Article published in:
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 201–221

Epistemic struggles in addiction Therapeutic Community meetings

| University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
In this study I analyse Therapeutic Community (TC) group meetings for persons with drug addiction problems. Using the method of Conversation Analysis, I specifically focus on practices of knowledge management and sharing between the educators and clients of a TC in Italy. As part of their institutional remit, the educators encourage the clients to report information on their activities and to disclose aspects of their inner experience. This can lead to epistemic struggles, in which the clients resist providing information and the educators seek to overcome such resistance by making claims of pre-existing knowledge about the clients’ experience. After describing the design and sequential positioning of such claims, I argue that their use is functional to manage one of the dilemmas that characterise the educators’ professional practice.
Published online: 26 November 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.25.10pin
References

References

Drew, Paul
1998 “Complaints about Transgressions and Misconduct.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 31: 295–325. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt
1988 “Complainable Matters: The Use of Idiomatic Expressions in Making Complaints.” Social Problems 35: 398–417. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2012 “What Drives Sequences?” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45: 61–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-state Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Territories of Knowledge, Territories of Experience: Empathic Moments in Interaction.” In The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakib Steensig, 159–183. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012 “The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45: 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2012 “Navigating Epistemic Landscapes: Acquiescence, Agency and Resistance in Responses to Polar Questions.” In Questions: Formal, Functional and Interactional Perspectives, ed. by Jan P. de Ruiter, 179–192. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koshik, Irene
2010 “Questions That Convey Information in Teacher-Student Conferences.” In “Why Do You Ask?” The Function of Questions in Institutional Discourse, ed. by Alice F. Freed, and Susan Erlich, 159–186. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macpherson, R., T.R. Edwards, R. Chilvers, C. David, and H.J. Elliott
2009 “Twenty-four Hour Care for Schizophrenia (Review).” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2: CD004026. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandelbaum, Jenny
1991/1992. “Conversational Non Cooperation: An Exploration of Disattended Complaints.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 25: 97–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, and David Silverman
1991 “Owning Experience: Describing the Experience of Other Persons.” Text 11: 441–480.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1980 “Telling My Side: “Limited Access” as a “Fishing” Device.” Sociological Inquiry 3-4: 186–198. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Jeffrey D., and Galina B. Bolden
2010 “Preference Organization of Sequence-initiating Actions: The Case of Explicit Account Solicitations.” Discourse Studies 12: 501–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1987 “On the Preference for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button, and John R.E. Lee, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
2000 “Overlapping Talk and the Organization of Turn-Making for Conversation.” Language in Society 29: 1–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shah, Deepa, and Sarah Paget
2006 Service Standards for Addiction Therapeutic Communities (1st ed.). London: The Royal College Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2010 Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori
2010 “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 43: 85–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar