Cover not available
Article published In:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 10–37

Measuring emotional temperatures in Shakespeare’s drama

| Lancaster University
| Lancaster University
| Lancaster University
| University of Wolverhampton
This paper demonstrates how the computational analysis of Shakespeare’s plays can map the emotional language used across individual plays and across the canon more broadly, affording new insights. It explains how we adapted the “sentiment analysis” tool SentiStrength for use with Early Modern English. Our analyses allow us to test out the long-held critical hypothesis that Shakespeare’s work moved from a comic to a “problem” and tragic period, and thence to a more optimistic redemptive mood in his last plays. The paper will also suggest how computational techniques can further understanding of genre, in particular the relationship between history and tragedy in Shakespeare’s work.
Keywords: computational linguistics, drama, emotion, sentiment, Shakespeare
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Emotion in language and literature
    • 2.1Emotion, language and computers
    • 2.2Emotion, literature and Shakespeare
  • 3.The computational analysis of emotion: SentiStrength and Early Modern English
    • 3.1The data for our study and its preparation: Shakespearean English
    • 3.2Sentiment strength detection with SentiStrength
    • 3.3Adapting SentiStrength to Early Modern English: The lexicon
    • 3.4Initial testing of SentiStrength on Shakespearean English
  • 4.Emotional temperature across the canon
    • 4.1Intensity of emotion
    • 4.2Degree of negative emotion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Note
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 27 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00002.cul
References (43)
References
Bayley, Lewis. 1613. The Practise of Pietie directing a Christian how to walke that he may please God.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika. 2008. Emotion Talk across Corpora. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, A. C. [1905] 1960. Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on Hamlet, Othello, King Lear, Macbeth. 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Caffi, Claudia & Richard W. Janney. 1994. Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication. Journal of Pragmatics 22 (3): 325–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clough, Patricia Ticineto & Jean Halley (eds). 2007. The Affective Turn: Theorizing the Social. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demmen, Jane E. 2009. Charmed and chattering tongues: Investigating the functions and effects of keyword clusters in the dialogue of Shakespeare’s female characters. MA dissertation, Lancaster University. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 8 June 2018).
Dowden, Edward. 1875. Shakspere: A Critical Study of His Mind and Art. London: Henry S. King and Company.Google Scholar
. 1877. Shakspere: A Primer. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Evans, Dylan. 2001. Emotion: The Science of Sentiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen, Walter Cohen, Suzanne Gossett, Jean E. Howard, Katharine Wisaman Maus & Gordon McMullan (eds). 2015. The Norton Shakespeare. Third edn. New York and London: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 350–377.Google Scholar
Knights, L. C. 1933. How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?: an essay in the theory and practice of Shakespeare Criticism. Cambridge: Gordon Fraser.Google Scholar
Kyd, Thomas. 1592. The Spanish tragedie containing the lamentable end of Don Horatio, and Bel-imperia: with the pittifull death of olde Hieronimo. London: Edward Allde, for Edward White.Google Scholar
Linley, Keith. 2015. King Lear in Context: The Cultural Background. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Matt, Susan. 2011. Current emotion research in history: Or, doing history from the inside out. Emotion Review 31: 117–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meek, Richard. 2012. Introduction: Shakespeare and the culture of emotion. Shakespeare 8 (3): 279–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. “Rue e’en for ruth”: Richard II and the imitation of sympathy. In The Renaissance of Emotion: Understanding Affect in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, Richard Meek & Erin Sullivan (eds). Manchester: Manchester University Press, 130–152.Google Scholar
Meek, Richard & Erin Sullivan (eds). 2015. The Renaissance of Emotion: Understanding Affect in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries. Manchester: Manchester University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meres, Francis. 1598. Palladis tamia. Wits treasury being the second part of Wits common wealth. London: P. Short, for Cuthbert Burbie.Google Scholar
Mullaney, Steven. 2015. The Reformation of Emotions in the Age of Shakespeare. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Munday, Anthony. 1605. Falsehood in friendship, or Unions Vizard: Or Wolves in Lambskin. London: John Charlewood.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. 2010. Shakespeare and chronology: Edward Dowden’s biographical readings. Forum for Modern Language Studies 46 (2): 130–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nashe, Thomas. 1592. Pierce Pennilesse, His Supplication to the Devil. London.Google Scholar
Osgood, Charles Egerton, George J. Suci & Percy H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Paster, Gail Kern. 2004. Humouring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paster, Gail Kern, Katherine Rowe & Mary Floyd Wilson (eds). 2004. Reading the Early Modern Passions: Essays In the Cultural History of Emotion. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., Matthias R. Mehl & Kate G. Niederhoffer. 2003. Psychological aspects of natural language use: Our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology 541: 547–577. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reddy, William M. 2001. The Navigation of Feeling: A Framework for the History of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwyzer, Philip. 2010. “Lees and moonshine”: Remembering Richard III, 1485–1635. Renaissance Quarterly 63 (3): 850–883. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sclater, William. 1612. The Christians Strength. Oxford: Joseph Barne.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. 1999. The Acoustic World of Early Modern England: Attending to the O Factor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2010. Phenomenal Shakespeare. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare Plays Corpus. 2008. Adapted by Jane Demmen from Mike Scott’s Shakespeare Corpus. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 8 June 2018).
Stern, Tiffany & Stephen Palfrey. 2007. Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stone, Philip J., Dexter C. Dunphy, Marshall S. Smith, & Daniel M. Ogilvie. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thelwall, Mike & Kevan Buckley. 2013. Topic-based sentiment analysis for the social web: The role of mood and issue-related words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64 (8): 1608–1617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelwall, Mike, Kevan Buckley & Georgios Paltoglou. 2012. Sentiment strength detection for the social web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (1): 163–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thelwall, Mike, Kevan Buckley, Georgios Paltoglou, Di Cai & Arvid Kappas. 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61 (12): 2544–2558. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turney, Peter. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: 417–424. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 8 June 2018).
Van Es, Bart. 2013. Shakespeare in Company. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, R. S. (ed.) 1991. The Merry Wives of Windsor. Hemel Hempstead: Twayne Publishers.Google Scholar
White, R. S. & Ciara Rawnsley. 2015. Discrepant emotional awareness in Shakespeare. In The Renaissance of Emotion: Understanding Affect in Shakespeare and His Contemporaries, Richard Meek & Erin Sullivan (eds). Manchester: Manchester University Press, 241–263.Google Scholar
White, R. S. 2012. “False friends”: Affective semantics in Shakespeare. Shakespeare 8 (3): 286–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Amiri, Mahsa, Maryam Yaghtin & Hajar Sotudeh
2024. How do tweeters feel about scientific misinformation: an infoveillance sentiment analysis of tweets on retraction notices and retracted papers. Scientometrics 129:1 ► pp. 261 ff. DOI logo
Sarsam, Samer Muthana & Hosam Al-Samarraie
2022. A lexicon-based method for detecting eye diseases on microblogs. Applied Artificial Intelligence 36:1 DOI logo
Sarsam, Samer Muthana & Hosam Al-Samarraie
2022. Early-stage detection of eye diseases on microblogs: glaucoma recognition. International Journal of Information Technology 14:1 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Sarsam, Samer Muthana, Hosam Al-Samarraie, Ahmed Ibrahim Alzahrani, Waleed Alnumay & Andrew Paul Smith
2021. A lexicon-based approach to detecting suicide-related messages on Twitter. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 65 ► pp. 102355 ff. DOI logo
Sarsam, Samer Muthana, Hosam Al-Samarraie, Nurhidayah Bahar, Abdul Samad Shibghatullah, Atef Eldenfria & Ahmed Al-Sa’Di
2021. Detecting Real-Time Correlated Simultaneous Events in Microblogs: The Case of Men’s Olympic Football. In HCI in Games: Experience Design and Game Mechanics [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12789], ► pp. 368 ff. DOI logo
Vodyanitskaya, Al'bina Aleksandrovna
2020. Evaluativeness of Academic Discourse through the Lenses of Translation: Potential of Digital Technologies. Philology. Theory & Practice 13:6 ► pp. 262 ff. DOI logo
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.