Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.1–29

A contrastive look at Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing

 | Universidad Complutense de Madrid
This paper offers a detailed study of Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic texts. A corpus of around 45,000 words is examined from different perspectives to compare the realizations, functions and interplays of the point of departure in these two languages. Examples reveal crosslinguistic contrasts in terms of (a) the preferred realizations of thematic elements, (b) the strategies to maintain participant identity and present new participants and (c) the resources used to construe texture. We will see that whereas English favours thematic non-pronominal noun groups, Spanish combines these with other realizations. Additionally, the different syntactic characteristics of each language have a reflection on different ways of signalling semantic continuity and on textual development in general. The findings presented in this paper should make a significant contribution to the existing literature on Theme, as well as on academic writing and contrastive typological research.
Keywords: academic writing, contrastive, point of departure, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Theme
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and methodology
  • 3.The view from below: Realizations of the point of departure
  • 4.The view from above: Functions of the point of departure
  • 5.The view from roundabout: Threads of meaning in the construal of texture
  • 6.Conclusion and pointers to the future
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00048.aru
References (43)
References
Alarcos Llorach, Emilio. 1987. Estudios de Gramática Funcional del español, 3rd edn. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Arús-Hita, Jorge. 2006. Perspectiva sistémico-funcional de los usos de ‘se’ en español. Revista Signos 39(61). 131–159.Google Scholar
. 2017. Theme in Spanish. In Tom Bartlett & Gerard O’Grady (eds.), Routledge handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics, 194–212. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2021. Pushing the theory out of its comfort zone: The role of SPCA structure in English and Spanish. In Izaskun Elorza, Tom Bartlett & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), Lingua 261, special issue on Dynamicity and Contrast in Systemic Functional Linguistics. 102909.Google Scholar
. 2022. Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish casual conversation: A contrastive study. Language, Context and Text 4(2). 197–226. DOI logo
. Forthcoming. Theme as point of departure in English and Spanish academic writing and casual conversation: Towards a generalization. Submitted to Text and Talk.
Arús-Hita, Jorge, Julia Lavid & Lara Moratón. 2013. Annotating thematic features in English and Spanish: A contrastive corpus-based study. In Maite Taboada, Susana Doval Suárez & Elisa González Álvarez (eds.), Contrastive Discourse Analysis: Functional and corpus perspectives, 164–182. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Banks, David. 1995. There is a cleft in your sentence: Less common clause structures in scientific writing. Actes du 16e colloque du GERAS, 3–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The extent to which the passive voice is used in the scientific journal article, 1985–2015. Functional Linguistics 4(12). 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, Tom. 2016. Phasal dynamism and the unfolding of meaning as text. In Ben Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, English Text Construction 9(1). 143–164. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bowen, Neil & Nathan Thomas. 2020. Manipulating texture and cohesion in academic writing: A keystroke logging study. Journal of Second Language Writing 501. 100773. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Florence. 1997. Marked Theme as a heuristic for analysing text-type, text and genre. In Jordi Piqué & David J. Viera (eds.), Applied Linguistics: Theory and Practice in ESP, 45–79. Valencia: Universitat de València.Google Scholar
Downing, Angela. 1991. An Alternative approach to Theme: A systemic-functional perspective. Word 42(2). 119–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, John. 2004. Oxford Practice Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eggins, Suzanne. 2004. An introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Enkvist, N. E. 1973. Theme dynamics and style: An experiment. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 51. 127–135.Google Scholar
Gil, José María & Adolfo García. 2010. Transitividad, modo y tema en español: Un primer análisis en términos de la gramática de Cardiff. Revista Signos 43(72). 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gómez González, María de los Ángeles & Ana Patricia García Varela. 2014. Discourse-organizational patterns in English and Spanish: Some notes on the thematic management of news reports. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 27(1). 87–117. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
1988. On the ineffability of grammatical categories. In James D. Benson, Michael J. Cummings & William S. Greaves (eds.), Linguistics in a systemic perspective, 27–51. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2014. Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Jim R. Martin. 2003. Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney D. 1988. Constituency, multi-functionality and grammaticalization in Halliday’s functional grammar. Journal of Linguistics 241. 137–174. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1991. Further remarks on Halliday’s Functional Grammar: A reply to Matthiessen and Martin. Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 51. 75–130.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 1986. Systemic Grammar. Linguistics 241. 791–815.Google Scholar
Lavid, Julia, Jorge Arús-Hita & Juan R. Zamorano. 2010. Systemic Functional Grammar of Spanish: A contrastive study with English. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
López Meirama, Belén. 1997. La posición del sujeto en la cláusula monoactancial en español. Santiago de Compostela: Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. 1992. English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. More than what the clause is about: English Theme. In Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), Thematic development in English texts, 223–258. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 1992. A brief note on Huddleston’s reply to Matthiessen and Martin’s response to Huddleston’s review of Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar . Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 61. 185–195.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 1995. Lexicogrammatical cartography: English systems. Tokyo: International Language Sciences Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. & J. R. Martin. 1991. A response to Huddleston’s review of Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar . Occasional Papers in Systemic Linguistics 51. 5–74.Google Scholar
McCabe, Anne. 1999. Theme and thematic patterns in Spanish and English history texts. Birmingham: Aston University PhD thesis.
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Wilson. 2001. Corpus Linguistics, 2nd edn. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
MedCalc Software Ltd. 2022. Comparison of proportions calculator (Version 20.027). <[URL]> (Last accessed on 14 February 2022).
Moore, Nicholas. 2011. Modelling the flow of discourse in a corpus of written academic English. In Nicholas Groom (ed.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2011 Conference ‘Discourse and Corpus Linguistics’. <[URL]> (Last accessed on 3 May 2021).
Moyano, Estela. 2016. Theme in English and Spanish: Different means of realization for the same textual function. In Ben Clarke & Jorge Arús-Hita (eds.), The dynamicity of communication below, around and above the clause, Special issue of English Text Construction 9(1). 190–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2021. La función de Tema en español: Sus medios de realización desde la perspectiva trinocular de la Lingüística Sistémico-Funcional. Revista Signos 56(106). 487–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Wilfred W. Xuan. 2016. A survey of studies in systemic functional language description and typology. Functional Linguistics 3(8). < DOI logo> (Last accessed on 16 February 2021).Google Scholar
Quiroz, Beatriz. 2018. Negotiating interpersonal meanings in Spanish: Reasoning about mood. Functions of Language 25(1) (Special Issue on Interpersonal Meaning). 130–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ravelli, Louise J. 1995. A dynamic perspective: Implications for metafunctional interaction and an understanding of Theme. In Ruqaiya Hasan & Peter H. Fries (eds.), On Subject and Theme: A discourse functional perspective, Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science Series 41. 187–234. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson. 2009. Theme, subject and the unfolding of text. In Gail Forey & Geoff Thompson (eds.), Text type and texture, 45–69. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar