Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 13:2 (2020) ► pp.158–177

Conflict-motivated acts in the open letters of two former Nigerian presidents

| Redeemer’s University
| Redeemer’s University

This study investigates conflict-motivated pragmatic acts employed in the open letters exchanged by two former Nigerian presidents (Olusegun Obasanjo and Goodluck Jonathan). The data are analysed using Mey’s pragmatic act theory. The findings reveal that while Obasanjo employs pragmatic acts of warning, appealing, and praising in order to counsel Jonathan, Jonathan employs pragmatic acts of acknowledging, boasting, correcting, and reminding in order to defend himself. However, they both employ the pragmatic acts of insulting, complaining, accusing, and requesting. These acts are influenced by nationalist and anti-ethnic ideologies as well as the context of the open letters, i.e., conflict among political leaders in Nigeria.

Keywords: acts, context, ideology, political letters, pragmatic acts, Nigeria
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background of Obasanjo and Jonathan’s open letter exchange
  • 3.Theoretical framework
  • 4.Data and methods
  • 5.Analysis and discussion
    • 5.1Pragmatic acts used by Obasanjo
      • 5.1.1Warning
      • 5.1.2Appealing
      • 5.1.3Praising
    • 5.2Pragmatic acts used by Jonathan
      • 5.2.1Acknowledging
      • 5.2.2Boasting
      • 5.1.3Correcting
      • 5.2.4Reminding
    • 5.3Pragmatic acts employed by Obasanjo and Jonathan
      • 5.3.1Insulting
      • 5.3.2Complaining
      • 5.3.2Accusing
      • 5.3.3Requesting
  • 6.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00039.unu
References
Akyeampong, Emmanuel K. & Henry L. Gates, Jr.
(eds) 2012 Dictionary of African Biography. London: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Allan, Keith
2010 Referring as a pragmatic act. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (11): 2919–2931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anchimbe, Eric
2013 ‘Motions of Support’ and the communicative act of thanking in political discourse. In The Pragmatics of Political Discourse, Anita Fetzer (ed). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 219–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ashraf, Hina
2014 Letters to the editor: A resistant genre of unrepresented voices. Discourse and Communication 8 (1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auchmuty, Rosemary
1994 Inversions: A tribute to the late all-women publishing house, open letters. Women’s History Review 3 (3): 439–443. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Austin, John
1962 How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Robert M. Harnish
1979 Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bagwasi, Mompoloki M.
2008 Pragmatics of letter writing in Setswana. Journal of Pragmatics 40 (3): 525–536. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chiluwa, Innocent
2015 Radicalist discourse: A study of the stances of Nigeria’s Boko Haram and Somalia’s Al Shabaab on twitter. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 101: 214–235. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Compton, Josh & Jordan L. Compton
2013 College sports, losing seasons, and image repair through open letters to fans. Communication and Sport 2 (4): 345–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cutting, Joan
(2002) Pragmatics and Discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doty, Kathleen L. & Risto Hiltunen
2009 Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 458–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce
1996 Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6 (2): 167–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geis, Michael L.
1995 Speech Acts and Conversational Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alex & Debbie G. E. Ho
2010 The act of complaining in Brunei – then and Now. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (3): 840–855. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Igwebuike, Ebuka & Ikenna Kamalu
2015 A critical discourse analysis of rhetorical strategies in open letters to president Olusegun Obasanjo in selected Nigerian newspapers. In Essays on Language, Communication and Literature in Africa, Akin Odebunmi & Joyce T. Mathangwane (eds). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 250–274.Google Scholar
Kecskes, Istvan
2010 Situation-bound utterances as pragmatic acts. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (11): 2889–2897. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kupolati, Oluwateniola Oluwabukola & Eniola Boluwaduro
2018 Gubernatorial debate sessions in Nigeria: A socio-cognitive analysis. Discourse and Communication 12 (1): 20–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landert, Daniela & Andreas H. Jucker
2010 Private and public in mass media communication: From letters to the editor to online commentaries. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (5): 1422–1434. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, John. R. & Peter R. R. White
(2005) The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York NY: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mey, Jacob L.
2001 Pragmatics: An Introduction. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Monehin, Funmi
2015 A Stylistic Analysis of Language of Politics in the Open Letters Exchanged between Chief Olusegun Obasanjo and President Goodluck Jonathan (Unpublished BA thesis). Redeemer’s University, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen
(eds) 2007 Letter Writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nwokocha, Stanley
2014 Nigeria: Godfathers-Godson Relationships Gone Sour. [URL] [URL]
Odebunmi, Akin
2006 A pragmatic reading of Ahmed Yerima’s proverbs in Yemoja, Attahiru, and Dry Leaves on Ukan Trees . Intercultural Pragmatics 3 (2): 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Pragmatic functions of crisis-motivated proverbs in Ola Rotimi’s The God’s are not to Blame . Linguistik Online 33 (1): 73–84.Google Scholar
2015 Ọmọlúàbí. In Handbook of Pragmatics Online (Vol. 191). Ola J. Ostman & Jef Verschueren (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oladipo, Dotun
2013 Nigeria needs clarity of purpose – Akinyemi. The Punch, August: 541. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R.
1969 Speech Acts. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Ming-Yu
2010 The pragmatic act of fishing for personal details: From choice to performance. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (7):1982–1996. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Unuabonah, Foluke
2011 Our threatened democracy: A socio-cognitive study of a memo to the Federal Executive Council (FEC) of Nigeria. Issues in Political Discourse Analysis 4 (1): 59–71.Google Scholar
Uzoigwe, Amara M.
2011 The Nigerian Christian Attitude to Civic Duties: An Exegetical Application of Romans 131: 1–7 (Unpublished MA thesis). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.Google Scholar
Van Dijk, Teun
2001 Critical discourse analysis. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 352–371.Google Scholar
2002 Political discourse and political cognition. In Politics as Text and Talk. Analytical approaches to political discourse, Paul A. Chilton & Christina Schäffner (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 204–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Politics, ideology and discourse. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Wodak Ruth (ed). London: Elsevier, 728–740.Google Scholar
2006 Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies 8 (1): 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Society and discourse: How social contexts influence text and talk. Journal of Language and Politics 9 (3): 469–474. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, Jef
1999 Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
2000 Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, Peter R. R.
2011 Appraisal. In Jan Zienkwoski, Jan-Ola Östman and Jef Verschueren (eds), Discursive Pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 14–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar