Dialogue and character in 21st century TV drama
The case of ‘Sherlock Holmes’
The successful British-made TV drama series Sherlock (BBC 2011-present) is one of the latest in a long sequence of dramatisations of the Victorian short stories and novels by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. This chapter discusses some passages of dialogue from the first episode of this series, demonstrating how the character is created and maintained, focusing in particular on Sherlock’s antisocial tendencies, his eccentricity and his remarkable deductive powers. The analysis further seeks to isolate the distinctive contribution of dialogue in this respect from other aspects of audiovisual production, drawing as appropriate on the sociolinguistics of stance, politeness theory and conversational analysis.
References (15)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2012. Language and Society in Cinematic Discourse. Special issue of Multilingua – Journal of Cross-Cultural and Interlanguage Communication 31: (2/3).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bednarek, Monika. 2012. The Language of Fictional Television: Drama and Identity. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burton, Deirdre. 1980. Dialogue and Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Modern Drama Dialogue and Naturally Occurring Conversation. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2001. Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. Paul,. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, III: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41-58. New York: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herman, Vimala. 1998. Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kozloff, Sarah. 2000. Overhearing Film Dialogue. University of California Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McIntyre, Dan. 2008. “Integrating Multimodal Analysis and the Stylistics of Drama: A Multimodal Perspective on Ian McKellen’s Richard III.” Language and Literature, 17 (4): 309-334. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Richardson, Kay. 2010. Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language 50: 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Short, Mick. 2002. “From Dramatic Text to Dramatic Performance.” In Exploring the Language of Drama: From Text to Context, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Mick Short, and Peter Verdonk, 6-18. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Gibbons, Alison & Sara Whiteley
2021.
Do worlds have (fourth) walls? A Text World Theory approach to direct address inFleabag.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 30:2
► pp. 105 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.