d'aiuto. RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA :1 ► pp. 193 ff. Crossref logo
Dorigato, Laura, Gill Philip, Ramona Bongelli & Andrzej Zuczkowski
2015. Knowing, Unknowing, Believing stances and characters’ dialogic identities in the Harry Potter books. Language and Dialogue 5:1 ► pp. 62 ff. Crossref logo
Szczyrbak, Magdalena
2019. EPISTEMIC STANCE IN THE KAVANAUGH CONFIRMATION HEARING: FOCUS ON MENTAL AND COMMUNICATION VERBS. Discourse and Interaction 12:2 ► pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Vincze, Laura, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni & Andrzej Zuczkowski
2016. Ignorance-unmasking questions in the Royal–Sarkozy presidential debate: A resource to claim epistemic authority. Discourse Studies 18:4 ► pp. 430 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 july 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.