Cover not available
Part of
Dialogic Ethics
Edited by Ronald C. Arnett and François Cooren
[Dialogue Studies 30] 2018
► pp. 77–125

The ethics of intercultural dialogue

Reconciliation discourse in John Paul II’s pontifical correspondence

This chapter focuses on the discourse of peace-building and reconciliation in John Paul II’s correspondence to marginalized groups and communities worldwide. The letters, addressed to war victims, refugees and prisoners, aimed to draw public attention to ongoing problems of injustice, violence and imbalance in different life domains. It will be shown, with the help of the Transformative Approach to Conflict, how the actors in John Paul II’s dialogic endeavours perform their self-/other-transformation via qualitative remodellings of their social and personal identities. By decomposing agonistic discourse practices, the interactants run dialogic strategies of respect to, solidarity and involvement with the discriminated parties. The lived human reciprocity, complementarity and uniqueness that is thereby construed generates the real ‘ethical spirit’ of linguistic communication.
Keywords: dialogue, reconciliation, participation, integration, subjectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Intercultural dialogue as a discursive way of coming to terms with the ‘difficult past’
  • 3.Research perspective and scope
  • 4.The discourse of JPII’s reconciliation letters
    • 4.1The discourse of empowerment in JPII’s reconciliation letters: E dimension
    • 4.2The discourse of empowerment in JPII’s reconciliation letters: C dimension
    • 4.3The discourse of empowerment in JPII’s reconciliation letters: R dimension
    • 4.4The discourse of recognition in JPII’s reconciliation letters: The integration of the E-C-R dimensions of the human world
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 14 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.30.04oku
References (96)
References
Abrantes, Ana Margarida. 2005. “Euphemism and co-operation in discourse”, in: Eric Grillo (ed.) Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. 85–103. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Accattoli, Luigi. 1997. Quando il Papa chiede perdono. Tutti i mea culpa di Giovanni Paolo II. Milano: Arnoldo Mondadori Editore SpA.Google Scholar
Anthonissen, Christine. 2003. “Challenging media censoring. Writing between the lines in the face of stringent restrictions”, in: James R. Martin and Ruth Wodak (eds.) Re/reading the Past. Critical and Functional Perspectives on Time and Value. 91–112. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1972. Crises of the Republic. San Diego/New York/London: A Harvest Book/Hartcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Responsibility and Judgment. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Arnett, Ronald C. 1986. Communication and Community. Implications of Martin Buber’s Dialogue. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Arnett, Ronald C. and Pat Arneson. 1999. Dialogic Civility in a Cynical Age. Community, Hope, and Interpersonal Relationships. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Borowik, Bogdan. 2014. “Źródła i formy dialogu Jana Pawła II z judaizmem i islamem w świetle komentarzy publicystów Tygodnika Powszechnego” [Sources and forms of John Paul II’s dialogue with Judaism and Islam in the light of journalists’ comments from Tygodnik Powszechny ], in: Arkadiusz Dudziak and Agnieszka Żejmo (eds.) Jan Paweł II w komunikowaniu międzykulturowym. O sztuce dialogu z innym. [John Paul II in cross-cultural communication. On the Art of Dialogue with Another]. 295–323. Olsztyn: Vertum.Google Scholar
Borromeo, Agostino (ed.). 2003. L’inquisizione. Atti del Simposio internazionale. Città del Vaticano: Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana.Google Scholar
Buber, Martin. 1937. I and Thou. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Bush, Robert A. Baruch and Joseph P. Folger. 2005. The Promise of Mediation. The Transformative Approach to Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Casaroli, Agostino. 1987. “Stolica Apostolska i pokój” [The Holy See and peace], in: Katarzyna Cywińska, Tadeusz Konopka and Marian Radwan (eds.) Paweł VI, Jan Paweł II. Orędzia papieskie na Światowy Dzień Pokoju [Paul VI, John Paul II. Papal Messages on the International Peace Day]. 9–27. Lublin: KUL.Google Scholar
Chlebowski, Tomasz Jan. 2014. „Dialog z islamem jako wyzwanie komunikacji międzyreligijnej Jana Pawła II” [Dialogue with Islam as John Paul II’s challenge for cross-religious communication], in: Arkadiusz Dudziak and Agnieszka Żejmo (eds.) Jan Paweł II w komunikowaniu międzykulturowym. O sztuce dialogu z innym. [John Paul II in cross-cultural communication. On the Art of Dialogue with Another]. 84–103. Olsztyn: Vertum.Google Scholar
Chrostowski, Waldemar (ed.) 2005. Żydzi i judaizm w nauczaniu Jana Pawła II 1978–2005. [Jews and Judaism in John Paul II’ teaching]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Archidiecezji Warszawskiej.Google Scholar
Chrostowski, Waldemar and Ryszard Rubinkiewicz (eds.) 1990. Żydzi i judaizm w dokumentach Kościoła i nauczaniu Jana Pawła II (1965–1989). [Jews and Judaism in the Church Documents and John Paul II’ teaching]. Warsaw: ATK.Google Scholar
Cloke, Kenneth. 2001. Mediating Dangerously. The Frontiers of Conflict Resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dudziak, Arkadiusz and Agnieszka Żejmo (eds.) Jan Paweł II w komunikowaniu międzykulturowym. O sztuce dialogu z innym. [John Paul II in cross-cultural communication. On the Art of Dialogue with Another]. Olsztyn: Vertum.
Duffy, Maria. 2009. Paul Ricoeur’s Pedagogy of Pardon. A Narrative Theory of Memory and Forgetting. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Ensink, Titus and Christoph Sauer. 2003. “Facing the past. The commemoration of the Warsaw Uprising on the occasion of its fiftieth anniversary”, in: Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer (eds.) The Art of Commemoration: Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising. 1–18. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(eds.) 2003. The Art of Commemoration: Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse. Textual Analysis for Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feder Kittay, Eva. 2014. “The completion of care – with implications for a duty to receive care graciously”, in: Ana Marta González and Craig Iffland (eds.) Care Professions and Globalization. Theoretical and Practical Perspectives. 33–42. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Freedman, E. 2007. “Protecting sacred sites on public land.” American Indian Quarterly 31: 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawkowska, Aneta. 2015. Skandal i ekstaza. Nowy feminizm na tle koncepcji pojednania według Jana Pawła II [Scandal and Extasy. New Feminizm against the Background of John Paul II’s Idea of Reconciliation]. Warsaw: Warsaw University Press.Google Scholar
Gmurzyńska, Ewa. 2009. “Rodzaje mediacji” [“Types of mediation”], in: Ewa Gmurzyńska and Rafał Morek (eds.) Mediacje. Teoria i praktyka [Mediations. Theory and Practice]. 109–125. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gold, Lois. 1993. “Influencing unconscious influences: The healing dimension of mediation”, Mediation Quarterly 11/1: 55–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Góra-Szopiński, Dariusz. 2009. “Ład międzynarodowy według Jana Pawła II” [International order according to John Paul II], in: Czesław Kustra (ed.) Wdzięczność i zobowiązanie. [Gratefulness and Commitment]. 83–92. Toruń: UMK Press.Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria and Joanna Pawelczyk. 2014. “The interactional accomplishment of feelings-talk in psychotherapy and executive coaching: Same format, different functions?”, in: Eva-Maria Graff, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogassy (eds.) 2014. Discourses of Helping Professions. 59–89. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greatbatch, David and Robert Dingwall. 1999. “Professional neutralism in family mediation”, in: Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds.) Talk, Work and Institutional Order. Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. 271–292. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Eric. 2005a. “Foreword”, in: Eric Grillo (ed.) Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. vii–xvii. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005b. “Two dogmas of discourse analysis”, in: Eric Grillo (ed.) Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. 3–41. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005c. “Conclusion”, in: Eric Grillo (ed.) Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. 223–237. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (ed.). 2005. Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Heer, Hannes. 2008. “‘That is what is so terrible – that millions of soldiers were there, yet today they all claim that never saw a thing’: War and the Nazi period, as recalled by visitors to the Wehrmacht exhibition in Vienna, 1995”, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 70–96. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heer, Hannes et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ingarden, Roman. 2009. Książeczka o człowieku [A Book on Man]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Google Scholar
Kampf, Zohar. 2013. “Mediated performatives”, in: Jef Verschueren et al. (eds.) Handbook of Pragmatics Online. Volume 17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard (ed.) Paul Ricoeur. The Hermeneutics of Action. London: Sage.DOI logo
Kłoczowski, Jan Andrzej. 2005. Filozofia dialogu. [Philosophy of Dialogue]. Poznań: W. drodze.Google Scholar
Kohn, Jerome. 2003. “Introduction”, in: Hannah Arendt Responsibility and Judgment. vii–xxix. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
Kovach, Kimberlee K. 2004. Mediation. Principles and Practice. St. Paul, MN: West.Google Scholar
Kulska, Joanna. 2014. “Jan Paweł II wobec ‘zderzenia cywilizacji’. Rola dialogu międzyreligijnego i międzykulturowego w procesie konstruowania postzimnowojennego ładu międzynarodowego” [John Paul II on ‘civilization crossing’. The role of interreligious and intercultural dialogue in the process of constructing post-Cold War international order], in: Arkadiusz Dudziak and Agnieszka Żejmo (eds.) Jan Paweł II w komunikowaniu międzykulturowym. O sztuce dialogu z innym. [John Paul II in cross-cultural communication. On the Art of Dialogue with Another]. 145–165. Olsztyn: Vertum.Google Scholar
LaFever, Marcella. 2008. “Communication for public decision-making in a negative historical context: Building intercultural relationships in the British Columbia treaty process”, Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 1/2: 158–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. “Empowering Native Americans: Communication, planning, and dialogue for eco-tourism in Gallup, New Mexico”, Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 4/2: 127–145. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loitfellner, Sabine. 2008. “‘The appalling toll in Austrian lives…’: The Wehrmacht and its soldiers in Austrian school books”, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 155–174. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Manoschek, Walter. 2008a. “The crimes of the Wehrmacht in the Second World War”, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 17–26. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2008b. “The holocaust as recounted in Wehrmacht soldiers’ letters from the front”, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 27–49. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2008c. “The attitudes and beliefs of Austrian soldiers in the German Wehrmacht 1938–1945”, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 50–69. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2002. “Blessed are the peacemakers: Reconciliation and evaluation.” Christopher N. Candlin (ed.) Research and Practice in Professional Discourse. 187–227. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press.Google Scholar
2003. “Voicing the ‘other’: Reading and writing Indigenous Australians”, in: Gilbert Weiss and Ruth Wodak (eds.) Critical Discourse Analysis. Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
2004a. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and change”, Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 49: 179–200.Google Scholar
2004b. “Negotiating difference: Ideology and reconciliation. M. Pütz, J. N. van Aertselaer and T. A. van Dijk (eds.) Communicating Ideologies: Language, Discourse and Social Practice. 85–177. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and Maree Stenglin. 2006. “Materializing reconciliation: Negotiating difference in a transcolonial exhibition”, in: T. Royce and W. Bowcher (eds.) New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. 215–238. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. 2008: “Intermodal reconciliation: Mates in arms”, in: Len Unsworth (ed.) New Literacies and the English Curriculum: Multimodal Perspectives. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Martin, James R. and P. R. R. White. 2005. The Language of Evaluation. Appraisal in English. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mejos, Edward A. 2007. “Against alienation: Karol Wojtyła’s Theory of Participation”, Kritikē 1/1: 71–85.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miszewska, Anna. 2009. “Świadkowie przeszłości, inspiratorzy mądrości – Jan Paweł II o jesieni życia” [Wittnesses of the past, inspirers of wisdom – John Paul II on the autumn of life], in: Czesław Kustra (ed.) Wdzięczność i zobowiązanie. [Gratefulness and Commitment]. 225–231. Toruń: UMK Press.Google Scholar
Muntigl, Peter. 2004. Narrative Counselling. Social and Linguistic Processes of Change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muntigl, Peter, Naomi Knight and Ashley Watkins. 2014. “Empathic practices in client-centred psychotherapies: Displaying understanding and affiliation with clients”, in Discourses of Helping Professions, ed. by Eva-Maria Graff, Marlene Sator and Thomas Spranz-Fogassy, 33–57. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Okulska, Urszula. 2011. “Discursive construction of the JPII Generation in letters of Polish children and teenagers to Pope John Paul II”, in Language, Culture and the Dynamics of Age, ed. by Anna Duszak and Urszula Okulska, 139–190. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
. 2016. “Science and ethics in the knowledge society: A rhetorical perspective”, in Rhetoric, Discourse and Knowledge, ed. by Maria Załęska and Urszula Okulska, 71–99. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
. (forthcoming). Dialogue as Linguistic Peace-Building. Foundations of the Integrative Theory of Discourse. Frankfurt am Mein: Peter Lang.
Olechnowicz, Joanna. 2010. “Wpływ dyplomacji watykańskiej na pokojowe rozwiązanie konfliktu o Kanał Beagle między Argentyną a Chile” [The influence of the Vatican Diplomacy on the resolution of conflict over the Beagle Channel between Argentina and Chile], in: Robert Łoś and Jacek Reginii-Zacharski (eds.) Konflikty i spory międzynarodowe. [International Conflicts and Disputes]. 255–267. Łódź: WUŁ.Google Scholar
Pawelczyk, Joanna. 2011. Talk as Therapy. Psychotherapy in a Linguistic Perspective. Boston/Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pollak, Alexander. 2008a. “The myth of the ‘untained Wehrmacht’: The structural elements of Wehrmacht’s mythology in the Austrian press since 1945”, in The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation, ed. by Hannes Heer et al., 132–154. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 2008b. “All that remains of the Second World War: Stalingrad and Wehrmacht mythology in television documentaries”, in The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation, ed. by Hannes Heer et al., 175–204. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rahder, B. L. 1999. “Victims no longer: Planning with a diversity of women at risk of abuse”, Journal of Planning Education and Research 18: 221–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1992a. Oneself as Another. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 1992b. Filozofia Osoby [Philosophy of Person]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PAT.Google Scholar
. 1996. “Reflections on a new ethos for Europe”, in Paul Ricoeur. The Hermeneutics of Action, ed. by Richard Kearney, 3–13. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Carl R. 1961. On Becoming a Person: A Therapist’s View of Psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
Rycielski, Piotr and Piotr O. Żylicz. 1997. „O roli facylitatora w rozwiązywaniu sporów w małych grupach” [On the role of a facilitator in conflict resolution in small groups”], in Konflikt i porozumienie. Psychologiczne podstawy demokracji deliberatywnej [Conflict and Settlement. Psychological Foundations of Deliberative Democracy], ed. by Janusz Reykowski, 77–92. Warszawa: Academica.Google Scholar
Savinitch, Lioudmila. 2005. “Pragmatic goals and communicative strategies in journalistic discourse under censorship”, in Power without Domination. Dialogism and the Empowering Property of Communication, ed. by Eric Grillo, 107–137. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, Michele M. (ed.) 2003. Femmes dans le Christ. Vers un nouveau féminisme. Toulouse: Éditions du Carmel.Google Scholar
Sharaby, Rachel. 2013. “Bridge between absorbing and absorber: Ethiopian mediators in the Isreali Public Service”, International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 5/1: 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sandner, Günther and Walter Manoschek. 2008. „Defining the victims of nazism“, in: Hannes Heer et al. (eds.) 2008. The Discursive Construction of History. Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation. 99–131. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sowiński, Sławomir and Zenderowski Radosław. 2003. Europa drogą Kościoła. Jan Paweł II o Europie i europejskości [Europe as the Church’s Way. John Paul II on Europe and Europeanness]. Wrocław: Ossolineum.Google Scholar
Steinke, Klaus. 2003. “Pope John Paul II as a Polish patriot. The Pope’s letter in commemoration of the Warsaw Uprising”, in The Art of Commemoration: Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer, 212–221. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tanner, Deborah. 1998. The Argument Culture. Moving from Debate to Dialogue. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Tischner, Józef. 1990. Filozofia dramatu. [Philosophy of Drama]. Paris: Éditions du Dialogue.Google Scholar
. 2005. Etyka solidarności [Ethics of Solidarity]. Kraków: Znak.Google Scholar
Tomaszewska, Magdalena. 2009. “Jan Paweł II i młodzi na Światowych Dniach Młodzieży, które trwają bez końca…” [John Paul II on the World Youth Day, which lasts forever…], in Wdzięczność i zobowiązanie. [Gratefulness and Commitment], ed. by Czesław Kustra, 257–266. Toruń: UMK Press.Google Scholar
Uhl, Heidemarie. 2008. “Interpreting the ‘War of Annihilation’”, in The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation, ed. by Hannes Heer et al., 251–266. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Umbreit, Mark. 1997. “Humanistic mediation: A transformative journey of peacemaking”, Mediation Quarterly 14/3: 201–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Mediating Interpersonal Conflicts. A Pathway to Peace. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock Publishers.Google Scholar
van Vree, Frank. 2003. “The politics of public memory. The commemoration of the Second World War in a historical and comparative perspective”, in The Art of Commemoration: Fifty Years after the Warsaw Uprising, ed. by Titus Ensink and Christoph Sauer, 223–241. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verdoolaege, Annelis. 2008. Reconciliation Discourse. The Case of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waszkiewicz, Paweł. 2009. “Zasady mediacji” [Principles of mediation”], in Mediacje. Teoria i praktyka [Mediations. Theory and Practice], ed. by Ewa Gmurzyńska and Rafał Morek, 91–105. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Węgrzecki, Adam. 2014: Wokół filozofii spotkania [Around Philosophy of Encounter]. Kraków: Wydawnictwo WAM.Google Scholar
Winslade, John and Gerald Monk. 2000. Narrative Mediation. A New Approach to Conflict Resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
. 2008. Practicing Narrative Mediation. Loosening the Grip of Conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2008. “‘How history is made’ – The origins and aims of the project”, in The Discursive Construction of History: Remembering the Wehrmacht’s War of Annihilation, ed. by Hannes Heer et al., xii–xvi. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth / Paul Chilton (eds.). 2005. A New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis. Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wojtyła, Karol, 1979. The Acting Person. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Weigand, Edda
2021. Dialogue. Language and Dialogue 11:3 ► pp. 457 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.