Article published in:
Revisiting Shakespeare's Language
Edited by Annalisa Baicchi, Roberta Facchinetti, Silvia Cacchiani and Antonio Bertacca
[English Text Construction 11:1] 2018
► pp. 60–80

Lear’s questions revisited

| Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg
This paper applies a pragmatic approach to King Lear’s questions. To this end the communicative function of different types of questions is worked out first. In a second step Lear’s questions are correlated to the dramatic development of the play. In terms of dramatic text construction, the two questions from the opening of the play – “Which of you shall we say doth love us most” (1.1.51) – and from the play’s final act – “Why should a dog, a horse, a rat, have life, / And thou no breath at all?” (5.3.305–6) – epitomise the complete change of the tragic hero from a more than self-assured person and instigator of his tragic downfall to a human being whose beliefs are shattered.
Keywords: communicative functions, interrogative, King Lear, question, speaker conditions, syntactic form
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Questions in Present-day English
    • 2.1To what extent can the repertoire of PdE questions be transferred to Shakespearean English?
    • 2.2The discoursal context of plays: Participant roles, text, and staging
  • 3.Corpus study: King Lear’s questions
    • 3.1Analysis of Act I
      • 3.1.1Act I, Scene 1 “The state division scene” (1.1.48–109)
      • 3.1.2Act I, Scene 1 “Lear and the Duke of Burgundy” (1.1.190–208)
      • 3.1.3Act I, Scene 4 “Lear and Kent” (1.4.9-40)
      • 3.1.4Act I, Scene 4 “Lear, Oswald and a Knight” (1.4.44–61)
      • 3.1.5Act I, Scene 4 “Lear and his fool” (1.4.103–172)
      • 3.1.6Act I, Scene 4 “Lear and Goneril” (1.4.209–231)
      • 3.2Analysis of Act II, Scene 2 “Lear and Gloucester” (2.2.277–292)
      • 3.3Analysis of Act III, Scene 2 “Lear and the naked wretches” (3.2.67–73)
    • 3.4Analysis of Act IV, Scene 6 “Lear and Gloucester” (4.6.96–152)
    • 3.5Analysis of Act V
  • 4.Lear’s questions in the overall framework of the play
  • Notes
  • Primary data
  • References
Published online: 27 August 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00004.bus
References

Primary data

Foakes, R. A.
(ed.) 1997 King Lear (The Arden Shakespeare, third series). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Halio, Jay L.
(ed.) 1992 The Tragedy of King Lear (The New Cambridge Shakespeare). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Asmuth, Berhard
1990 Einführung in die Dramenanalyse. 3rd ed. Stuttgart: Metzler. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Normand
1981 The Secret Cause: A Discussion of Tragedy. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Blake, Norman F.
2002 A Grammar of Shakespeare’s Language. Houndmills: Palgrave. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Busse, Ulrich
2008 An inventory of directives in Shakespeare’s King Lear . In Speech Acts in the History of English, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 85–114. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, Malcom
1985 An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2012 The dialogue of plays and their contexts from the Early Modern period to the present-day. In Historical Perspectives on Forms of English Dialogue, Gabriella Mazzon & Luisanna Fodde (eds). Milano: FrancoAngeli, 21–39.Google Scholar
Downes, William
1988 Discourse and drama: King Lear’s ‘question’ to his daughters. In The Taming of the Text: Explorations in Language, Literature and Culture, Willie van Peer (ed.). London and New York: Routledge, 225–257.Google Scholar
Greiner, Norbert & Jörg Hasler
1982 Einführung ins Drama. 21 vols. Munich and Vienna: Hanser.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney
2002 Clause type and illocutionary force. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 853–945. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mack, Maynard
1965 King Lear in Our Time. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Nowottny, Winifred M. T.
1957 Lear’s questions. Shakespeare Survey 101: 90–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, Manfred
1977 Das Drama: Theorie und Analyse. Munich: Fink.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Short, Mick
1981 Discourse analysis and the analysis of drama. Applied Linguistics 2 (2): 180–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019. The year’s work in stylistics 2018. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4 ► pp. 354 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.