Cover not available
Part of
Language and Social Interaction at Home and School
Edited by Letizia Caronia
[Dialogue Studies 32] 2021
► pp. 121–152

Chapter 3
Talking to children with atypical development

A study on the practice of asking ‘Are you going to’ questions

 | University of Portsmouth
Interactional studies of children with language impairments and their habitual interlocutors are key to understanding reciprocal adaptations in communication. The chapter is based on video recorded observations of three families at home, each with a child with Down Syndrome of approximately 6 years of age. The analysis focuses on the parental practice of asking the children ‘Are you going to’ questions. The results document two main uses: ‘request for information’ and ‘action solicit’. The analysis suggests that using the question as action solicit may hamper children’s comprehension and undermine their agency. A comparison with other action solicits and relative frequencies of use suggests family styles that either privilege a Requester’s Perspective or the Child’s Perspective. It is argued that, by privileging the Child’s Perspective, parents limit the imposition on children but subtract potential for normative and epistemic socialisation, as well as opportunities for the child to display their collaboration.
Keywords: conversation analysis, atypical interaction, children with down syndrome, action formation, ‘are you going to’ questions, action solicits, directives
Article outline
  • 1.Interactional studies of children with atypical development
  • 2.Communication in children with down syndrome
    • 2.1Focus of the study
    • 2.2The ‘are you going to’ question and the role of time in action solicits
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Data collection and preparation
    • 3.3Analysis
  • 4.Asking ‘are you going to’ questions to children with down syndrome
    • 4.1The ‘are you going to’ questions as requests for information
    • 4.2‘Are you going to/are you going/you gonna’ questions as action solicits
    • 4.3Ambiguous AYGT/AYG/YG questions
    • 4.4AYGT questions oriented to divert the child from another course of action
    • 4.5Variability in use of AYGT/AYG/YG questions
  • 5.Discussion
  • Acknowledgment
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 13 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.32.03fas
References (61)
References
Antaki, Charles, W. Finlay, Chris Walton, and Louise Pate. 2008. “Offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities: an interactional study.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 52(12): 1165–1175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles., Ray Wilkinson. 2013. “Conversation Analysis and the Study of Atypical Populations.” In Handbook of Conversation Analysia, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 533–550. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Aronsson, Karin and Asta Cekaite. 2011. “Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics.” Discourse & Society 22(2): 137–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, Catherine E., Dennis Day, Ulrika Ferm, Anders R. Hougaard, Gitte Rasmussen, and Gunilla Thunberg. 2011. “Treating the actions of children as sensible.” Journal of interactional research in communication disorders 2(2): 153–182.Google Scholar
Cambridge English Dictionary. “Be going to.” Accessed December 12, 2019, [URL].
Cebula, Katie R., D. G. Moore, and Jennifer G. Wishart. 2010. “Social cognition in children with Down’s syndrome: Challenges to research and theory building.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54: 113–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Robin S. and Linda J. Hesketh. 2000. “Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome.” Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 6(2): 84–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. and John Heritage. 2014. “Benefactors and beneficiaries.” In Requesting in social interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 55–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2014. “What does grammar tell us about action?.” Pragmatics 24(3): 623–647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Curl, Traci S. and Paul Drew. 2008. “Contingency and action: A comparison of two forms of requesting.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(2): 129–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. “Multimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 46: 1–7. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobbinson, Sushie, Mick Perkins and Jill Boucher. 2003. “The interactional significance of formulas in autistic language.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17(4–5): 299–307. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul. 1997. “‘Open’class repair initiators in response to sequential sources of troubles in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 28(1): 69–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Enfield, N. J. and Jack Sidnell. 2017. “On the concept of action in the study of interaction.” Discourse Studies 19(5): 515–535. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra. 2015. “The value of conversation analysis for the study of children’s mental health.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Child Mental Health, ed. by Jessica Nina Lester and Michelle O’Reillly, 3–24. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra, Heather Loyd, and Vincenzo Padiglione. 2007. “Children’s socialization into cleaning practices: a cross-cultural perspective.” Discourse & Society 18(1): 11–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra, Janhavi Shukla, and Stephanie Bennett. 2017. “Find the hidden object. Understanding play in psychological assessments.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 323. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fasulo, Alessandra, Jörg Zinken, and Katarzyna Zinken. 2016. “Asking ‘What about’questions in chronic illness self-management meetings.” Patient Education and Counseling 99(6): 917–925. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anne E., Rochel Gelman, and Lila R. Gleitman. 2014. “The course of language learning in children with Down syndrome.” In Constraints on Language Acquisition: Studies of Atypical Children, ed. by Helen Tager-Flusberg, 91–140. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gardner, Sushie and Michael Forrester (eds.). 2009. Analysing interactions in childhood: Insights from conversation analysis. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2000. “Action and embodiment within situated human interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie H. and Asta Cekaite. 2014. “Orchestrating directive trajectories in communicative projects in family interaction.” In Requesting in Social Interaction, ed. by Paul Drew and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, 185–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goody, Esther N. 1978. “Towards a theory of questions.” In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther Goody, 17–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, Marianne, Kees De Bot, and Virginia Volterra. 2008. “Gestures and some key issues in the study of language development.” Gesture 8(2): 149–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kent, Ray D. and Houri K. Vorperian. 2013. “Speech impairment in Down syndrome: A review.” Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research (Online) 56(1): 178. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Kidwell, Mardi. 2013. “Interaction among Children.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 511–533. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 1989. “Be going to and will: A pragmatic account.” Journal of Linguistics 25(2): 291–317. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John. 2015. “Well-prefaced turns in English conversation: A conversation analytic perspective.” Journal of Pragmatics 88: 88–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, David Jeffery, and Christopher R. Engelke. 2013. “A primer for doing talk–in–interaction research in augmentative and alternative communication.” Augmentative and Alternative Communication 29(1): 3–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, D. Jeffery, Gregory W. Lesher, Bryan J. Moulton, and Brian Roark. 2012. “The application of natural language processing to augmentative and alternative communication.” Assistive Technology 24(1): 14–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 2004a. “A note on laughter in ‘male–female’ interaction.” Discourse Studies 6(1): 117–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004b. “Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lanzoni, Monica, Agnieszka Kinsner–Ovaskainen, Joan Morris, Simona Martin, Giovanni La Placa, and Laura Spirito. 2019. EUROCAT – Surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe: epidemiology of Down syndrome 1990–2014. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Accessed January 1 2020, [URL]. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laws, Glynis and Dorothy V. M. Bishop. 2004. “Pragmatic language impairment and social deficits in Williams syndrome: a comparison with Down’s syndrome and specific language impairment.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 39(1): 45–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Action formation and ascription.” In The handbook of conversation analysis, 103–130. Malden, MA: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
MacLean, William E. and Sigan L. Hartley. 2005. “Down syndrome.” In Encyclopedia of Human Development, ed. by Neil Salkind, 394–396. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. 2013. “Everyone and no one to turn to: Intellectual roots and contexts for conversation analysis.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 11–31. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Maynard, Douglas W. and Courtney L. Marlaire. 1999. “Good reasons for bad testing performance: the interactional substrate of educational testing.” In Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction, ed. by Dana Kovarsky, Judith F. Duchan, and Madeline Maxwell, 171–196. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2017. “Precision timing and timed embeddedness of imperatives in embodied courses of action: Examples from French.” In Imperative Turns at Talk: The Design of Directives in Action, ed. by Marja Leena Sorjonen, Liisa Raevaara, and Elizabeth, Couper-Kuhlen, 65–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muskett, Tom, Richard Body, and Mick Perkins. 2012. “Uncovering the dynamic in static assessment interaction.” Child Language Teaching and Therapy 28(1): 87–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Muskett, Tom, Mick Perkins, Judy Clegg, and Richard Body. 2010. “Inflexibility as an interactional phenomenon: Using conversation analysis to re–examine a symptom of autism.” Clinical linguistics & phonetics 24(1): 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newton, Richard. 2015. “Neuropsychiatry of Down syndrome.” In Down Syndrome–Current Perspectives, ed. by Richard W. Newton, Shiela Puri, and Liz Marder, 238–69. London: Mac Keith Press.Google Scholar
Norén, Niklas and Maja Sigurd Pilesjö. 2016. “Supporting a child with multiple disabilities to participate in social interaction: The case of asking a question.” Clinical linguistics & phonetics 30(10): 790–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Sushie and Carolina Izquierdo. 2009. “Responsibility in childhood: Three developmental trajectories.” Ethos 37(4): 391–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor and Olga Solomon. 2010. “Autistic sociality.” Ethos 38(1): 69–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey. 2018. “Which epistemics? Whose conversation analysis?.” Discourse Studies 20(1): 57–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond Geoffrey, John C. Heritage. 2013. “One question after another: Same–turn–repair in the formation of yes/no type initiating actions.” In Conversational Repair and Human Understanding, ed. by Makoto Hyashi, Geoffrey Raymond and Jack Sidnell, 213–272. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Giovanni. 2018. “Composite Social Actions: The Case of Factual Declaratives in Everyday Interaction.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 51(4): 379–397. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. “On doing ‘being ordinary’.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by Maxwell J. Atkinson and John Heritage, 413–429. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1993. “Reflections on quantification in the study of conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 26: 99–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996. “Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action.” American Journal of Sociology 102(1): 161–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sidnell, Jack. 2005. Talk and Practical Epistemology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sterponi, Laura and Kenton de Kirby. 2016. “A Multidimensional Reappraisal of Language in Autism: Insights from a Discourse Analytic Study.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 46: 394–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2015. “Coding social interaction: A heretical approach in conversation analysis?” Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(1): 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turk, Jeremy. 2015. “Neuropsychiatry of Down Syndrome Part 2: Developmental, Psychological and Psychiatric Function.” In Down Syndrome: Current Perspectives, ed. by Richard Newton, Shiela Puri and Liz Marder, 248–257. MacKeith Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Ray. 2019. “Atypical interaction: Conversation analysis and communicative impairments.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(3): 281–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Woolfson, Lisa and E. Grant. 2006. “Authoritative parenting and parental stress in parents of pre‐school and older children with developmental disabilities.” Child: Care, Health and Development 32(2): 177–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wootton, Anthony J. 1990. “Pointing and interaction initiation: The behaviour of young children with Down’s syndrome when looking at books.” Journal of Child Language 17(3): 565–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. E. and Issy Bray. 2000. “Estimating birth prevalence of Down’s syndrome.” Journal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics 5(2): 89–97.Google Scholar
Zinken, Jörg. 2016. Requesting Responsibility: The Morality of Grammar in Polish and English Family Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar