Article published in:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 9:1/2 (2020) ► pp. 120


Andrich, D.
(1982) An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR-20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern. Education Research and Perspectives, 9(1), 95–104.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H.
(2008) Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baudonck, N., Van Lierde, K., D’Haeseleer, E., & Dhooge, I.
(2015) Nasalance and nasality in children with cochlear implants and children with hearing aids. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 79(4), 541–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boonen, N., Kloots, H., Verhoeven, J., & Gillis, S.
(2019) Can listeners hear the difference between children with normal hearing and children with a hearing impairment? Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 33(4), 316-333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bramley, T.
(2007) Paired comparison methods. In P. Newton, J.-A. Baird, H. Goldstein, H. Patrick, & P. Tymms (Eds.), Techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards (pp. 246–294). London: QCA.Google Scholar
(2015) Investigating the reliability of Adaptive Comparative Judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Assessment Research Report.Google Scholar
Chin, S. B., & Kuhns, M. J.
(2014) Proximate factors associated with speech intelligibility in children with cochlear implants: A preliminary study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 28(7–8), 532–542. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
(2003) A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ertmer, D. J.
(2007) Speech intelligibility in young cochlear implant recipients: Gains during year three. The Volta Review, 107(2), 85–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fang, H.-Y., Ko, H.-C., Wang, N.-M., Fang, T.-J., Chao, W.-C., Tsou, Y.-T., & Wu, C.-M.
(2014) Auditory performance and speech intelligibility of Mandarin-speaking children implanted before age 5. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 78(5), 799–803. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flipsen, P., & Colvard, L. G.
(2006) Intelligibility of conversational speech produced by children with cochlear implants. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39(2), 93–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gillis, S.
(2017) Speech and language in congenitally deaf children with a cochlear implant. In A. Bar-On, & D. Ravid (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders: Theoretical, empirical, and applied linguistic perspectives (pp. 763–790). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hide, Ø.
(2013) Acoustic features of speech by young cochlear implant users. A comparison with normal-hearing and hearing-aided age mates. Ongepubliceerd proefschrift, Universiteit Antwerpen.Google Scholar
Kral, A., & O’Donoghue, G.
(2010) Profound deafness in childhood. The New England Journal of Medicine, 363(15), 1438–1450. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kral, A., & Sharma, A.
(2012) Developmental neuroplasticity after cochlear implantation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(2), 111–122. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D.
(2004) Human judgment: The eye of the beholder. Hongkong: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Lesterhuis, M., Donche, V., De Maeyer, S., Van Daal, T., Van Gasse, R., Coertjens, L., Verhavert, S., Mortier, A., Coenen, T., Vlerick, P., Vanhoof, J., & Van Petegem, P.
(2015) Competenties kwaliteitvol beoordelen: brengt een comparatieve aanpak soelaas? Tijdschrift voor hoger onderwijs, 33(2), 55–67.Google Scholar
Lesterhuis, M., Verhavert, S., Coertjens, L., Donche, V., & De Maeyer, S.
(2017) Comparative judgment as a promising alternative to score competences. In E. Cano, & G. Ion (Eds.), Innovative practices for higher education assessment and measurement (pp. 119–138). Hershey: IGI Global. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McGarr, N.
(1983) The intelligibility of deaf speech to experienced and inexperienced listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 26(3), 451–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, N.
(2013) Measuring up to speech intelligibility. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 48(6), 601–612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Munson, B., Johnson, J. M., & Edwards, J.
(2012) The role of experience in the perception of phonetic detail in children’s speech: A comparison between speech-language pathologists and clinically untrained listeners. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 124–139. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, J. G., & Geers, A. E.
(2007) Will they catch up? The role of age at cochlear implantation in the spoken language development of children with severe to profound hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1048–1062. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, A.
(2012) Comparative judgement for assessment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(2), 157–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team
(2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienne, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. [http://​www​.R​-project​.org/]
Schiavetti, N.
(1992) Scaling procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In R. D. Kent (Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement and management (pp. 11–34). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thurstone, L.
(1927) A law of comparative judgment. Psychological Review, 34, 273–286. Herdrukt in Psychological Review 1994, 101(2), 266–270. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Lierde, K. M., Vinck, B. M., Baudonck, N., De Vel, E., & Dhooge, I.
(2005) Comparison of the overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice characteristics between children using cochlear implants and those using bilateral hearing aids: A pilot study. International Journal of Audiology, 44(8), 452–465. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanormelingen, L., De Maeyer, S., & Gillis, S.
(2016) A comparison of maternal and child language in normally-hearing and hearing-impaired children with cochlear implants. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 7(2), 145–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, J., Hide, Ø., De Maeyer, S., Gillis, S., & Gillis, S.
(2016) Hearing impairment and vowel production. A comparison between normally hearing, hearing-aided and cochlear implanted Dutch children. Journal of Communication Disorders, 591, 24–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, C., & Pollitt, A.
(2012) Using Adaptive Comparative Judgement to obtain a highly reliable rank order in summative assessment. Gedownload via https://​cerp​.aqa​.org​.uk​/sites​/default​/files​/pdf​_upload​/CERP​_RP​_CW​_20062012​_2​.pdf [07.02.2019]. Manchester: Centre for Education Research and Policy.


Identificeerbaarheid van kinderen met een gehoorbeperking
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Morris, David Jackson & Daan Velde
2021.  In The Handbook of Language and Speech Disorders,  pp. 53 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.