Non-coherent cohesive texts
Lucky’s soliloquy in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot
This article examines the function of cohesive devices (i.e., the linguistic tools that are usually used to link
the various parts of the text) in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. In Lucky’s soliloquy, certain cohesive devices are
employed intensively so as to impede immediate understanding. At the same time, Beckett’s distinctive use of cohesive devices
uniquely establishes a more profound awareness of the work’s message, which this article identifies as strategic coherence. This
paper employed an embedded (QUAL:quan) mixed-methods approach and a validated model of cohesion to analyse Lucky’s speech.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Setting the scene
- 1.2Theoretical framework
- 1.3Statement of the problem and research purpose
- 2.Literature review
- 2.1Types of cohesive devices
- 2.2Related work
- 2.3Beckettian studies and Waiting for Godot
- 3.Methodology
- 3.1Mixed-methods design
- 3.2Research procedure and instruments
- 4.Findings and discussion
- 5.Conclusions and recommendations
- Note
-
References
References (77)
References
Abd Allah, Mohamed Jabraddar Mahil. 2019. Investigating cohesive
devices in Wordsworth’s poetry. Arab World English
Journal 3 (1): 157–177.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abduh, Amirullah & Rosmaladewi Rosmaladewi. 2017. Taking
the Lextutor on-line tool to examine students’ vocabulary level in business in English
students. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology
Education 151: 283–286.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abdul Rahman, Zuhair Abdul Amir. 2013. The use of cohesive devices
in descriptive writing by Omani student-teachers. Sage
Open 3 (4): 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abdulrahman, Nishad. 2018. Substitution
and ellipsis in the first year university students’ English essay writing. Journal for
Researching Education Practice and
Theory 1 (2): 30–40.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S. & John Mckenny. 2017. The
flesh and the bones of cohesive devices: Towards a comprehensive model. Journal of World
Languages 4 (2): 94–117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abu-Ayyash, Emad A. S. 2020. Context and culture via
cohesive devices in higher education students’ and professional writers’ opinion articles. GEMA
Online® Journal of Language
Studies 20 (1): 106–120. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Akhter, Javed, Khair Muhammad & Naila Naz. 2015. Waiting
for Godot: A Marxist study. International Journal of Literature and
Arts 3 (4): 42–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Akhter, Javed. 2015. Waiting
for Godot: A deconstructive study. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural
Studies 2(1): 42–63.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Albee, Edward. 2007. Samuel
Beckett. The Princeton University Library
Chronicle 68 (1–2): 429–430. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Almalki, Sami. 2016. Integrating
quantitative and qualitative data in mixed methods research-challenges and benefits. Journal of
Education and
Learning 5 (3): 288–296. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alogaili, Khalid J. Oudah & Ali G. Khalaf. 2018. Universality
of Waiting for Godot. International Journal of Languages, Literature and
Linguistics 4(1): 39–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Al-Pachachi, Ahmed. O. & Aseel A. Naser. 2016. The
use of cohesive devices in English drama texts for adults and children. Angloamericanae
Journal 1 (1): 28–60.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Amin, Momen Yasin, Rangeen Omer Abdulla, Sara Saad Ali & Mahmoud Khalid Ahmed. 2019. Symbolic
analysis of Waiting for Godot: A critical comparison between the Bible and Quran symbols in Waiting for
Godot. Studies in Literature and
language 19 (3): 96–104.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Atkins, Anselm. 1967. Lucky’s
speech in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot: A punctuated sense-line arrangement. Educational Theatre
Journal 19 (4): 426–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Awwad, Mohammad. 2017. Exophoric
and endophoric awareness. Arab World English
Journal 8 (3): 28–45. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bae, Jungok. 2001. Cohesion
and coherence in children’s written English: Immersion and English-only classes. Issues in
Applied
Linguistics 12 (1): 51–88. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mona. 2011. In
Other
Words. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Beckett, Samuel. 1954. Waiting
for Godot. New York: Grove Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Castro, Carolyn D. 2004. Cohesion and the social
construction of meaning in the essays of Filipino college students writing in L2 English. Asia
Pacific Education
Review 5 (2): 215–225. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Centonze, Laura. 2013. Conjunction
in ELF academic discourse: A corpus-based analysis. Lingue e
Linguaggi 101: 7–18.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charlier, Philippe & Saudamini Deo. 2017. Neurological
inspiration in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot. The Lancet
Neurology 16 (2): 108. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coetzee, John Maxwell. 2017. Late Essays
2006–2017. London: Penguin Random House.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cox, Beverly. E., Timothy Shanahan & Elizabeth Sulzby. 1990. Good
and poor elementary readers’ use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research
Quarterly 25 (1): 47–65. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Creswell, John. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning,
Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Esslin, Martin. 1960. The
theatre of the absurd. The Tulane Drama
Review 4 (4): 3–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Esslin, Martin. 2015. The
Theatre of the Absurd. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghanbari, Mohammad Reza. 2008. A comparative study of the notion of waiting for a savior in religion and in Waiting for Godot. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (5): 733-737.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
González, María de los Ángeles Gómez. 2010. Evaluating lexical cohesion
in telephone conversations. Discourse
Studies 12 (5): 599–623. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Granger, Sylviane & Stephabie Tyson. 1996. Connector
usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World
Englishes 15 (1): 17–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Green, Clarence. 2012. A
computational investigation of cohesion and lexical network density in L2 writing. English
Language
Teaching 5 (8): 57–69.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s
Introduction to Functional
Grammar. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion
in
English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M. A. K. & Ruqaiya Hasan. 1989. Language,
Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective 2nd
edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haney, William S. II. 2001. Beckett
out of his mind: The theatre of the absurd. Studies in the Literary
Imagination 34 (2): 39–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hayat, Mazhur, Saira Akhter & Sajida Iqbal. 2015. Deviations
of speech acts in Beckett’s Waiting for Godot: A study in pragmatics. European Scientific
journal 11(2): 356–373.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jafarpur, Abdoljavad. 1991. Cohesiveness
as a basis for evaluating
compositions. System 19 (4): 459–465. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Patricia. 1992. Cohesion
and coherence in compositions in Malay and English. RELC
Journal 23 (2): 1–17. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kaur, Surinder. 2015. A
study of cohesion devices in John Keats’ “Ode to Autumn”. Modern Research
Studies 2 (1): 134–143.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Keatinge, Benjamin. 2008. Beckett
and language pathology. Journal of Modern
Literature 31 (4): 86–101. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Khalil, Aziz. 1989. A
study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students’
writing. System 17 (3): 359–371. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lawley, Paul. 2008. Waiting
for Godot: Character
Study. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leech, Geoffrey, Benita Cruickshank & Roz Ivanic. 2001. An
a-z of English Grammar &
Usage. Essex: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liao, Su-Lien. 2014. Links
and blocks: The role of language in Samuel Beckett’s selected plays. International Journal of
Cognitive and Language
Sciences 8 (2): 390–395.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Ching-Hsi & Yen-Liang Lin. 2019. Grammatical
and lexical patterning of make in Asian learner writing: A corpus-based study of ICNALE. 3L:
Language, Linguistics,
Literature 25 (3): 1–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liu, Meihua & George Braine. 2005. Cohesive
features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese
undergraduates. System 33 (4): 623–636. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Locke, Terry. 2004. Critical
Discourse
Analysis. London: Continuum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lodico, Marguerite. G., Dean T. Spaulding & Katherine H. Voegtle. 2010. Methods
in Educational Research: From Theory to Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Maher, Carmel, Mark Hadfield, Maggie Hutchings & Adam de Eyto. 2018. Ensuring
rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining Nvivo with traditional material
methods. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods 17 (1): 1–13. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCarthy, Michael. 1991. Discourse
Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNamara, Danielle S. 2013. The epistemic stance between the
author and reader: A driving force in the cohesion of text and writing. Discourse
Studies 15 (5): 579–595. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McNamara, Danielle S., Scott A. Crossley & Rod Roscoe. 2013. Natural
language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system. Psychonomic
Society 45 (1): 499–515. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Moreno, Ana. L. 2003. The role of cohesive devices as
textual constraints on relevance: A discourse-as-process view. International Journal of English
Studies 3 (1): 111–165.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Na, Yoon-Hee. 2011. Cohesive
devices in CMC texts produced by American and Korean EFL writers. Linguistic
Research 28 (3): 743–771. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neuner, Jerome L. 1987. Cohesive ties and chains in good
and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of
English 21 (1): 92–105.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nur, Nur Aliyah. 2015. Analyzing vocabulary level
of the students’ essay writing and academic textbook utilizing Lextutor. ETERNAL: English
Teaching, Learning and research
Journal 1 (1): 15–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Othman, Ahmed Khider Ahmed. 2019. Investigation of grammatical
cohesive devices errors made by Saudi EFL students in written paragraphs: A case study of the University of Tabuk, Saudi
Arabia. European Scientific
Journal 15 (2): 1–10. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Palmer, Juan Carlos. 1999. Coherence and cohesion in
the English language classroom: The use of lexical reiteration and pronominalisation. RELC
Journal 30 (2): 61–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paramartha, Iwayan. W. 2013. Substitution as a cohesive
device in the dialogue of the drama
Pygmalion. Humanis 111: 43–49.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Salkie, Raphael. 1995. Text
and Discourse
Analysis. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shirazi, Masoumeh A. & Seyed Mohammad Mousavi Nadoushani. 2017. The
locus of adversative conjunctions in the research articles: Have they niched or vanished? Sage
Open: 1–6. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simpson, Paul. 1992. Teaching
stylistics: Analysing cohesion and narrative structure in a short story by Ernest
Hemmingway. Language and
Literature 1 (1): 47–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Struthers, Lynda, Judith C. Lapadat & Peter D. MacMillan. 2013. Assessing
cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist. Assessing
Writing 18(3): 187–201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thornbury, Scott. 2005. Beyond
the Sentence: Introducing Discourse
Analysis. Oxford: Macmillan Education.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tilney, Martin. 2018. Cohesive
harmony and theme in Peter Carey’s ‘The Last Days of a Famous Mime’. Language and
Literature 27 (1): 3–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ullah, Irfan, Liaqat Iqbal & Abdur Rehman. 2016. A
study of absurdity in Samuel Beckett’s play Waiting for Godot and Albert Camus novel The
Outsider
. Global Language
Review 1 (1): 46–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Unubi, Sunday Abraham. 2017. The use of conjunctions in
English and Igala: A contrastive analysis. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary
Research 4 (8): 34–62. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Velissariou, Aspasia. 1982. Language
in ‘Waiting for Godot’. Journal of Beckett
Studies 8 (1): 45–57.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witte, Stephen P. & Lester Faigley. 1981. Coherence,
cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and
Communication 32 (2): 189–204. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, Wenxing & Ying Sun. 2012. The
use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency
levels. Linguistics and
Education 23 (1): 31–48. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yayli, Demet. 2006. A
study of cohesion on ‘Holy Thursday’ poems of William Blake. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Dergisi 15(1): 437–448.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yeibo, Ebi. 2012. Aspects
of textual cohesion in selected poems of J.P. Clark-Bekederemo. Journal of Language Teaching
and
Research 3 (5): 860–867. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yeoh, Gilbert. 2000. J.
M. Coetzee and Samuel Beckett: Nothingness, minimalism, and indeterminacy. A Review of
International English
Literature 31 (4): 117–137.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zamawe, F. C. 2015. The
implication of using Nvivo software in qualitative data analysis: Evidence-based
reflections. Malawi Medical
Journal 27(1): 13–15. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhu, Jiang. 2013. Analysis
on the artistic features and themes of the theatre of the absurd. Theory and Practice in
Language
Studies 3 (8): 1462–1466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Khalil, Abdelhamid A., Emad A. S. Abu-Ayyash & Sa’Ed M. I. Salhieh
2023.
The Role of Lexical Cohesion in Improving Twelfth Graders’ Essay Writing Quality. In
BUiD Doctoral Research Conference 2022 [
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, 320],
► pp. 67 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.