Part of
Persuasive Games in Political and Professional DialogueEdited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. 143–160
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. 143–160
Argumentation at work
The paper analyses argumentation in two different professional contexts – the former, a joint company, which brings together Romanian and Belgian employees, and the latter, a Romanian company. The paper is structured in three parts – a theoretical presentation of argumentation, defined as a type of interaction whose aim is to solve differences of opinions between interlocutors, the data analysis part, and the conclusions. It reconstructs the argument, identifies its type, function and forms, and draws conclusions in terms of different argumentation strategies used in the two companies.
References (16)
Anscrombe, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot
1983 L’argumentation dans la Langue. Bruxelles: Pierre Mardaga.
Beamer, Linda, and Iris Varner
2008 Intercultural Communication in the Global Workplace. (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Bermejo-Luque, Lilian
2011 “Giving Reasons. A Contribution to Argumentation Theory.” Theoria 26 (3): 273–277.
Cummings, Louise
2005 Pragmatics A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Robert Grootendorst
1983 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
1995 “Argumentum ad Hominum – A Pragma-Dialectical Case in Point.” In Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, ed. by Hans V. Hansen, and Robert C. Pinto, 223–228. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.
Gheorghe, Mihaela, Stanca Măda, and Răzvan Săftoiu
2009a Comunicarea la locul de muncă. Corpus de interacţiune verbală în mediul profesional. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.
2009b Comunicarea la locul de muncă. Schiţă de tipologie a textelor redactate în mediul profesional românesc. Braşov: Editura Universităţii Transilvania din Braşov.
Grimshaw, Allen D
2009 “Research on Conflict Talk: Antecedents, Resources, Findings, Directions.” In Conflict Talk – Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversations, ed. by Allen D. Grimshaw, 280–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huţiu, Otilia
2010 “Conversational Strategies in Management Unions Negotiations.” Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series IV: Philology and Cultural Studies 3 (52): 192–210.
Missimer, Connie
2005 Good Arguments – An Introduction to Critical Thinking. (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.
O’Keefe, Daniel F
1992 “Two Concepts of Argument.” In Readings in Argumentation, ed. by William Benoit, Dale Hample, and Pamela J. Benoit, 79–90. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 
Rovenţa-Frumuşani, Daniela
2000 Argumentarea. Modele şi strategii. Bucureşti: Bic All.
Simons, Herbert W., Joanne Morreale, and Bruce Gronbeck
2001 Persuasion in Society. Thousand Oaks California: Sage Publications.
Toulmin, Stephen
2003 The Uses of Argument. Revised edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Werder, Axel V
1999 “Argumentation Rationality of Management Decisions.” Organization Science 10 (5): 672–690.