Article published in:
Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. vii–xiv

Introduction

Persuasive action games or the power of words in dialogic interaction

| Transilvania University of Brasov (Romania)
Published online: 01 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.001int
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Pelclová, Jana & Wei-lun Lu
2018.  In Persuasion in Public Discourse [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 79], ► pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 march 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Anderson, Rob, and Kenneth N. Cissna
1996 “Criticism and Conversational Texts: Rhetorical Bases of Role, Audience, and Style in the Buber-Rogers Dialogue.” Human Studies 19: 85–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, ed. by Caryl Emerson, and Michael Holquist, transl. by V.W. McGee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, Karl
1934/1990 Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cattani, Adelino
2008 “Logical and Rhetorical Rules of Debate.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 119–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth N., and Rob Anderson
2008 “Dialogic Rhetoric, Coauthorship, and Moments of Meeting.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 39–54. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooren, François
2008 “The Selection of Agency as a Rhetorical Device: Opening up the Scene of Dialogue Through Ventriloquism.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 23–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst
1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Isabela, and Norman Fairclough
2012 Political Discourse Analysis. A Method for Advanced Students. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1963 Essais de linguistique générale. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Neagu, Maria-Ionela
2013 Decoding Political Discourse. Conceptual Metaphors and Argumentation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ong, Walter J.
1967 The Presence of the Word: Some Prolegomena for Cultural and Religious History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Popper, Karl
1934/1959 The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London/ New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rovenţa-Frumuşani, Daniela
2000 Argumentarea. Modele şi strategii. Bucureşti: All.Google Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2003 Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. 2nd rev. ed. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 “Argumentation: The Mixed Game.” Argumentation 20 (1): 59–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar