Part of
Communicating Certainty and Uncertainty in Medical, Supportive and Scientific Contexts
Edited by Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ramona Bongelli, Ilaria Riccioni and Carla Canestrari
[Dialogue Studies 25] 2014
► pp. 249271
References
Aakhus, Mark
2007“Communication as Design.” Communication Monographs 74 (1): 112–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles
2002“Personalized Revision of ‘Failed’ Questions.” Discourse Studies 4 (4): 411–428.Google Scholar
2006“Producing a ‘Cognition’.” Discourse Studies 8 (1): 9–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, Maxwell J., and John Heritage
1984“Preference Organization.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John 
Heritage, 53–56. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D
1978Methods of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bolden, Galina B
2009“Beyond Answering: Repeat-Prefaced Responses in Conversation.” Communication Monographs 76 (2): 121–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Elisabeth, and John Heritage
2006“Taking the Patient’s Medical History: Questioning during Comprehensive History Taking.” In Communication in Medical Care: Interactions Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients, ed. by John Heritage, and Douglas W. 
Maynard, 151–184. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brenner, Michael
1981“Aspects of Conversational Structure in the Research Interview.” In Conversation and Discourse: Structure and Interpretation, ed. by Paul Werth, 19–40. 
London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1982“Response Effects of the ‘Role-restricted’ Characteristics of the Interviewer.” In Response Behaviour in the Survey Interview, ed. by Wil Dijkstra, and Johannes Van der Zouwen, 131–165. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985“Survey Interviewing.” In The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches, ed. by Michael Brenner, Jennifer Brown, and David Cantor, 9–36. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles
1986Learning How to Ask. A Sociolinguistic Appraisal of the Role of Interview in Social Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caron, André, Jennie M. Hwang, Boris H.J.M. Brummans, and Letizia Caronia
2013“Business Writing on the Go: How Executives Manage Impressions Through E-mail Communication in Everyday Work Life.” Corporate Communication: An International Journal 18 (1): 8–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Caronia, Letizia
1997Costruire la conoscenza. Interazione e interpretazione nella ricerca sul campo in educazione [Constructing knowledge. Interaction and interpretation in educational field research]. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven, E
1993“Reformulating the Question: A Device for Answering/Not Answering Questions in News Interviews and Press Conferences.” Text 13: 59–188.Google Scholar
Cooren, François
De Caro, Mario, and Maurizio Ferraris
2012Bentornata realtà: il nuovo realismo in discussione [Wellcome back reality: discussing new realism]. Einaudi: Torino.Google Scholar
Dore, John, and Robert McDermot
1982“Linguistic Indeterminacy and Social Context in Utterance Interpretation.” Language 58: 374–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul
2003“Comparative Analysis of Talk-in-interaction in Different Institutional Settings: A Sketch.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Philip Glenn, Curtis D. Lebaron, and Jennifer Mandelbaum, 293–307. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
(eds) 1992Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DuBois, John W
2007“The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fiske, Don W., and Richard A. Shweder
(eds) 1986Metatheory in Social Science: Pluralisms and Subjectivities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold
1967Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, and Harvey Sacks
1970“On Formal Structures of Practical Action.” In Theoretical Sociology: Perspectives and Development, ed. by John C. McKinney, and Edward A. Tiryakian, 338–366. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gergen, Kenneth, and Mary H. Gergen
1991“From Theory to Reflexivity in Research Practice.” In Method and Reflexivity: Knowing as Systemic Social Construction, ed. by Frederic Steier, 76–95. London, United Kingdom: Sage.Google Scholar
Glenn, Philip
2011“Formulation Sequences in Mediation: The Storytelling Stage.” Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference, Boston, May 2011.
Heritage, John
1985“Analyzing News Interviews: Aspects of the Production of Talk for an Overhearing Audience.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Vol.3: Discourse and Dialogue, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 95–117. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1998“Oh-prefaced Responses to Inquiry.” Language in Society 27: 291–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003“Designing Questions and Setting Agendas in the News Interview.” In Studies in Language and Social Interaction: In Honor of Robert Hopper, ed. by Philip Glenn, Curtis D. Lebaron, and Jennifer Mandelbaum, 57–90. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
2011“A Galilean Moment in Social Theory? Language, Culture and their Emergent Properties.” Qualitative Sociology 34: 263–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005“The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John, and Rodney D. Watson
1979“Formulations as Conversational Objects.” In Everyday Language; Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 123–162. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Houtkoop-Steenstra, Hanneke
2000Interaction and the Standardized Survey Interview: The Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Herbert H., William J. Cobb, Jacob J. Feldman, Clyde W. Hart, and Charles H. Stember
1954/1975Interviewing in Social Research 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, Clara
2012“Recordability: Resistance and Collusion in Psychometric Interviews with Children.” Discourse Studies 14 (6): 691–709. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kvale, Steinar, and Svend Brinkmann
2009InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno
1999Pandora’s Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael
1993Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action: Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, Johannes van der Zouwen, and Nora Cate Schaeffer
(eds.) 2002Standardization and Tacit Knowledge: Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora Cate Schaeffer
2002“Standardization and Interaction in the Survey Interview. Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Method, ed. by Jaber F. Gubrium, and James A. Holstein, 577–602. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W., and Nora C. Schaeffer
2006“Standardization-in-interaction: The Survey Interview.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, 
Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 9–27. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Mishler, Elliot
1986Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moerman, Michael
1988Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia, Penn.: University of Pennsylvania Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1984“Pursuing a Response.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversational Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 152–163. Cambridge, MA.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1988“Offering a Candidate Answer.” Communication Monographs, 55: 360–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Alexa Hepburn
2005“Qualitative Interviews in Psychology: Problems and Possibilities.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 2 (4): 281–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012“Eight Challenges for Interview Researchers.” In Handbook of Interview Research (2nd ed.), ed. byJaber F. Gubrium, and James A. Holstein, 555–570. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan, and Margaret Wetherell
1987Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul, and William M. Sullivan
(eds.) 1987Interpretive Social Science. A Second Look. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey
2003“Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Type Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding.” American Sociological Review 68: 939–967. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006“Questions at Work: Yes/No Type Interrogatives in Institutional Contexts.” In Talk and Interaction in Social Research Methods, ed. by Paul Drew, Geoffrey Raymond, and Darin Weinberg, 115–134. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey
1984“Notes on Methodology.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson, and John Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: 
Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
1974“A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Nora C., and Douglas W. Maynard
2005“From Paradigm to Prototype and Back Again: Interactive Aspects of “Cognitive Processing” in Standardized Survey Interviews.” In Conversation and Cognition, ed. by Hedwig te Molder, and Jonathan Potter, 114–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel
1968“The Routine as Achievement.” Human Studies 9: 111–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1972“Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.” In Studies in Social Interaction, ed. by David Sudnow, 75–119. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
1987“Between Micro and Macro: Context and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey Alexander, Bernard Giessen, Richard Munch, and Neil Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2007Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, Gail Jefferson, and Harvey Sacks
1977“The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation.” Language 53: 361–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel, and Gene H. Lerner
2009“Beginning to Respond: Well-prefaced Responses to Wh-questions.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 42 (2): 91–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack
2010Conversation Analysis. An Introduction. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Singer, Eleanor, Martin R. Frankel, and Marc B. Glassman
1983“The Effect of the Interviewer Characteristics and Expectations on Response.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43: 68–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steier, Frederic
(ed.) 1991Research and Reflexivity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Jeffrey D. Robinson
2006“A Preference for Progressivity in Interaction.” Language in Society 35: 367–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy, Karen, and Jessica Robles
2009“Questions, Questioning, and Institutional Practices: An Introduction.” Discourse Studies 11 (2): 131–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weatherall, Ann
2011I Don’t Know as a Prepositioned Epistemic Hedge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 44 (4): 317–337. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Wermuth, Maria-Cornelia
2016. Language localization in scientific drug information. The Journal of Internationalization and Localization 3:1  pp. 74 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 7 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.