Cover not available
Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 5:2 (2016) ► pp.180–195

Ethical considerations of secondary data use

What about informed consent?

| Radboud Universiteit

In this paper we discuss the ethical aspects of secondary use of language data: data that have been created and stored for purposes such as administration, training or quality monitoring. Such recordings provide interesting natural language data that stay clear of the observer’s paradox (Labov, 1972). Additionally, they offer opportunities for the field of applied linguistics that seeks to understand everyday language use and to assist language users. However, obtaining informed consent from interactants can be extremely difficult if gatekeepers shield them from researchers for reasons of professional ethics or because of legislation. In this article, we draw on our conversation analytic research into police interviews with child witnesses to argue a) that conceptualizing pre-recorded data as archival data is more appropriate than applying the ‘human participants’ ethical model; and b) that if sufficient protective measures are taken, secondary use of data without informed consent can be ethically sound.

Keywords: informed consent, secondary use of data, ethics, applied conversation analysis, discourse, archival research, pre-recorded data, anonymity
Published online: 23 February 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.5.2.06jol
References
Antaki, C
(Ed.) (2011) Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bassett, E.H., & O’Riordan, K
(2002) Ethics of internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(3), 233–249. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogobub, E.B., & Thomas, N
(2005) Parental consent and the ethics of research with foster children. Qualitative Social Work, 4(3), 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cocks, A.J
(2006) The ethical maze: Finding an inclusive path towards gaining children’s agreement to research participation. Childhood, 13(2), 247–266. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
College van Procureurs-Generaal
(2014) Aanwijzing auditief en audiovisueel registreren van verhoren van aangevers, getuigen en verdachten. Den Haag.Google Scholar
Dekens, K., & Van der Sleen, J
(2013) Handleiding het kind als getuige. Amsterdam: Stapel & De Koning.Google Scholar
Council of the European Union
(28 January 2016) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation) [first reading], DATAPROTECT 3, 5455/16.Google Scholar
Fargas-Malet, M., McSherry, D., Larkin, E., & Robinson, C
(2010) Research with children: Methodological issues and innovative techniques. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(2), 175–192. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fogarty, K
(2010) ‘Just say it in your own words’. The social interactional nature of investigative interviews into child sexual abuse. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Gabb, J
(2010) Home truths: Ethical issues in family research. Qualitative Research, 10(4), 461–478. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M
(2013) On the ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis. Qualitative Research, 4(5), 529–541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: A reply to Taylor and Smith. Qualitative Research, 14(6), 763–766. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heath, C., & Luff, P
(2013) Embodied action and organizational activity. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 281–307). Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heydon, G
(2005) The language of police interviewing: A critical analysis. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I
(2007) The discourse of child counseling. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R
(2008) Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Iphofen, R
(2011) Ethical decision making in social research: A practical guide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Labov, W
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Librett, M., & Perrone, D
(2010) Apples and oranges: Ethnography and the IRB. Qualitative Research, 10(6), 729–747. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L
(2013) The conversation analytic approach to data collection. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 32–56). Chichester (etc.): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Munford, R., & Sanders, J
(2004) Recruiting diverse groups of young people to research. Qualitative Social Work, 3(4), 469–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Rapporteur on Human Trafficking and Sexual Violence against children
(2014) On solid ground: Tackling sexual violence against children in the Netherlands. Den Haag: National Rapporteur.Google Scholar
Rossano, F
(2013) Gaze in conversation. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 308–329). Chichester (etc.): Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S
(2011) ‘Going deep’ and ‘giving back’: Strategies for exceeding ethical expectations when research amongst vulnerable youth. Qualitative Research, 11(1), 47–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., & Hamilton, H.E
(2001) Introduction. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H.E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 1–10). Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sieber, J.E., & Tolich, M.B
(2013) Planning ethically responsible research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles etc: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speer, S
(2002a) ‘Natural’ and ‘contrived’ data: A sustainable distinction? Discourse Studies, 4(4), 511–525.Google Scholar
(2002b) Transcending the ‘natural’/’contrived’ distinction: A rejoinder to ten have, Lynch and Potter. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 543–548.Google Scholar
Stefánsson, E., Atladóttir, Ó.Ý., & Guðbjörnsson, B
(2008) Are ethics rules too strict in retrospective clinical studies? Acta Ophthalmologica, 861, 588–590. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stommel, W
(2009) Entering an online support group on eating disorders: A discourse analysis. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stommel, W., & Te Molder, H
(2015) Counselling online and over the phone: When pre-closing questions fail as a closing device. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 48(3), 281–300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taylor, S., & Smith, R
(2013) The ethics of interviewing for discourse analysis: Responses to Martyn Hammersley. Qualitative Research, 0(0), 1–7.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P
(2007) Doing conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Los Angeles etc: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vainio, A
(2012) Beyond research ethics: Anonymity as ‘ontology’, ‘analysis’ and ‘independence’. Qualitative Research, 13(6), 685–698. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wiles, R., Heath, S., Crow, G., & Charles, V
(2005) Informed consent in social research: A literature review. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, NCRM Methods Review Papers.Google Scholar
Williams, B
(2006) Meaningful consent to participate in social research on the part of people under the age of eighteen. Research Ethics Review, 2(1), 19–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1947
Nuremberg Code, Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10 Vol. II. Nuremberg. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 181–182, Retrieved on, 14 April 2016, from [URL].Google Scholar
1979
Belmont Rapport. The national commission for the protection of human subjects of biomedical and behavioral research. Retrieved on, 14 July 2014, from [URL].
American Anthropological Association (AAA)
(1998/2009) Code of ethics of the American Anthropological Association. Retrieved on 19 November 2014, from [URL].
American Psychological Association (APA)
(2002/2010) Ethical principles and code of conduct. Including 2010 amendments. Retrieved on 20 April 2016, from [URL].
American Sociological Association (ASA)
(1999/2008) Code of conduct Policies and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. Retrieved on 15 July 2014, from [URL].
Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR)
(2012) Ethical decision-making and internet research. Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee (version 2.0). Retrieved on 14 May 2014, from [URL].
Nederlandse biomedische onderzoeksgemeenschap/Federatie van Medisch Wetenschappelijke Verenigingen (FMWV)
(2003/2004) Gedragscode Gezondheidsonderzoek. Retrieved on 19 November 2014, from [URL].
RESPECT Code of Practice for Socio-Economic Research
(2004) Retrieved on 20 April 2016, from [URL].
Social Research Association (SRA)
(December 2003) Ethical guidelines. Retrieved on 20 April 2017, from [URL].
World Medical Association
(1964/2008) Declaration of Helsinki on ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Retrieved on 14 July 2014, from [URL].
Cited by

Cited by 5 other publications

Jol, Guusje & Wyke Stommel
2021. The Interactional Costs of “Neutrality” in Police Interviews with Child Witnesses. Research on Language and Social Interaction 54:3 ► pp. 299 ff. DOI logo
Jol, Guusje & Wyke Stommel
2023. Practicing ground rules in police interviews with child witnesses. Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Jol, Guusje, Wyke Stommel & Wilbert Spooren
2019. Misleading the Alleged Offender: Child Witnesses’ Displays of Competence in Police Interviews. In Children and Mental Health Talk, ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Maraveas, Chrysanthos, Ioannis Vasileios Kyrtopoulos, Konstantinos G. Arvanitis & Thomas Bartzanas
2024. The Aging of Polymers under Electromagnetic Radiation. Polymers 16:5 ► pp. 689 ff. DOI logo
Quansah, Frank
2022. Item and rater variabilities in students’ evaluation of teaching in a university in Ghana: application of Many-Facet Rasch Model. Heliyon 8:12 ► pp. e12548 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.