Book review
Johan De Smedt & Helen De Cruz. The Challenge of Evolution to Religion. Cambridge, New York, Port Melbourne, New Delhi, Singapore: Cambridge University Press, 2020. . [Cambridge Elements: Philosophy of Biology]. 78 pp.
References (19)
References
Boyer, P. (2002). Religion
explained. The evolutionary origins of religious
thought. London: Vintage![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Foley, R. (1995). Humans
before humanity. An evolutionary
perspective. Oxford: Blackwell![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2017). The
subject as cause and effect of evolution. Interface
Focus, 71, 20170022. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gould, S. J. (1989). Wonderful
life. The Burgess Shale and the nature of
history. London: Penguin![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces
in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York: Oxford University Press![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haeckel, E. (1886). The
evolution of man. A popular exposition of the principal points of human ontogeny and
phylogeny. New York: D. Appleton and Company![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jonas, H. (1987). The
Concept of God after Auschwitz: A Jewish Voice. Journal of
Religion, 67 (1), 1–13. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kauffman, S. (2008). Reinventing
the sacred. A new view of science, reason, and religion. New York: Basic Books![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kelemen, D., J. Rottman, & R. Seston. (2013). Professional
physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive
default. Journal of experimental psychology:
General, 1421, 1074–1083. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuhn, S. (2014). Signaling
theory and technology of communication in the Palaeolithic. Biological
Theory 91, 42–50. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, M. (1991). Narratives
of Human Evolution. New Haven Ct: Yale University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leibowitz, Y. (1992). Judaism,
human values, and the Jewish state (E. Goldman, ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Monod, J. (1970). Le
Hasard et la Nécessité. Essai sur la philosophie naturelle de la biologie
moderne. Paris. Éditions du Seuil![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Okasha, S. (2018). Agents
and goals in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Plantinga, A. (2011). Where the conflict really lies. Science, religion, and naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ritchie, S. L. (2017). Dancing
around the causal joint: Challenging the theological turn in divine action theories. Zygon:
Journal of Religion and
Science, 521, 361–379. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tennant, F. R. (1902). The
Origin and Propagation of Sin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uexküll, J. von. (1926). Theoretical
Biology. New York, London: Harcourt, Brace & Co., Kegan, Trench, Trubner & Co![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ward, K. (1999). God,
chance, and
necessity. Oxford: Oneworld![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)