Cover not available
Part of
From Pragmatics to Dialogue
Edited by Edda Weigand and Istvan Kecskes
[Dialogue Studies 31] 2018
► pp. 45–60

Moving beyond pragmatics

The role of dialogue in studies of “rhetoric in situ”

For centuries, scholars have approached the study of rhetoric as a language-based method of analysis for understanding persuasion and as argumentation. However, more recently, scholars of rhetoric have expanded their focus to include images, architectures, and events. One development in this area has been “rhetoric in situ,” generally referring to studies of communication that present a richer understanding. In this chapter, I will first explore the scholarship related to the development of ethno-methodological techniques for understanding rhetoric and their relationships to linguistic pragmatics. Then, I will consider the ways that dialogue theory, as advanced by Edda Weigand, would enrich the study of rhetoric in situ, especially given their shared goals of understanding the contexts of lived experience.
Keywords: rhetorical criticism, rhetoric in situ, participant-observation, dialogue theory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Rhetoric in situ
  • 3.Linguistic pragmatics, sociolinguistics and rhetoric
  • 4.Weigand’s dialogue theory
  • 5.Rhetoric in situ and the mixed game model
  • References
Published online: 5 October 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.31.04ada
References
Aakhus, Mark
2007 “Understanding ordinary democracy: The intersection of discourse and rhetorical analysis”. In The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy, ed. by Karen Tracy, James P. McDaniel and Bruce E. Gronbeck, 205–217. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Adams, Jennifer
2015 “Home as a place of protest: Scott and Helen Nearing and the construction of the modern American homestead.” In Stories of Home: Place Identity, Exile ed. by D. Chawla and S. Holman Jones, 135–148. London: Lexington.Google Scholar
2017 “Self-interest and social concern.” In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue, ed. by Edda Weigand, 294–306. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aristotle
2007 On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse, 2nd edition, transl. by G. Kenney. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L.
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth
1969 A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of CA.Google Scholar
Cissna, Kenneth and Rob Anderson
2008 “Dialogic Rhetoric, Co-authorship, and Moments of Meeting.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 23–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight
1992a “Ethnography, Rhetoric, and Performance’ [Book review].” Quarterly Journal of Speech 78 (1): 80–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992b “Life in Big Red: struggle and accommodations in a Chicago polyethnic tenement.” In Structuring Diversity, ed. by L. Lamphere, 95–144. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Copland, Fiona and Angela Creese
2015 Linguistic Ethnography: Collecting and Analysing and Presenting Data. London: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Creece Angela
2008 “Linguistic ethnography.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2nd edition, volume 10: Research Methods in Language and Education ed. by K. A. King and N. H. Hornberger, 229–241. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Endres, Danielle and Samantha Senda-Cook
2011 “Location Matters: The Rhetoric of Place in Protest.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 97(3): 257–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, Greg, Carol Blair, and Brian Ott
2010 Places of Public Memory: The Rhetoric of Museums and Monuments. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Foss, Sonja
2008 Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice, 2nd edition. Long Grove, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Grice, H.
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Harlow, Rachel M.
2016 “Souvenir Battlefields: How Presidents Use Rhetoric of Place to Shape the American Ethos.” American Communication Journal 18(1): 45–62.Google Scholar
Hess, Aaron
2011 “Critical-rhetorical ethnography: Rethinking the place and process of Rhetoric.” Communication Studies 62(2): 127–152. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Korta, Kepa, and John Perry
2015 “Pragmatics.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E. Zalta. URL =[URL].Google Scholar
Jacobs, Scott
2000 “Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics.” Argumentation 143: 261–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey
1983 The Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas
2006 “Ethnography and Conversation Analysis: What is the Context of an Utterance?” In Emergent Methods in Social Research, ed. by Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and Patricia Leavy, 55–94. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Michael, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senra-Cook
2011 “Articulating Rhetorical Field Methods: Challenges and Tensions.” Western Journal of Communication 75(4): 386–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Middleton, Michael, Aaron Hess, Danielle Endres, and Samantha Senda-Cook
2015 Participatory Critical Rhetoric: Theoretical and Methodological Foundations for Studying Rhetoric in Situ. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Moerman, M.
1987 Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversation Analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Prasch, Allison M.
2016 “Toward a Rhetorical Theory of Deixis.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 102(2): 166–193.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosaldo, Michelle Z.
1982 “The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy.” Language in Society 11(2): 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, Muriel
2008 The Ethnography of Communication: An Introduction, vol. 14. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatley, H.
2000/2008 Culturally Speaking: Culture, Communication and Politeness Theor. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen
2007 “Introduction: A Moment of Ordinary Democracy. In The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy, ed. by Karen Tracy, James P. McDaniel and Bruce E. Gronbeck 3–21. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Tracy, Karen, James P. McDaniel, and Bruce E. Gronbeck
(ed.) 2007 The Prettier Doll: Rhetoric, Discourse, and Ordinary Democracy. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Trognon, Alain
2013 “Pragmatics Re-Established on its Feet. Weigand’s Mixed Game Model 2010.” Language and Dialogue 3(3): 457–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weigand, Edda
2008a “Introduction: Rhetoric or how to integrate the different voices.” In Dialogue and Rhetoric, ed. by Edda Weigand, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008b Dialogue and Rhetoric. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Language as Dialogue: From Rules to Principles of Probability. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Dialogue: the Mixed Game. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, Richard and Karen Wolf
2012 “The Role of Ethnography in Rhetorical Analysis: The New Rhetorical Turn”. Empedocles: European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication 3(1): 7–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Săftoiu, Răzvan
2019. The Dialogic Turn in Language Study. Language and Dialogue 9:3 ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.