Cover not available
Article published In:
Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics
Vol. 6:1 (2017) ► pp.100–118

Local and global pitch perception in L1 and L2 readers of Dutch

| Tilburg University
| Tilburg University
| Tilburg University
| Tilburg University
| Tilburg University
| Hogeschool Rotterdam
Prior research showed a relationship between reading skills and pitch perception, however the exact nature remained unclear. By means of reading tests and a pitch perception test, we examined the relation between reading abilities and local and global pitch perception for 92 native Dutch children (mean age = 9.47) and 61 non-native Dutch children (mean age = 9.61). Additionally, for the latter group we examined the role of working memory. In line with prior research with poor readers in a language with a rather transparent orthography by Ziegler, Pech-Georgel, George and Foxton (2012), a relationship is found between reading skills and the ability to detect local changes in pitch, rather than global changes in the melody. Additionally, at least for beginning readers of Dutch as a second language, there is a strong effect of working memory on the relation between reading skills and pitch perception.
Keywords: auditory perception, Dutch, phonological decoding, pitch perception, reading skills, second language learning, working memory
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Current study
    • 2.1Experiment 1
      • 2.1.1Method
        • Participants
        • Design and instrumentation
        • Reading skills
        • Pitch Perception Task
        • Procedure and materials
        • Data analysis
      • 2.1.2Results
      • 2.1.3Conclusion
    • 2.2Experiment 2
      • 2.2.1Method
        • Participants
        • Design and instrumentation
          • Digit Span Task
        • Procedure and material
        • Data analysis
      • 2.2.2Results
      • 2.2.3Conclusion
  • 3.General conclusion and discussion
  • Notes
  • References


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 26 October 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/dujal.6.1.06dej
References
Abbadi, M., Di Giacomo, F., Cortesi, A., Spronck, P., Constantini, G., & Maggiore, G.
(2015) Casanova: A simple, high-performance language for game development. In S. Göbel, M. Ma, J. Baalsrud Hauge, M. Oliveira, J. Wiemeyer, & V. Wendel (Eds.), JCSG 2015, LNCS 9090 (pp. 123–134). Bern: Springer.Google Scholar
Baddeley, A.
(2003) Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boets, B., Vandermosten, M., Poelmans, H., Luts, H., Wouters, J., & Ghesquière, P.
(2011) Preschool impairments in auditory processing and speech perception uniquely predict future reading problems. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 560–570. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruck, M., Genesee, F., & Caravolas, M.
(1997) A cross-linguistic study of early literacy acquisition. In B. A. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 145–162). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Brus, B. T., & Voeten, M. J. M.
(1980) Eén-Minuut-Test (EMT): Vorm A en B. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.Google Scholar
Chiappe, P., Siegel, L. S., & Wade-Woolley, L.
(2002) Linguistic diversity and the development of reading skills: A longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 6(4), 369–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Jong, C., Postma-Nilsenová, M., & Mos, M. B. J.
(2017) Reading skills and pitch perception in Dutch high-school students. In Proceedings of the 14th International Congress for the Study of Child Language, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
De Jong, P. F., & Van der Leij, A.
(1999) Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Foxton, J. M., Talcott, J. B., Witton, C., Brace, H., McIntyre, F., & Griffiths, T. D.
(2003) Reading skills are related to global, but not local, acoustic pattern perception. Nature Neuroscience, 6(4), 343–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U.
(2013) Dyslexia – in tune but out of time. Psychologist, 26(2), 106–109.Google Scholar
Goswami, U., Gobert, J. E., & de Barrera, L. C.
(1998) Children’s orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 191, 19–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U., Mead, N., Fosker, T., Huss, M., Barnes, L., & Leong, V.
(2013) Impaired perception of syllable stress in children with dyslexia: A longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grube, M., Cooper, F. E., Kumar, S., Kelly, T., & Griffiths, T. D.
(2014) Exploring the role of auditory analysis in atypical compared to typical language development. Hearing Research, 3081, 129–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirahara, T., & Kato, H.
(1992) The effect of F0 on vowel identification. In Y. Tohkura, E. Vatikiotis-Bateson, & Y. Sagisaka (Eds.), Speech perception, production and linguistic structure (pp. 89–112). Tokyo: Ohmsha.Google Scholar
Keating, P.
(2005) D-prime (signal detection) analysis. Retrieved from [URL]
Louie, P., Kroog, K., Zuk, J., Winner, E., & Schlaug, G.
(2011) Relating pitch awareness to phonemic awareness in children: Implications for tone-deafness and dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 21, 58–62.Google Scholar
Lundberg, I.
(2002) Second language learning and reading with the additional load of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 52(1), 165–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olsthoorn, N. M., Andringa, S., & Hulstijn, J. H.
(2014) Visual and auditory digit-span performance in native and non-native speakers. International Journal of Bilingualism, 18(6), 663–673. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Patel, A. D., Wong, M., Foxton, J., Lochy, A., & Peretz, I.
(2008) Speech intonation perception deficits in musical tone deafness (congenital amusia). Music Perception, 251, 357–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pfordresher, P. Q., & Brown, S.
(2009) Enhanced production and perception of musical pitch in tone language speakers. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71 (6), 1385–1398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M.
(2003) Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94(2), 143–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, L. S.
(1993) The development of reading. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 24(2), 63–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Snowling, M. J.
(2001) Developmental dyslexia. Current Paediatrics, 11(1), 10–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., & Serniclaes, W.
(2013) Reading acquisition and developmental dyslexia. Hove: Psychology Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stahl, S. A., & Murray, B. A.
(1994) Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 221–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swanson, H. L., & Ashbaker, M. H.
(2000) Working memory, short-term memory, speech rate, word recognition and reading comprehension in learning disabled readers: Does the executive system have a role? Intelligence, 28(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P.
(1980) Auditory temporal perception, phonics, and reading disabilities in children. Brain and Language, 9(2), 182–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tallal, P., & Piercy, M.
(1974) Developmental aphasia: Rate of auditory processing and selective impairment of consonant perception. Neuropsychologia, 12 (1), 83–93. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thomson, J. M., Leong, V., & Goswami, U.
(2013) Auditory processing interventions and developmental dyslexia: A comparison of phonemic and rhythmic approaches. Reading and Writing, 26(2), 139–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turner, P. G., & Verhoeven, J.
(2011) Intrinsic vowel pitch: A gradient feature of vowel systems. Paper presented at the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 17–21 August, 2011, Hong Kong.
Van Den Bos, K. P., Lutje Spelberg, H. C., Scheepstra, A. J. M., & De Vries, J. R.
(2010) De klepel: Vorm A en B. Een test voor de leesvaardigheid van pseudowoorden: verantwoording, handleiding, diagnostiek en behandeling. Amsterdamnds: Pearson.Google Scholar
Wang, S., & Gathercole, S. E.
(2013) Working memory deficits in children with reading difficulties: Memory span and dual task coordination. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115(1), 188–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, D. H., & Levitt, A. G.
(1995) The universality of intrinsic F0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 231, 349–366. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalley, K., & Hansen, J.
(2006) The role of prosodic sensitivity in children’s reading development. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(3), 288–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williamson, V. J., Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J.
(2010) Musicians’ and nonmusicians’ short-term memory for verbal and musical sequences: Comparing phonological similarity and pitch proximity. Memory & Cognition, 38(2), 163–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Witton, C., Talcott, J. B., Hansen, P. C., Richardson, A. J., Griffiths, T. D., Rees, A., Stein, J. F., & Green, G. G. R.
(1998) Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers. Current Biology, 81, 791–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., & Goswami, U.
(2005) Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory. Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 3–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C. & Goswami, U.
(2006) Becoming literate in different languages: similar problems, different solutions. Developmental Science, 9(5), 429–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ziegler, J. C., Pech-Georgel, C., George, F., & Foxton, J. M.
(2012) Global and local pitch perception in children with developmental dyslexia. Brain and language, 120(3), 265–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar