The present study is inspired by the often heard Chinese university level students’ complaint that they do not improve in English proficiency during their university courses. With a pre-post design, the study explores the potential gains in language development in free response data (writing samples) of three groups of L2 learners: a senior high school group and two university groups of different proficiency levels. Four writing samples, two collected at the beginning and two at the end of the students’ respective courses, were scored holistically on general proficiency and analytically on 47 complexity measures in a computerized tool (Synlex Analyzer). The holistic scores showed some improvement over time for the high school group, but not for the university groups. The analytical measures showed improvements in fairly different aspects of the written language for the three groups, suggesting that at different levels of proficiency different variables may develop. The highest level group actually regressed in almost all syntactic variables, but additional hand coded measures point to a subtle move toward a more academic style of writing with more non-finite constructions. The findings suggest that no single complexity measure is robust for all proficiency levels and that for the highest levels, other metrics tapping into inter-clausal complexity should be added.
(1989) The attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11(1), 17–34.
Biber, D., & Gray, B.
(2010) Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20.
(2013) The development of complexity in Second Language Acquisition: A dynamic system approach. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Brussels.
(2009) Emergent l2 German writing ability in a curricular context: A longitudinal study of grammatical metaphor. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 50–66.
(2010) A dynamic perspective on second language development. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen.
Crossley, S.A., & McNamara, D.S.
(2009) Computational assessment of lexical differences in L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(2), 119–135.
De Beaugrande, R.A., & Dressler, W.U.
(1981) Introduction to text linguistics, Vol. 21. London: Longman.
De Bot, K.
(2008) Introduction: Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166–178.
(2002) Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 223–236.
(2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352.
Ellis, R., & Barkhuizen, G.
(2005) Analysing learner language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(1995) The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139–155.
(1994) Lexical and syntactic features of ESL writing by students at different levels of L2 proficiency. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 414–420.
Fillmore, C., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M.C.
(1988) Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language, 64(3), 501–538.
Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
(1996) The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323.
(2007) Discourse coherence and LSA. In T. Landauser, D. McNamara, D. Simon, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp.167–184). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Graesser, A.C., McNamara, D.S., & Louwerse, M.M.
(2003) What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text? In A.P. Sweet & C.E. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York: Guilford Publications.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.
(1999) Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London/New York: Cassell.
(1996) Early L2 writing development: A study of autobiographical essays by university-level students of Russian. The Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 309–326.
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F.
(2009) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 461–473.
(2011) A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL Writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 36–62.
(2012) The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190–208.
(2000) The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Minnen, G., Carroll, J., & Pearce, D.
(2001) Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3), 207–223.
(2000) Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners. (Doctoral dissertation). Manoa, HI: University of Hawaii.
(2003) Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics, 24(4), 492–518.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F.H.
(1983) Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Native-like selection and native-like fluency. In J.C. Richards & R.W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). New York: Longman.
Penris, W., & Verspoor, M.
in press). Academic writing development: A complex, dynamic process.
(2003) Research on second language writing: An overview of what we investigate and how. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 35–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(Eds.) (2000) Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmid, M.S., Verspoor, M.H., & MacWhinney, B.
(2011) Coding and extracting data. In M.H. Verspoor, K. De Bot, & W. Lowie (Eds.), A dynamic approach to second language development: Methods and techniques (pp. 39–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009) Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency and lexis. Applied linguistics, 30(4), 510–532.
(2013) Chunks in L2 development: A usage-based perspective. (Doctoral dissertation). University of Groningen.
Spoelman, M., & Verspoor, M.H.
(2010) Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish. Applied Linguistics 311, 532–553.
Stockwell, G.R., & Harrington, M.W.
(2003) The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal, 20(2), 337–359.
(2003) Constructing language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C., & Singer, Y.
(2003) Feature-Rich Part-Of-Speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Human language technology conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 252–259). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: The Association for Computational Linguistics.
2022. Learning an L2 and L3 at the same time: help or hinder?. International Journal of Multilingualism 19:4 ► pp. 566 ff.
2021. Examining lexical features and academic vocabulary use in adolescent L2 students’ text-based analytical essays. Assessing Writing 49 ► pp. 100540 ff.
McCallum, Lee & Philip Durrant
2022. Shaping Writing Grades,
Wu, May Y., Rasmus Steinkrauss & Wander Lowie
2023. The reliability of single task assessment in longitudinal L2 writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing 59 ► pp. 100950 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.