Article published in:
Persuasive Games in Political and Professional Dialogue
Edited by Răzvan Săftoiu, Maria-Ionela Neagu and Stanca Măda
[Dialogue Studies 26] 2015
► pp. 249–274

Persuading through narratives

A multimodal analysis of the Council of Europe photo exhibition “Break the silence on domestic violence”

| University of Naples Federico II (Italy)
Following the tradition of Critical Discourse Analysis and Social Semiotics, this paper seeks to identify the linguistic and visual tools of persuasion in the Council of Europe photo exhibition “Break the silence on domestic violence” by looking at the way in which they interact to produce a persuasive message. In particular, the investigation focuses on narratives, which are one of the most powerful persuasive strategies available. They can combine different modalities and many voices in a single event and can have different functions: informative, self-presentational, entertaining, or, as in this case, persuasive. In this campaign material narratives evoke images and help European citizens to feel strong emotions associated with the stories represented. The text analysis helps to reveal that verbal and pictorial narratives are employed as a persuasive instrument to raise awareness on human rights by facilitating identification with the victims of abuses.
Published online: 01 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.26.12zol
References

References

Abbott, Porter H.
2002 The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
1986 Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1999 “The Problem of Speech Genres.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 236–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland
1977 Image, Music, Text (essays selected and translated by Stephen Heath). London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Robert, and Charles L. Briggs
1990 “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 59–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Allan
1999 “News Stories as Narratives.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 236–251. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K.
2004 Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Billig, Michael
1985 “Prejudice, Categorization and Particularization: From a Perceptual to a Rhetorical Approach.” European Journal of Social Psychology 15: 79–103. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1987 Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1991 Ideology and Opinions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan
2005 Discourse. A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borchers, Timothy. A.
2005 Persuasion in the Media Age. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie
2006 Spectatorship of suffering. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, Lilie, and Norman Fairclough
1999 Discourse in Late Modernity. Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Clapham, Andrew
2007 Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, Teun A. van
2001 “Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 95–120. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, Rob Grootendorst, Francisca Snoeck Henkemans, J. Anthony Blair, Ralph H. Johnson, Erik C.W. Krabbe, Christian Plantin, Douglas N. Walton, Charles A. Willard, John Woods, and David Zarefsky
1996 Fundamentals of Argumentation Theory: A Handbook of Historical Backgrounds and Contemporary Developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman
1992 Discourse and Social Change. London: Polity.Google Scholar
1993 “Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities.” Discourse and Society 4 (2): 133–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Language and Globalization. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2011 “Discursive Hybridity and Social Change in Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Genre(s) on the Move: Hybridization and Discourse Change in Specialized Communication. ed. by Srikant Sarangi, Vanda Polese, and Giuditta Caliendo, 11–26. Napoli: ESI.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, and Ruth Wodak
1997 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse as Social Interaction. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, Vol. 2, ed. by Teun A. van Dijk, 103–136. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman, Jane Mulderrig, and Ruth Wodak
2011 “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Discourse Studies. A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. by Teun. A. van Dijk, 357–378. London: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress
1988 Social Semiotics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Iedema, Rick
2003 “Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multi-semiotic Practice.” Visual Communication 2 (1): 29–57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Nicholas Coupland
1999 “Introduction: Perspectives on Discourse Analysis.” In The Discourse Reader, ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 158–166. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kitis, Eliza
1997 “Ads – Part of our Lives: Linguistic Awareness of Powerful Advertising.” Word and Image 13 (1): 304–313. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kress, Gunther, and Theo van Leeuwen
1996 Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
2001 Multimodal Discourse. The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Labov, William
2006 “The Transformation of Experience in Narrative.” In The Discourse Reader (2nd ed.), ed. by Adam Jaworski, and Nicholas Coupland, 214–226. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky
1997 “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Journal of Narrative and Life History. Special Issue 7 (1-4): 3–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van
2002 “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Critical Discourse Analysis. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, ed. by Michael J. Toolan, 302–339. London; New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Leeuwen, Theo van, and Ruth Wodak
1999 “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1 (1): 83–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per
1998 “Discourse across Boundaries: On Recontextualisations and the Blending of Voices in Professional Discourse.” Text 18 (2): 143–157.Google Scholar
Machin, David
2007 Introduction to Multimodal Analysis. London: Hodder Arnold.Google Scholar
Nelson, Jameer., Allan Megill, and David McClosky
(eds) 1987 The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Paisley, William. J.
2001 “Public Communication Campaigns. The American Experience.” In Public Communication Campaigns (3rd ed.), ed. by Ronald E. Rice, and Charles K. Atkin, 3–22. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Perloff, Richard M.
2003 The Dynamics of Persuasion: Communication and Attitudes in the 21st Century (2nd ed.). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Simons, Herbert W.
(ed) 1989 Rhetoric in the Human Science. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Symon, Gilles
2000 “Everyday Rhetoric: Argument and Persuasion in Everyday Life.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 9 (4): 477–488. CrossrefGoogle Scholar