Article published In:
Evolution of CommunicationVol. 4:2 (2001) ► pp.253–296
Meaning = Life (+ Culture)
An outline of a unified biocultural theory of meaning
The article presents the outlines of an integrative theory of meaning based on the concept of value, understood both as a biological and as a socio-cultural category, synthesizing ideas from evolutionary and developmental psychology, semiotics and cybernetics. The proposal distinguishes between four types of meaning systems, cue-based, associational, mimetic and symbolic, forming an evolutionary and epigenetic hierarchy. The theory is applied to phylogenetic and human ontogenetic development, pointing out significant parallels between the two processes, involving both continuity and discontinuity between the different levels. Since one of the basic tenets of the theory is that only living systems have intrinsic value, which is a necessary and sufficient condition for possessing the category meaning, negative implications are drawn for the meaning potential of (current) artificial systems.
Keywords: conventions, epigenesis, language, meaning, mimesis, robots, signs, value
Cited by
Cited by 30 other publications
Froese, Tom & Ezequiel A. Di Paolo
2009. Sociality and the life–mind continuity thesis. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 8:4 ► pp. 439 ff. 
Fuchs, Thomas
2022. Understanding Sophia? On human interaction with artificial agents. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
Jones, Phil
2009. Therapists’ understandings of embodiment in dramatherapy: Findings from a research approach using vignettes and aMSN messenger research conversations. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 4:2 ► pp. 95 ff.
Kitova, Elena & Anastasia Melgunova
2019. The Reflection of the Social Value Hierarchy in the Concepts of Data Protection and Freedom of Information. Theoretical and Practical Issues of Journalism 8:2 ► pp. 330 ff.
Kravchenko, Alexander
2006. Cognitive linguistics, biology of cognition and biosemiotics: Bridging the gaps. Language Sciences 28:1 ► pp. 51 ff.
Kravchenko, Alexander V.
2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences 29:5 ► pp. 650 ff.
2010. Native speakers, mother tongues and other objects of wonder. Language Sciences 32:6 ► pp. 677 ff.
Lou, Vivian W.Q.
2011. Depressive symptoms of older adults in Hong Kong: the role of grandparent reward. International Journal of Social Welfare 20:s1
Makarova, Elena A.
2020. Views on environment in biocognitive studies of language (Linguo-philosophical analysis). Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics :4(2020) ► pp. 116 ff.
Maksimov, N. V. & O. L. Golitsyna
2022. From Semantic to Cognitive Information Search: The Fundamental Principles and Models of Deep Semantic Search. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 145 ff.
Marchetti, Giorgio
2018. Consciousness: a unique way of processing information. Cognitive Processing 19:3 ► pp. 435 ff.
Mendoza-Collazos, Juan & Jordan Zlatev
2022. A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Agency: Assessing Ideas from Cognitive Science and Neuroscience. Biosemiotics 15:1 ► pp. 141 ff.
Mendoza-Collazos, Juan Carlos
2021. Responsibility of Action and Situated Cognition in Artefact—User Relationship. In Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021) [Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 219], ► pp. 211 ff.
Parthemore, Joel
2013. The Unified Conceptual Space Theory: an enactive theory of concepts. Adaptive Behavior 21:3 ► pp. 168 ff.
2017. Consciousness, semiosis, and the unbinding problem. Language & Communication 54 ► pp. 36 ff.
2019. On the Essentially Dynamic Nature of Concepts: Constant if Incremental Motion in Conceptual Spaces. In Conceptual Spaces: Elaborations and Applications [Synthese Library, 405], ► pp. 83 ff.
Parthemore, Joel & Blay Whitby
2014. Moral Agency, Moral Responsibility, and Artifacts: What Existing Artifacts Fail to Achieve (and Why), and Why They, Nevertheless, Can (and Do!) Make Moral Claims upon Us. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 06:02 ► pp. 141 ff.
Pushkarev, Evgeny A. & Julia S. Rastvorova
2022. States of idiosyncratic idealized cognitive models in acts of pragmatic meaning. Language Sciences 93 ► pp. 101498 ff.
Ribó, Ignasi
2019. Semiotic alignment: Towards a dialogical model of interspecific communication
. Semiotica 2019:230 ► pp. 247 ff.
Smirnova, Alexandra Yu.
2016. “Where is the bank?” or how to “find” different senses of a word. Heliyon 2:6 ► pp. e00065 ff.
Sonesson, Göran
2011. Semiotics Inside-Out and/or Outside-In. How to Understand Everything and (with Luck) Influence People. Signata :2 ► pp. 315 ff.
Zhulina, Yekaterina B.
2016. The Present Progressive Passive Tense. Cognitive Examinatio. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates 2:3 ► pp. 40 ff.
Ziemke, Tom
2004. Embodied AI as Science: Models of Embodied Cognition, Embodied Models of Cognition, or Both?. In Embodied Artificial Intelligence [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3139], ► pp. 27 ff.
2005. Cybernetics and embodied cognition: on the construction of realities in organisms and robots. Kybernetes 34:1/2 ► pp. 118 ff.
2016. The body of knowledge: On the role of the living body in grounding embodied cognition. Biosystems 148 ► pp. 4 ff.
Zlatev, Jordan
2008. From proto-mimesis to language: Evidence from primatology and social neuroscience. Journal of Physiology-Paris 102:1-3 ► pp. 137 ff.
2015. Cognitive Semiotics. In International Handbook of Semiotics, ► pp. 1043 ff.
Zlatev, Jordan, Przemysław Żywiczyński & Sławomir Wacewicz
2020. Pantomime as the original human-specific communicative system. Journal of Language Evolution 5:2 ► pp. 156 ff.
Zlatev, Jordon
2006. Book review. Connection Science 18:3 ► pp. 303 ff.
[no author supplied]
2005. Book review. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 17:3 ► pp. 441 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 march 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.