Review published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 12:1 (2019) ► pp.143153
References
Bateman, John
2014Text and Image: A Critical Introduction to the Visual/Verbal Divide. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, Johan & Jordan Zlatev
2014Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13 (3): 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera
2011How language shapes thought. Scientific American 304 (2): 62–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F. & Dedre Gentner
2005The career of metaphor. Psychological Review 112 (1): 193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Casasanto, Daniel
2008Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 581: 63–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2016Typology and the future of Cognitive Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 587–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowska, Ewa & Dagmar Divjak
2015Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Lieven Vandelanotte
2017Viewpoint phenomena in multimodal communication. Cognitive Linguistics 28 (3): 371–380. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devylder, Simon & Jordan Zlatev
Forthcoming. Cutting and breaking metaphors of the self and the motivation and sedimentation model. In Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, Annalisa Baicchi & Günter Radden eds Amsterdam and Philadelphia John Benjamins DOI logo
Divjak, Dagmar, Natalia Levshina & Jane Klavan
2016Cognitive Linguistics: Looking back, looking forward. Cognitive Linguistics 27 (4): 447–463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk & Hubert Cuyckens
(eds) 2007The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. J.
2005The psychological status of image schemas. In From Perception to Meaning, Beate Hampe (ed.). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton, 113–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Green, Jennifer
2014Drawn from the Ground: Sound, Sign and Inscription in Central Australian Sand Stories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harder, Peter
1996Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund
1978The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology: An Introduction to Phenomenological Philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
2003What is Language? Turku: University of Turku Press.Google Scholar
2008Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (6): 15–33.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A.
2013Cognitive Linguistics–The Quantitative Turn: The Essential Reader. Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, Carey
(ed.) 2009The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lane, Harlan
1984When the Mind Hears: A History of the Deaf. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Linell, Per
2009Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice
2012Phenomenology of Perception. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia
2009Metaphors Dead and Alive, Sleeping and Waking: A Dynamic View. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stampoulidis, Georgios & Marianna Bolognesi
In press. Bringing metaphors back to the streets: A corpus-based study for the identification and interpretation of rhetorical figures in street art. Visual Communication.
Steen, Gerard J.
2011The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics 9 (1): 26–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stöckl, Hartmut
2004Die Sprache im Bild – Das Bild in der Sprache: Zur Verknüpfung von Sprache und Bild im massenmedialen Text. Konzepte. Theorien. Analysemethoden. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sweetser, Eve
2012Introduction: Viewpoint and perspective in language and gesture, from the ground down. In Viewpoint in Language: A Multimodal Perspective, Barbara Dancygier and Eve Sweetser (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, Paul H. & Lera Boroditsky
2011Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS one 6 (2): e16782. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zinken, Jörg
2007Discourse metaphors: The link between figurative language and habitual analogies. Cognitive Linguistics 18 (3): 445–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan
2018Mimesis theory, learning, and polysemiotic communication. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory, Michael A. Peters (ed.). Singapore: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan & Johan Blomberg
2016Embodied intersubjectivity, sedimentation and non-actual motion expressions. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39 (2): 185–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 4 other publications

Brône, Geert
2021. The multimodal negotiation of irony and humor in interaction. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 109 ff. DOI logo
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2021. Creative constructs, constructions, and frames in Internet discourse. Constructions and Frames 13:1  pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Simon Devylder, Rebecca Defina, Kalina Moskaluk & Linea Brink Andersen
2023. Analyzing polysemiosis: language, gesture, and depiction in two cultural practices with sand drawing. Semiotica 2023:253  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Zlatev, Jordan, Göran Jacobsson & Liina Paju
2021. Desiderata for metaphor theory, the Motivation & Sedimentation Model and motion-emotion metaphoremes. In Figurative Language – Intersubjectivity and Usage [Figurative Thought and Language, 11],  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.