Review published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 12:1 (2019) ► pp.143153
References
Bateman, John
2014Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Johan & Jordan Zlatev
2014Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (3): 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2011How language shapes thought. Scientific American 304 (2): 62–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner
2005The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112 (1): 193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2008Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 581: 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2016Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 587–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Dagmar Divjak
2015Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
2017Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 371–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devylder, Simon & Jordan Zlatev
Forthcoming. Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the motivation and sedimentation model. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, Annalisa Baicchi & Günter Radden eds Amsterdam and Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan
2016Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens
(eds) 2007The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. J.
2005The psychological status of image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning, Beate Hampe (ed.). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Jennifer
2014Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Peter
1996Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
1978The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
2003What is Language? Turku: University of Turku Press.Google Scholar
2008Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6): 15–33.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
2013Cognitive Linguistics–The Quantitative Turn: The Essential Reader. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
(ed.) 2009The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan
1984When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
2012Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
2009Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi
In press. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication.
Steen, Gerard J.
2011The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut
2004Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache: Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte. Theorien. Analysemethoden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2012Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground down. In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky
2011Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS one 6 (2): e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2007Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (3): 445–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2018Mimesis theory, learning, and polysemiotic communication. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Michael A. Peters (ed.). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Johan Blomberg
2016Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Brône, Geert
2021. The multimodal negotiation of irony and humor in interaction. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse. Constructions and Frames 13:1  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Simon Devylder, Rebecca Defina, Kalina Moskaluk & Linea Brink Andersen
2023. Analyzing polysemiosis: language, gesture, and depiction in two cultural practices with sand drawing. Semiotica 2023:253  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Göran Jacobsson & Liina Paju
2021. Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.