Cover not available
Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 7:1 (2018) ► pp.45–67

Het gebruik van de Nederlandse plaatsingswerkwoorden ‘zetten’ en ‘leggen’ door Franstalige leerders van het Nederlands

| Université de Liege
This research presents the results of a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the use of the Dutch placement verbs zetten (‘put’) and leggen (‘lay’) by French-speaking learners of Dutch. The experiment consisted of a productive task. The results confirm that the use of Dutch placement verbs is problematic for French-speaking learners, but they also reveal some important tendencies. First, our analysis demonstrates that French-speaking learners tend to underuse these verbs, which can be explained by the fact that placement events in French are often described by means of a neutral verb such as ‘mettre’ (‘put’) as opposed to the more specific verbs in Dutch. Secondly, the learners occasionally also tend to overuse the placement verbs in contexts where such verbs are not allowed, an observation which is seemingly paradoxical to the first one. Thirdly, learners also tend to confuse ‘zetten’ with ‘leggen’ and vice versa.
Keywords: second language acquisition, placement verbs, placement events, Dutch, French-speaking learners
Article outline
  • 1.Inleiding
  • 2.Plaatsingswerkwoorden en vreemdetaalverwerving
    • 2.1Typologische achtergrond
    • 2.2Kort overzicht van de Nederlandse plaatsingswerkwoorden
  • 3.Hypotheses
  • 4.Methodologie
    • 4.1Deelnemers
    • 4.2Experimentele setup
    • 4.3Codering van de gegevens
  • 5.Resultaten
    • 5.1Franstalige moedertaalsprekers
    • 5.2Nederlandstalige moedertaalsprekers
    • 5.3Franstalige leerders van het Nederlands
      • Bevinding 1.Overgebruik van zetten en leggen
      • Bevinding 2.Ondergebruik van zetten en leggen
      • Bevinding 3.Verwarring tussen zetten en leggen
    • 5.4Comparatieve analyse DuL1 vs. DuL2 van het gebruik van zetten, leggen en alternatieven
  • 6.Discussie
  • 7.Conclusie
  • Notes
  • Bibliografie

Article language: Dutch

Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.17004.hey
References (26)
Bibliografie
Alferink, I., & Gullberg, M. (2014). French-Dutch bilinguals do not maintain obligatory semantic distinctions: Evidence from placement verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 171, 22–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ameka, F. K. & Levinson, S. C. (2007). The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals, and other beasts. Linguistics, 451, 847–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berthele, R. (2012). On the use of PUT verbs by multilingual speakers of Romansh. In B. Narasimhan, & A. Kopecka (Eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective (pp. 145–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowerman, M. (1996). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. A. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. F. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cadierno, T., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. & Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2016). Semantic categorization of placement verbs in L1 and L2 Danish and Spanish. Language Learning, 66(1), 191–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chenu, F., & Jisa, H. (2006a). Acquisition of putting event verbs in French. Congresbijdrage voor de 31e jaarlijkse Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD 31), Boston, 3–5 november 2006.Google Scholar
(2006b). Caused motion constructions and semantic generality in early acquisition of French. In E. V. Clark & B. F. Kelly (Ed.), Constructions in acquisition (pp. 233–261). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Choi, S., & Bowerman, M. (1991). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41(1–3), 83–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Space under construction: Language-specific spatial categorization in first language acquisition. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–42). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M. (2009). Reconstructing verb meaning in a second language: How English speakers of L2 Dutch talk and gesture about placement. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 71, 221–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Language-specific encoding of placement events in gestures. In E. Pederson & J. Bohnemeyer (Eds.) Event representation in language and cognition (pp. 166–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gullberg, M., & Narasimhan, B. (2010). What gestures reveal about the development of semantic distinctions in Dutch children’s placement verbs. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 239–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hellerstedt, M. (2013). L’utilisation et l’acquisition des verbes de position en suédois L1 et L2 (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Université Paris-Sorbonne.Google Scholar
Hickmann, M. (2007). Static and dynamic location in French: developmental and cross-linguistic perspectives. In M. Aurnague, M. Hickmann, & L. Vieu (Eds.), The categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition (205–231). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. & Hendricks, H. (2006). Static and dynamic location in French and in English. First Language, 261, 103–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemmens, M. (2002). The semantic network of Dutch posture verbs. In J. Newman (Ed.), The linguistics of sitting, standing and lying (pp. 103–140). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006a). Caused posture: Experiential patterns emerging from corpus research. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus based approaches to syntax and lexis (pp. 261–296). Berlijn: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2006b). Analyse cognitive des verbes de placement en néerlandais. In Ph. Hiligsmans, L. Beheydt, L. Degand, P. Godin, & S. Vanderlinden (Eds.), Neerlandistiek in Frankrijk en Franstalig België/Les études néerandaises en France et Belgique francophone. Langages et expressions (pp. 131–150). Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit van Leuven.Google Scholar
Lemmens, M., & Perrez, J. (2010). On the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch: A corpus-based study. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(2), 315–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). A quantitative analysis of the use of posture verbs by French-speaking learners of Dutch. CogniTextes 81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, M., & Slobin, D. (2008). Positie- en bewegingswerkwoorden in het Nederlands, het Engels en het Frans. In Ph. Hiligsman, M. Baelen, A. -L. Leloup, & L. Rasier (Eds.), Verslagen en Mededelingen van de Koninklijke Academie voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde, 1181, 17–32.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Narasimhan, B., & Gullberg, M. (2011). The role of input frequency and semantic transparency in the acquisition of verb meaning: Evidence from placement verbs in Tamil and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 381, 504–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, volume 1: Concept structuring system. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Van Bergen, G., & Flecken, M. (2017). Putting things in new places: Linguistic experience modulates the predictive power of placement verb semantics. Journal of Memory and Language, 921, 26–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Madlener-Charpentier, Karin & Elsa Liste Lamas
2022. Path Under Construction: Challenges Beyond S-Framed Motion Event Construal in L2 German. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.