Article published In:
Evolutionary Linguistic TheoryVol. 5:2 (2023) ► pp.162–193
Reconsidering linguistic nativism from an interdisciplinary, emergentist perspective
For decades, interdisciplinary research efforts have accumulated insights that diminish the significance of the classic nature versus nurture dichotomy, instead calling for a nuanced, multifactorial approach to ontogeny. Similarly, the role of genes in both phylogeny and ontogeny, once seen as rather deterministic, is now conceptualized as highly dependent on environmental factors, including behavior. Linguistic theories have, in principle, made an effort to incorporate these changing views. However, the central claim of the given paper is that this apparent compliance with biological insights remains superficial. As such, considerable disconnects between linguistic theory and what is known about the biological underpinnings of complex traits persist, negatively impacting pertinent views on language acquisition, language universals and the evolution of language. Given the breadth of these fields of study, the aim of this paper is to tackle the root of the problem: It begins by sketching out linguistic nativism as conceptualized within generativism, pointing to aspects within this position that stand in conflict with the interdisciplinary literature. It will then review select areas of research in a succinct manner in order to substantiate the criticism and characterize the counterposition as found within the biological sciences. The paper will culminate in addressing these disconnects on conceptual grounds, i.e. invoking the term emergence as employed in neuroscience as a possible means to reconcile those biological insights with linguistic nativism.
Keywords: nativism, universal grammar, linguistic theory, biolinguistics, generative grammar, construction grammar
Article outline
- 1.On conceptual idealization and false dichotomies
- 2.Chomsky’s position(s) on language evolution and the language faculty
- 3.Of kittens and the ontogeny of vision
- 4.Of dietary products and the role of genetic changes
- 5.Defending nativism despite these criticisms, part 1: The pattern of language acquisition
- 6.Defending nativism despite these criticisms, part 2: Critical periods and L2 acquisition
- 7.Defending nativism despite these criticisms, part 3: The modularity of language
- 8.Updating linguistic nativism: Emergence as a bridging concept
- 9.Weak theoretical approaches are not weak
- Competing interests statement
-
References
References (91)
Bergelson, E., Casillas, M., Soderstrom, M., Seidl, A., Warlaumont, A. S., & Amatuni, A.
(2019) What
do North American babies hear? A large-scale cross-corpus analysis. Developmental
Science,
22
(1), article
e127224. 
Berwick, R. C.
(2011) All
you need is Merge: Biology, computation, and language from the
bottom-up. In A. M. di Sciullo & C. Boeckx, The
Biolinguistic Enterprise: New Perspectives on the Evolution and Nature of the Human Language
Faculty, 461–491. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berwick, R. C., & Chomsky, N.
(2016) Why Only Us: Language and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
(2017) Why
only us: recent questions and answers. Journal of
Neurolinguistics,
43
1, 166–177.
Blakemore, C., & Cooper, G. F.
(1970) Development
of the brain depends on the visual
environment. Nature,
228
(5270), 477–478.
Brauer, J., Anwander, A., Perani, D., & Friederici, A. D.
(2013) Dorsal
and ventral pathways in language development. Brain and
Language,
127
(2), 289–295.
Brentari, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S.
(2017) Language
emergence. Annual Review of
Linguistics,
3
1, 363–388.
Breyl, M.
(2021) Triangulating
Neanderthal cognition: A tale of not seeing the forest for the tress. WIRES Cognitive
Science,
12
(2), article
e1545.
(2023) The
linguist’s guide to human fallibility and biases: Their evolution, cognitive significance and impact in decision
making. Linguistische Treffen in
Wrocław,
23
(1), 17–37.
Carmody, R. N., Weintraub, G. S., & Wrangham, R. W.
(2011) Energetic
consequences of thermal and nonthermal food processing. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of
America,
108
(48), 19199–19203.
Casillas, M., Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C.
(2019) Early
language experience in a Tseltal Mayan village. Child
Development,
91
(5), 1819–1835.
Casillas, M., Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C.
(2020) Early
language experience in a Papuan community. Journal of Child
Language,
48
(4), 792–814.
Chomsky, N.
(1976a) Reflections
on
Language. London: Fontana.
(1976b) On
the nature of language. In S. Harnad, H. D. Steklis & J. Lancaster (eds.), Origins
and Evolution of Language and Speech, 46–57. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
(1991) Linguistics
and cognitive science: Problems and mysteries. In Asa Kasher (ed.), The
Chomskyan Turn: Generative Linguistics, Philosophy, Mathematics, and
Psychology, 26–55. Oxford: Blackwell.
(2002) On
Nature and Language (A. Belletti & L. Rizzi, eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cowley, S. J.
(2001) The
baby, the bathwater and the “language instinct” debate. Language
Sciences,
23
(1), 69–91.
Dąbrowska, E.
(2015) What
exactly is Universal Grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in
Psychology,
6
1, article 852.
Dapschauskas, R., Göden, M. B., Sommer, C. & Kandel, A. W.
(2022) The
emergence of habitual ochre use in Africa and its significance for the development of ritual behavior during the middle stone
age. Journal of World
Prehistory,
35
1, 233–319.
de Boer, B., Thompson, B., Ragignani, A., & Boeckx, C.
(2020) Evolutionary
dynamics do not motivate a single-mutant theory of human language. Scientific
Reports,
10
1, article 451.
Deacon, T.
(1997) The
Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Human
Brain. London: Penguin Press.
Dediu, D.
(2021) Tone
and genes: new cross-linguistic data and methods support the weak negative effect of the “derived” allele
ASPM on tone, but not of Microcephalin
. PLOS
ONE,
16
(6), article
e0253546.
Dediu, D., & Ladd, D. R.
(2007) Linguistic
tone is related to the population frequency of the adaptive haplogroups of two brain size genes, ASPM and
Microcephalin
. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of
America,
104
(26), 10944–10949.
Dediu, D., & Levinson, S. C.
(2013) On
the antiquity of language: The reinterpretation of Neandertal linguistic capacities and its
consequences. Frontiers in
Psychology,
4
1, article 397.
(2018) Neanderthal
language revisited: Not only us. Current Opinion in Behavioral
Sciences,
21
1, 49–55.
Dékány, É.
(2019) Foundations
of generative linguistics. Acta Linguistica
Academia,
66
(3), 309–334.
Enard, W., Przeworski, M., Fischer, S. E., Lai, C. S. L., Wiebe, V., … Pääbo, S.
(2002) Molecular
evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and
language. Nature,
418
(6900), 869–872.
Fitch, W. T.
(2014) Toward
a computational framework for cognitive biology: Unifying approaches from cognitive neuroscience and comparative
cognition. Physics of Life
Reviews,
11
1, 329–364.
Fitch, W. T., Hauser, M. D. & Chomsky, N.
(2005) The
evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and
implications. Cognition,
97
(2), 179–210.
Garcia, J., Kimeldorf, D. J., & Koelling, R. A.
(1955) Conditioned
aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma
radiation. Science,
122
(3160), 157–158.
Garcia, J., & Koelling, R. A.
(1966) Relation
of cue to consequence in avoidance learning. Psychonomic
Science,
4
(3), 123–124.
Goaillard, J.-M. & Marder, E.
(2021) Ion
channel degeneracy, variability, and covariation in neuron and circuit resilience. Annual
Review of
Neuroscience,
44
1, 335–357.
Goldberg, A. E.
(2006) Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
(2019) Explain Me This: Creativity, Competition and the Partial Productivity of Constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gopnik, M.
(1990a) Feature-blind
grammar and
dysphasia. Nature,
344
(6268), 715.
(1990b) Genetic
basis of grammar
defect. Nature,
347
(6288), 26.
Gopnik, M., & Crago, M. B.
(1991) Familial
aggregation of a developmental language
disorder. Cognition,
39
1, 1–50.
Gowlett, J. A. J.
(2016) The
discovery of fire by humans: A long and convoluted process. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B,
371
1, article
20150164.
Hartshorne, J. K., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Pinker, S.
(2018) A
critical period for second language acquisition: Evidence from 2/3 million English
speakers. Cognition,
177
1, 263–277.
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T.
(2002) The
faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it
evolve? Science,
298
(5598), 1569–1579.
Hopper, P. J.
(1998) Emergent
grammar. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The
New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language
Strucutre, 155–175. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hubel, D. H.
(1995) Eye,
Brain, and Vision. New York & Oxford: Scientific American Library.
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N.
(1959) Receptive
fields of single neurons in the cat’s striate cortex. The Journal of
Physiology,
148
(3), 574–591.
(1970) The
period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens. The
Journal of
Physiology,
206
(2), 419–436.
Hurst, J. A., Baraitser, M., Auger, E., Graham, F., & Norell, S.
(1990) An
extended family with a dominantly inherited speech disorder. Developmental Medicine and Child
Neurology,
32
(4), 352–355.
Itan, Y., Powell, A., Beaumont, M. A., Burger, J., & Thomas, M. G.
(2009) The
origins of lactase persistence in Europe. PLOS Computational
Biology,
5
(8), article
e1000491.
Jacob, F.
(1977) Evolution
and
tinkering. Science,
196
(4295), 1161–1166.
Kissine, M.
(2021) Autism,
constructionism and
nativism. Language,
97
(3), e139–e160.
Kissine, M., Luffin, X., Aiad, F., Bourourou, R., Deliens, G., & Gaddour, N.
(2019) Noncolloquial
Arabic in Tunisian children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A possible instance of language acquisition in a noninteractive
context. Language
Learning,
69
(1), 44–70.
Krause, J., Lalueza-Fox, C., Orlando, L., Enard, W., Green, R. E., Burbano, H. A., … Pääbo, S.
(2007) The
derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals. Current
Biology,
17
(21), 1908–1912.
Kuhl, P. K.
(2007) Is
speech learning ‘gates’ by the social brain? Developmental
Science,
10
(1), 110–120.
(2010) Brain
mechanisms in early language
acquisition. Neuron,
67
(5), 713–727.
Kuhl, P. K., Stevens, E., Hayashi, A., Deguchi, T., Kiritani, S., & Iverson, P.
(2006) Infants
show a facilitation effect for native language phonetic perception between 6 and 12
months. Developmental
Science,
9
(2), 13–21.
Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F.-M., & Liu, H.-M.
(2003) Foreign-language
experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic
learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America,
100
(15), 9096–9101.
Lai, C. S. L., Fischer, S. E., Hurst, J. A., Vargha-Kadem, F., & Monaco, A. P.
(2001) A
forkhead-domain gene is mutated in a severe speech and language
disorder. Nature,
413
(6855), 519–523.
Laland, K. N.
(2008) Exploring
gene – culture interactions: Insights from handedness, sexual selection and niche-construction case
studies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
B,
363
(1509), 3577–3589.
Levinson, S. C., & Dediu, D.
(2013) The
interplay of genetic and cultural factors in ongoing language
evolution. In P. J. Richerson & M. H. Christiansen (eds.), Cultural
evolution. Society, technology, language, and
religion, 219–232. Cambride, MA: MIT Press.
Lidz, J. & Gagliardi, A.
(2015) How
nature meets nurture: Universal grammar and statistical learning. Annual Review of
Linguistics
1
1, 333–2353.
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. H.
(1988) Segregation
of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and
perception. Science,
240
(4853), 740–749.
MacWhinney, B.
(1998) Models
of the emergence of language. Annual Review of
Psychology,
49
(1), 199–227.
Malmström, H., Linderholm, A., Lidén, K., Storå, J., Molnar, P., Holmund, G., Jakobsson, M., & Götherström, A.
(2010) High
frequency of lactose intolerance in a prehistoric hunter-gatherer population in northern
Europe. BMC Evolutionary
Biology,
10
1, article 89.
Mameli, M., & Bateson, P.
(2011) An
evaluation of the concept of innateness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
B,
366
(1563), 436–443.
Martins, P. T., & Boeckx, C.
(2019) Language
evolution and complexity considerations: The no half-Merge fallacy. PLOS
Biology,
17
(11), Article
e3000389.
Mayberry, R. I., Lock, E., & Kazmi, H.
(2002) Linguistic
ability and early language
exposure. Nature,
417
(6884), 38.
McNally, R. J.
(2016) The
legacy of Seligman’s “Phobias and Preparedness” (1971). Behavior
Therapy,
47
1, 585–594.
Newport, E. L.
(1990) Maturational
constraints on language learning. Cognitive
Science,
14
(1), 11–28.
O’Grady, W.
(2008) The
emergentist
program. Lingua,
118
1, 447–464.
Öhman, A., & Menika, S.
(2001) Fears,
phobias and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological
Review,
108
(3), 483–522.
Paixáo-Côrtez, V. R., Vicardi, L. H., Salzano, F. M., Hunemeier, T., & Bortolini, M. C.
(2012)
Homo
sapiens, Homo neanderthalensis and the Denisova specimen: New insights on their evolutionary histories using
whole-genome comparisons. Genetics and Molecular
Biology,
35
(4), 904–911.
Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Näätänen, R., Liitola, A., Sambeth, A., & Huotilainen, M.
(2013) Learning-induced
neural plasticity of speech processing before birth. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of
America,
110
(37), 15145–15150.
Pinker, S.
(1991) Rules
of
language. Science,
253
(5019), 530–535.
(1994) The
Language Instinct: The New Science of Language and
Mind. London: Penguin Books.
Pinker, S. & Bloom, P.
(1990) Natural
language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain
Sciences,
13
1, 707–784.
Pinker, S. & R. Jackendoff
(2005) The
faculty of language: What’s special about
it? Cognition,
95
1, 201–236.
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T.
(2002) The
past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
6
(11), 456–463.
Pleyer, M., & Hartmann, S.
(2019) Constructing
a consensus on language evolution? Convergences and differences between biolinguistics and usage-based
approaches. Frontiers in
Psychology,
10
1, article 2537.
Ramonda, K.
(2014) Goldberg’s
construction grammar. In J. Littlemore & R. R. Taylor (eds.), The
Bloomsbury companion to cognitive
linguistics, 60–71. London & New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Reich, D., Green, R. E., Kirchner, M., Krause, J., Patterson, N., Durand, E. Y., … Pääbo, S.
(2010) Genetic
history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova Cave in
Siberia. Nature,
468
(7327), 1053–1060.
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R.
(2010) Why
possibly language
evolved. Biolinguistics
4
1, 289–306.
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L.
(1996) Statistical
learning by 8-month-old
infants. Science,
274
(5294), 1926–1928.
Sapolsky, R.
(2017) Behave.
The Biology of Humans at Our Best and
Worst. London: Penguin Books.
Seligman, M. E.
(1970) On
the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological
Review,
77
(5), 406–418.
(1971) Phobias
and preparedness. Behavior
Therapy,
2
(3), 307–320.
Simoons, F. J.
(1969) Primary
adult lactose intolerance and the milking habit: A problem in biologic and cultural interrelations: I. Review of the medical
research. The American Journal of Digestive
Diseases,
14
(12), 819–836.
(1970) Primary
adult lactose intolerance and the milking habit: a problem in biologic and cultural interrelations: II. A culture historical
hypothesis. The American Journal of Digestive
Diseases,
15
(8), 695–710.
Stahl, B., & Van Lancker Sidtis, D.
(2015) Tapping
into neural resources o communication: Formulaic language in aphasia therapy. Frontiers in
Psychology,
8
1, article 1526.
Thagart, P. & Stewart, T. C.
(2014) Two
theories of consciousness: Semantic pointer competition vs. information
integration. Consciousness and
Cognition,
30
1, 73–90.
Vyshedskiy, A., Mahapatra, S., & Dunn, R.
(2017) Linguistically
deprived children: Meta-analysis of published research underlines the importance of early syntactic language use for normal
brain development. Research Ideas and
Outcomes,
3
1, article e20696.
Wilson, P. D., & Riesen, A. H.
(1966) Visual
development in rhesus monkeys neonatally deprived of patterned light. Journal of Comparative
and Physiological
Psychology,
61
(1), 87–95.
Wong, P. C. M., Chandrasekaran, B., & Zheng, J.
(2012) The
derived allele of ASPM is associated with lexical tone perception. PLOS
ONE,
7
(4), article
e34243.
Wong, P. C. M., Kang, X., Wong, K. H. Y., So, H.-C., Choy, K. W., & Geng, X.
(2020)
ASPM-lexical
tone association in speakers of a tone language: direct evidence for the genetic-biasing hypothesis of language
evolution. Science
Advances,
6
(22), article
1824.