Cover not available
Part of
Disability in Dialogue
Edited by Jessica M.F. Hughes and Mariaelena Bartesaghi
[Dialogue Studies 33] 2023
► pp. 149–169

Unearthing the concepts that bury us

ORCID logo | The Alliance for Citizen Directed Supports
This chapter begins with the claim that the prominent definition of dialogue as co-present speech is insufficient, if not damaging, to non-neurotypical persons. Not only are people with disabilities excluded from socially relevant dialogues about their own experiences, but the dialogues between people with disabilities are not granted the status of dialogue. As an autistic individual, filmmaker, and activist, my aim is to first, deconstruct the assumptions at the base of this exclusion and, most importantly, replace them with my own experience of multimodal intersubjectivity. My analysis of a transcript I created from my own film is the data for my argument. I advocate for a multi-sensory, multimodal approach to communication and disability.
Keywords: disability, neurotypicality, dialogue, multimodality, multisensory communication, transcription
Article outline
  • 1.Unearthing the concepts and tools that bury us
  • 2.A re-definition of dialogue
    • 2.1The limitations and dangers of a narrow definition of dialogue
    • 2.2Toward a more expansive definition of dialogue
      • 2.1.1Multimodal communication
      • 2.1.2Multimodal intersubjectivity
      • 2.1.3Multithreadedness
  • 3.Transcribing more expansive understandings of dialogue
    • 3.1Transcript 1
      • 3.1.1Transcript 1
      • 3.1.2An insider’s perspective based on transcript 1
      • 3.1.3Transcript 1’s shortcomings
    • 3.2Video recording and transcript 2
      • 3.2.1Transcript 2
      • 3.2.2Unpacking transcript 2
  • 4.Compare and contrast transcript 1 and transcript 2
    • 4.1What of greater importance emerges
  • 5.The insider’s perspective versus Shotter’s writing from within the moment
    • 5.1Lingering residue
    • 5.2Seeking out other ways forward
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 19 September 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ds.33.07sav
References (43)
References
Abram, David. 1996. The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Auyeung, Bonnie, Baron-Cohen, Simon, Ashwin, Emma, Knickmeyer, Rebecca, Taylor, Kevin and Gerald Hackett. 2009. “Fetal Testosterone and Autistic Traits.” British Journal of Psychology 100(1): 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auyeung, Bonnie, Taylor, Kevin, Hackett, Gerald, and Simon Baron-Cohen. 2010. “Fetal Testosterone and Autistic Traits in 18 to 24-Month-Old Children.” Molecular Autism 1(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggs, Amanda. 2009. “Up in the Clouds and Down in the Valley: My Richness and Yours.” Disability Studies Quarterly 30(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baggs, Mel. [@silentmiaow]. 2007. In My Language [Video]. YouTube. [URL]
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, trans. by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. by Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bara, Bruno G., Bucciarelli, Monica and Livia Colle. 2001. “Communicative Abilities in Autism: Evidence for Attentional Deficits.” Brain and Language 77(2): 216–240. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2000. “Autism and ‘Theory of Mind.’” In The Applied Psychologist, ed. by James Hartley and Alan Branthwaite, 181–194. London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Bartesaghi, Mariaelena and Theresa Castor. 2009. “Tracing Our Steps through Communication Social Construction: Six Propositions for How to Go On.” In Socially Constructing Communication, ed. by Gloria J. Galanes and Wendy Leeds-Hurwitz, 225–243. New York: Hampton Press, Inc.Google Scholar
Bezemer, Jeff and Diane Mavers. 2011. “Multimodal Transcription as Academic Practice: A Social Semiotic Perspective.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14(3): 191–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bragazzi, Nicola, Giovanni Del Puente, and Werner Maria Natta. 2014. “Somatic Perception, Cultural Differences and Immigration: Results from Administration of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) to a Sample of Immigrants.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management 7: 161–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Emma, Simon Baron-Cohen, Bonnie Auyeung, Rebecca Knickmeyer, Kevin Taylor, and Gerald Hackett. 2006. “Fetal Testosterone and Empathy: Evidence from the Empathy Quotient (EQ) and the ‘Reading the Mind in the Eyes’ Test.” Social Neuroscience 1(2): 135–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chura, Lindsey R., Michael V. Lombardo, Emma, Ashwin, Bonnie Auyeung, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Edward T. Bullmore, and Simon Baron-Cohen. 2010. “Organizational Effects of Fetal Testosterone on Human Corpus Callosum Size and Asymmetry.” Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(1): 122–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csordas, Thomas J. 2008. “Intersubjectivity and Intercorporeality.” Subjectivity 22(1): 110–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dzokoto, Vivian. 2010. “Different Ways of Feeling: Emotion and Somatic Awareness in Ghanaians and Euro-Americans.” Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 4(2): 68–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 2004. “A Competent Speaker Who Can’t Speak: The Social Life of Aphasia.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2): 151–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Majorie, Charles Goodwin, and Asta Cekaite. 2012. “Emotion as Stance.” In Emotion in Interaction, ed. by Marja-Leena Sorjonen and Anssi Peräkylä, 16–41. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Groark, Kevin P. 2013. “Toward a Cultural Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity: The Extended Relational Field of the Tzotzil Maya of Highland Chiapas, Mexico.” Language and Communication 33(3): 278–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hak, Tony. 1999. “‘Text’ and ‘Con-text’: Talk Bias in Studies of Health Care Work.” In Talk, Work, and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation, and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 427–52. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higham, James P. and Eileen A. Hebets. 2013. “An Introduction to Multimodal Communication.” Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67(9): 1381–1388. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2011. Being Alive: Essays on Movement, Knowledge and Description. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, Tim and Gisli Palsson. 2014. Biosocial Becomings: Integrating Social and Biological Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klin, Ami, Warren Jones, Robert Schultz, and Fred Volkmar. 2003. “The Enactive Mind, or from Actions to Cognition: Lessons from Autism.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358(1430): 345–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knickmeyer, Rebecca, Simon Baron-Cohen, Peter Raggatt, Kevin Taylor, and Gerald Hackett. 2006. “Fetal Testosterone and Empathy.” Hormones and Behavior 49(3): 282–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mukhopadhyay, Tito. 2011. How Can I Talk if My Lips Don’t Move: Inside My Autistic Mind. New York: Arcade Pub.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 1979. “Transcription as Theory.” In Developmental Pragmatics, ed. by Elinor Ochs and Bambi Schieffelin, 43–72. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor, Solomon, Olga and Laura Sterponi. 2005. “Limitations and Transformations of Habitus in Child-Directed Communication.” Discourse Studies 7(4–5): 547–583. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Melissa. 2008. “Making Scenes.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 22(3): 234–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, Dawn. 2009. “The Silence between: An Autoethnographic Examination of the Language Prejudice and Its Impact on the Assessment of Autistic and Animal Intelligence.” Disability Studies Quarterly 30(1). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reno, Joshua. 2012. “Technically Speaking: On Equipping and Evaluating ‘Unnatural’ Language Learners.” American Anthropologist 114(3): 406–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rooy, Robert (Director). 2017. Deej: Inclusion Shouldn’t Be a Lottery [Film]. Rooy Media LLC.Google Scholar
Ruxton, Graeme D. and Martin H. Schaefer. 2011. “Resolving Current Disagreements and Ambiguities in the Terminology of Animal Communication.” Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24(12): 2574–2585. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Savarese, Ralph. 2013. “From Neurodiversity to Neurocosmopolitanism: Beyond Mere Acceptance and Inclusion.” In Ethics and Neurodiversity, ed. by C. D. Herrera and Alexander Perry, 191–205. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, John. 1999. Writing from within ‘Living Moments’: ‘Withness-Writing’ Rather than ‘Aboutness-Writing’” [Paper presentation]. Fourth National Writing Across the Curriculum Conference: Multiple Intelligences, Cornell University.
. 2016. Deep Dialogicality, Human Becomings, and Leaders as ‘Founders of Discursivity’ [Paper presentation]. Qualitative Research in Management and Organization Conference (QRM), Albuquerque, NM.
Sirota, Karen Gainer. 2010. “Narratives of Distinction: Personal Life Narrative as a Technology of the Self in the Everyday Lives and Relational Worlds of Children with Autism.” Ethos 38(1): 93–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solomon, Olga. 2010. “What a Dog Can Do: Children with Autism and Therapy Dogs in Social Interaction.” Ethos 38(1): 143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Honk, Jack, Dennis J. Schutter, Peter A. Bos, Anne K. Kruijt, Eef G. Lentjes, and Simon Baron-Cohen. 2011. “Testosterone Administration Impairs Cognitive Empathy in Women Depending on Second-to-Fourth Digit Ratio.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(8): 3448–3452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wasiolek, Eric. 1984. “Cover Commentary on M. Bakhtin.” Problems of Dostoevksy’s Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press. [URL]
Williams, Donna. 2003. Exposure Anxiety – The Invisible Cage: An Exploration of Self-Protection Responses in the Autism Spectrum and Beyond. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar