Cover not available
Part of
Dialogue across Media
Edited by Jarmila Mildorf and Bronwen Thomas
[Dialogue Studies 28] 2017
► pp. 77–92

All talk

Dialogue and intimacy in Spike Jonze’s Her

This chapter focuses on the ways in which film dialogue can enact and foreground the complex mechanisms underlying conversational interaction, and demonstrate the ways in which verbal interaction may be as much about concealment and solipsism as it is about intimacy and revelation. With close reference to Spike Jonze’s Her, which centres on the developing relationship between a lonely writer and an operating system designed to fulfill his every need, the chapter will examine how the film’s foregrounding of character dialogue to the exclusion of almost everything else challenges convention and relies on the audience to read between the lines of the characters’ utterances. The chapter draws on theories of dialogue from literary criticism, narratology and linguistics as well as film studies to argue that dialogue in film is not just about exquisitely staged scenes or displays of auteurish experimentation, but plays an integral role in the audience’s active engagement with the characters and their investment in their unfolding relationships.

Published online: 19 January 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.28.05tho
References
Batty, Craig
2012 Screenplays: How to Write and Sell Them. Harpenden: Kamera Books.Google Scholar
Brody, Richard
2013 “Ain’t Got No Body.” The New Yorker. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Brown, William
2015 “The Digital Female Body: ScarJo as Inhuman.” Paper presented at Screen conference , Glasgow, UK. Available at [URL] [Abstract Accessed July 28 2015].
Buchanan, Kyle
2014 “The Toughest Song I Ever Wrote: Spike Jonze on Her’s Sweet Song.” Vulture. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Burton, Deirdre
1980 Dialogue and Discourse: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Modern Drama Dialogue and Naturally Occurring Conversation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and J.Wade French
1981 “Telephone Goodbyes.” Language in Society 10: 1-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eighan, Erin E
2015 “Sin City, Hybrid Media, and a Cognitive Narratology of Multimedia.” In Critical Approaches to the Films of Richard Rodriguez, ed. by Frederick L. Aldama. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Eggertsen, Chris
2013 “Her Q&A. Hitfix.” Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].
Herman, David
2006 “Dialogue in a Discourse Context: Scenes of Talk in Fictional Narrative.” Narrative Inquiry 16 (1): 79-88.Google Scholar
Herman, Vimala
1995 Dramatic Discourse: Dialogue as Interaction in Plays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jaeckle, Jeff
2013 “Introduction: A Brief Primer for Film Dialogue Study.” In Film Dialogue, ed. by Jeff Jaeckle, 1-16. New York: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Andrew
1983 Dramatic Dialogue: The Duologue of Personal Encounter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jonze, Spike
2011 Her. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 29 2015].Google Scholar
Kozloff, Sarah
2000 Overhearing Film Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2013 “Preface.” In Film Dialogue, ed. by Jeff Jaeckle, xii-xv. New York: Wallflower Press.Google Scholar
Lodge, David
1990 After Bakhtin: Essays on Fiction and Criticism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moran, Charles, and Gail E. Hawisher
1998 “The Rhetorics and Languages of Electronic Mail.” In Page to Screen: Taking Literacy into the Electronic Era, ed. by Ilana Snyder, 80-101. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Palmer, Alan
2004 Fictional Minds. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Nathan, Ian
2014 “Her: the very odd couple.” Empire. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 15].Google Scholar
Penny, Laurie
2016 “Why Do We Give Robots Female Names? Because We Don’t Want to Consider Their Feelings.” New Statesman. Available at [URL] [Accessed May 20 2016].Google Scholar
Piazza, Roberta, Monika Bednarek, and Fabio Rossi
(eds) 2011 Telecinematic Discourse: Approaches to the Language of Films and Television Series. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kay
2010 Television Dramatic Dialogue: A Sociolinguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, Juliana
2014 “Could it be Her Voice? Why Scarlett Johansson’s Voice Makes Samantha Seem Human.” thepsychreport. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 15].Google Scholar
Spaeth, Ryu
2014 “Spike Jonze’s Her is actually a terrible movie.” The Week. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Thomas, Bronwen
1997 “It’s Good to Talk? An Analysis of a Telephone Conversation from Evelyn Waugh’s Vile Bodies .” Language and Literature 6 (2): 105-19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Fictional Dialogue: Speech and Conversation in the Modern and Postmodern Novel. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
ThyCriticMan
2014 Under the Skin (2014) Review. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Tse, Carmen
2013 “Spike Jonze’s Dystopic Vision of Los Angeles in ‘Her’.” Laist. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Turkle, Sherry
2011 Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
VanHemert, Kyle
2014 “Why Her Will Dominate UI Design Even More Than Minority Report.” Wired. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar
Young, Kay
2001 Ordinary Pleasures: Couples, Conversation, and Comedy. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Zeitchik, Steven
2013 “NYFF 2013: With voice-centric ‘Her’, Spike Jonze makes a statement.” Los Angeles Times. Available at [URL] [Accessed July 28 2015].Google Scholar