Taming iconicity in the Spanish and Italian translations of Shakespeare’s Sonnets
Some observations from a (Contrastive) (Cognitive) Construction Grammar perspective
Building on Tabakowska’s (
1993,
2003,
2005,
2009,
2013) full-blown defense of a cognitive linguistic approach to literary translation as well as on
previous research dealing with the implementations of Construction Grammar(s) for translation studies (
Szymańska 2011a,
2011b;
Serbina 2015), this paper critically examines the role of iconicity in selected lines from Shakespeare’s
Sonnets capitalizing on the passage of Time-Death and their corresponding translations in present-day Spanish
and Italian. Specifically, drawing on Cognitive Construction Grammar (
Goldberg 2006)
and Contrastive Construction Grammar (
Boas 2010a;
Boas & Gonzálvez-García 2014), I focus on instances of secondary predication with verbs of sensory perception,
causative constructions and aspectual constructions iconically connected with the above-mentioned motif and demonstrate that
iconicity emerges as a very useful communicative ‘filter’ that can help to minimize any undesirable arbitrariness which may
obscure the semantico-pragmatic interpretation of the source text and/or its rendering into the target text.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Iconicity: Some initial working assumptions
- 3.Construction Grammar(s) and interlingual translation
- 4.Towards a constructionist account of verb complementation in English, Spanish, and Italian
- 5.Some notes on the iconicity of Time-Death fracture in the Italian and Spanish translations of Shakespeare’s Sonnets
- 5.1Some preliminary considerations
- 5.2The sensory subjective-transitive construction
- 5.3Causative constructions
- 6.Closing remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
- Key to the translations used in this paper
-
References
References (130)
References
Achard, Michel. 1998. Representation of Cognitive Structures: Syntax and Semantics of French Sentential Complements (Cognitive Linguistics Research Series 11). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alm-Arvius, Christina. 1993. The English Verb See: A Study in Multiple Meaning. Göteborg: Acta Universitas Gothoburgensis.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Álvarez, José María. 1999. Sonetos. Valencia: Pre-Textos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baldini, Gabriele. 1992. William Shakespeare: Sonetti. Milan: Feltrinelli. (Translation by Lucifero Darchini.)![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boas, Hans C. 2010b. Comparing constructions across languages. In Contrastive Studies in Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 10), Hans C. Boas (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1968. Entailment and the meaning of structures. Glossa 21: 119–127.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1974. Concept and percept: Two infinitive constructions and their vicissitudes. In World Papers in Phonetics: Festschrift for Dr. Onishi’s Kiju, Masao Ōnishi (ed.). Tokyo: Phonetic Society of Japan, 65–91.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Borkin, Ann. 1973. To be or not to be. Chicago Linguistic Society Proceedings 91: 44–56.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brinton, Laurel J. 1985. The iconic role of aspect in Shakespeare’s Sonnet 129. Poetics Today 6 (3): 447–459. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Butler, Christopher S. & Francisco Gonzálvez-García. 2014. Exploring Functional-Cognitive Space (Studies in Language Companion Series 157). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan. 2003. Aspect. In International Encyclopedia of Linguistics. 2nd ed., W. J. Frawley (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 157–158.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chamosa González, José Luis. 1997. Crítica y evaluación de traducciones: Elementos para su discusión. In Aproximaciones a los Estudios de Traducción, Purificación Fernández Nistal & José María Bravo Gozalo (eds). Valladolid: University of Valladolid Press, 29–50.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cifuentes Honrubia, José Luis & José Luis Tornel Sala. 1996. El predicativo en español: Iconicidad y gramática. Lingüística Española Actual XVIII1: 17–47.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Eve V. 1971. On the acquisition of the meaning of after and before. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 101: 266–275. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Declerck, Renaat. 1982. The triple origin of participial perception verb complements. Journal of English Linguistics 161: 27–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demonte, Violeta. 1991. Observaciones sobre la predicación secundaria: Mando-c, extracción y reanálisis. In Detrás de la Palabra, Violeta Demonte (ed.). Madrid: Alianza, 157–201.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger. 2005. Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses. Linguistics 431: 449–470. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger. 2008. Iconicity of sequence. A corpus-based analysis of the positioning of temporal adverbial clauses in English. Cognitive Linguistics 191: 465–490. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Diessel, Holger. 2013. Adverbial subordination. In Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds). London: Continuum, 341–354.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duffley, Patrick. 1992. The English Infinitive. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ebeling, Jarle. 1998. Using translations to explore construction meaning in English and Norwegian. In Corpora and Cross-linguistic Research: Theory, Method and Case Studies, Stig Johansson & Signe Oksefjell (eds). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 169–195.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Enkvist, Nils Erik. 1990. Discourse comprehension, text strategies and style. AMULA 731: 166–180.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanego, Teresa. 1990a. Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare’s English. I. Studia Neophilologica 621: 3–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanego, Teresa. 1990b. Finite complement clauses in Shakespeare’s English. II. Studia Neophilologica 621: 129–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanego, Teresa. 1992. Infinitival Complements in Shakespeare’s English. Santiago de Compostela: University of Santiago de Compostela Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fenk-Oczlon, Gertraud. 1991. Frequenz und kognition – Frequenz und markiertheit. Folia Linguistica 251: 361–394. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga C. M. 1996. Verbal complementation in Early Middle English: How do the infinitives fit in? In English Historical Linguistics 1994, Derek Britton (ed.). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 247–270.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga C. M. 1999. Changes in infinitival constructions in English. In Anglistentag 1998, Sabine Schulting & Fritz-Wilhelm Neumann (eds). Erfurt Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, 7–27.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, Olga & Max Nänny (eds). 2001. The Motivated Sign (Iconicity in Language and Literature 2). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ford, Cecilia E. 1993. Grammar in Interaction: Adverbial Clauses in American English Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Galera Masegosa, Alicia & Francisco José Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez. 2012. Lexical class and perspectivization constraints on subsumption in the Lexical Constructional Model: The case of say verbs in English. Language Sciences 341: 54–64. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García Calvo, Agustín. 1974. William Shakespeare/Sonetos de Amor. Barcelona: Anagrama. 1998 edition.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García García, Luciano. 2013. Sonetos y Querellas de una Amante. William Shakespeare. Edición en Inglés, Traducción y Notas. Valencia: JPM Ediciones.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 1990. Syntax. A Functional-Typological Approach. Vol. 21. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An Introduction. Volume II1. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: Chicago University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. 2009. The family of object-related depictives in English and Spanish: First steps towards a constructionist, usage-based analysis. Language Sciences 311: 663–723. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. 2011. Metaphor and metonymy do not render coercion superfluous: Evidence from the subjective-transitive construction. Linguistics 49 (6): 1305–1358. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco. 2014. Bringing together fragments and constructions: Evidence from complementation in English and Spanish. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 15), Hans C. Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 181–226.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gramley, Stephan. 1987. The Infinitive Forms of English as Verb Complements. Duisburg: LAUD.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993. Causative and Perception Verbs (A Comparative Study). Turin: Rosenberg & Sellier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 1980. The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56 (3): 515–540. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59 (4): 781–819. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 1994. Iconicity. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Ronald E. Asher (ed.). Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1629–1633.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John. 2006. Iconicity. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Vol. V1. 2nd ed., Keith Brown (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 457–461. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halverson, Sandra L. 2007. A cognitive linguistic approach to translation shifts. In The Study of Language and Translation, Willy Vandeweghe, Sonia Vandepitte & Marc van de Velde (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 105–121.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halverson, Sandra L. 2010. Cognitive translation studies. In Translation and Cognition, Gregory Shreve & Erik Angelone (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 349–369. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halverson, Sandra L. 2013. Implications of cognitive linguistics for translation studies. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in some Theoretical Models and Applications, Ana Rojo & Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 33–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hansen-Schirra, Silvia & Stella Neumann. 2012. Corpus enrichment, representation, exploitation, and quality control. In Cross-linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English-German, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Stella Neumann & Erich Steiner (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 35–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haspelmath, Martin. 2008. Frequency vs. iconicity in explaining grammatical asymmetries. Cognitive Linguistics 191: 1–33. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hernanz, María Luisa. 1988. En torno a la sintaxis y semántica de los complementos predicativos en español. Estudi General 81: 7–29.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hiraga, Masako K. 1994. Diagrams and metaphors: Iconic aspects in language. Journal of Pragmatics 221: 5–21. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hollmann, Willem B. 2015. The iconicity of infinitival complementation in present-day English causatives. In Inside-Out (Iconicity in Language and Literature 4), Costantino Maeder, Olga Fischer & William J. Herlofsky (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 286–306.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Horie, Kaoru. 1993. A cross-linguistic study of perception and cognition verb complements: A cognitive perspective. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
House, Juliane. 1997. Translation Quality Assessment: A Model Revisited. Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huddleston, Rodney. 1969. Predicate complement constructions in English (A review article). Lingua 231: 241–273. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
James, Francis. 1987. Semantics of the English Subjunctive. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Karttunen, Lauri. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 471: 340–358. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kirsner, Robert & Sandra A. Thompson. 1976. The role of pragmatic inference in semantics: A study of sensory verb complements in English. Glossa 101: 200–240.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991a. Concept, Image, and Symbol (The Cognitive Basis of Grammar). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 1991b. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lvóvskaya, Zinaida. 1997. Problemas Actuales de Traducción. Granada: Granada Lingüística & Método Ediciones.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Machacek, Jaroslav. 1965. Complementation of the English Verb by the Accusative-with-Infinitive and the Content Clause. Prague: Státi Pedgagocké Nakaldatelsví.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
MacWhinney, Brian, Andrej Malchukov & Edith Moravcsik (eds). 2014. Competing Motivations in Grammar and Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCandless, Robert Ian. 1993. La popularidad de un texto isabelino en España: Los sonetos de Shakespeare. Sendebar 41: 225–244.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maeder, Costantino, Olga Fischer & William J. Herlofsky (eds). 2005. Outside-In – Inside-Out (Iconicity in Language and Literature 4). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Micó, José María. 1985. Una traición a Shakespeare. Cuadernos de Traducción e Interpretación 5–61: 53–57.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mujica Laínez, Manuel. 1983. Sonetos de William Shakespeare. Madrid: Visor.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mujica Laínez, Manuel. 1985. Recuerdo de Procusto: Traducir a Shakespeare. Cuadernos de Traducción e Interpretación 5–61: 41–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Müller, Wolfgang G. & Olga Fischer (eds). 2003. From Sign to Signing (Iconicity in Language and Literature 3). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nänny, Max & Olga Fischer. 2006. Iconicity: Literary texts. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier, 462–472. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Newmark, Peter. 1987. Manual de Traducción. Madrid: Cátedra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nida, Eugene A. 1964. Towards a Science of Translating: With Special Reference to Principles and Procedures Involved in Bible Translating. Leiden: Brill.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez Romero, Carmen. 1987. Monumento de Amor (Los Sonetos de W. Shakespeare Vertidos al Español en Sonetos). Cáceres: University of Extremadura Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez Romero, Carmen. 1988. Sanciones aduaneras en la frontera anglo-española al traducir los sonetos de Shakespeare. Cuadernos de Traducción e Interpretación 101: 19–37.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Praz, Mario. 1964. Shakespeare-Tutte le Opere. Florence: Sansoni.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Riddle, Elizabeth R. 1975. Some pragmatic conditions on complementizer choice. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 111: 467–474.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodríguez Espiñeira, María José. 1989. El complemento predicativo del complemento directo en español. PhD dissertation, University of Santiago de Compostela.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodríguez Espiñeira, María José. 2002. Percepción directa e indirecta en español. Diferencias semánticas y formales. Verba 271: 33–85.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rojo, Ana & Javier Valenzuela. 2013. Constructing meaning in translation: The role of constructions in translation problems. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in some Theoretical Models and Applications, Ana Rojo & Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 283–310. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, Francisco José. 2013. Pedagogical grammar and meaning construction. Plenary lecture given at the 1st International Constructionist Approaches to Language Pedagogy Conference (CALP 2013), Brussels, 8–9 November 2013.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rutelli, Romana. 1986. Shakespeare: I Sonetti. Milan: Garzanti.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salvi, Giorgio. 1981. Complementi predicativi. Studi di Grammatica Italiana 101: 313–349.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Serbina, Tatiana. 2015. A Construction Grammar approach to the analysis of translation shifts: A corpus-based study. PhD dissertation, RWTH Aachen University. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 8 June 2018).
Shakespeare, W. 1995. Sonetti. Testo Inglese a Fronte. Milan: BUR. Translation by A. Serpieri. 2015 edition.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1976. Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of English Causative Constructions. New York: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Song, J. J. 2006. Causatives: Semantics. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, Keith Brown (ed.). Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier, 265–268. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spaulding, Robert K. 1933. Infinitive and subjunctive with hacer, mandar, dejar, and the like. Hispania 16 (4): 425–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Spears, Arthur K. 1977. The semantics of English complementation. PhD dissertation, University of California at San Diego.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szymańska, Izabela. 2011a. Mosaics: A Construction-grammar-based Approach to Translation. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Semper.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szymańska, Izabela. 2011b. Construction Grammar as a framework for describing translation: A prolegomenon. In New Perspectives in Language, Discourse and Translation Studies (Second Language Learning and Teaching), Mirosław Pawlak & Jakub Bielak (eds). Berlin: Springer, 215–225. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 1993. Cognitive Linguistics and Poetics of Translation. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 2003. Iconicity and literary translation. In From Sign to Signing (Iconicity in Language and Literature 3), Wolfgang G. Müller & Olga Fischer (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 361–376. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 2005. Iconicity as a function of point of view. In Outside-In – Inside-Out (Iconicity in Language and Literature 4), Costantino Maeder, Olga Fischer & William J. Herlofsky (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 375–387. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. Iconicity. 2009. Grammar, Meaning and Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatics Highlights 5), Frank Brisard, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 129–145. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta. 2013. (Cognitive) grammar in translation: Form as meaning. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation: Advances in some Theoretical Models and Applications, Ana Rojo & Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (eds). Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 229–250. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tabakowska, Elżbieta, Christina Ljunberg & Olga Fischer (eds). 2007. Insistent Images (Iconicity in Language and Literature 5). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ungaretti, Giuseppe. 1986. Saggi e Interventi. Milan: Mondadori.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valenzuela, A. 1999. Álvarez: Los Sonetos de Shakespeare son indestructibles. La Verdad (Diario de Murcia), 25th April 1999, p. 72.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Van der Meer, Geart. 1994. Verbs of perception and their complementation. English Studies 51: 468–480. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zandvoort, Reinard Willem & Jan Ate Van Ek. 1962. A Handbook of English Grammar. 6th ed. London: Longman Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zazo, Anna Luisa. 1993. Shakespeare: Sonetti. Milan: Mondadori.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Statham, Simon & Rocío Montoro
2019.
The year’s work in stylistics 2018.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 28:4
► pp. 354 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 august 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.