Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.68–88

Exploring the use of modality in EFL learners’ writing

| Shahrood University of Technology
| Shahrood University of Technology
| Shahrood University of Technology

Due to prevalence of formal analysis in language education, the implications of Systemic Functional Grammar has largely been ignored by materials and methods of language education. To illustrate the inadequacies of formal analysis and make a case for functional analysis and assessment of writing samples, this study aims at exploring the use of modality in a random sample of expository essays written in an EFL context. To this end, 20 expository essays, written by undergraduate students of English language and literature, were randomly obtained from writing instructors and professors teaching in the English department of Shahrood University of Technology (SUT), Iran. Leaners’ use of modality was then analyzed in line with the framework presented by Halliday & Matthiessen (2014). Analysis revealed learners’ lack of variation in the expression of uncertainties and doubts and as such lack of mastery over modality since they tended to express their opinions as implicit and as objective as possible. There seems to be a link between this problem and the dominance of formal analysis in teaching and assessing writing; hence, the findings of this study have clear implications for teaching instruction in this context and other similar contexts, where the implications of systemic functional grammar for language education seem to be ignored.

Keywords: interpersonal metafunction, modality, Systemic Functional Grammar (SFG), academic writing
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Review of related literature
    • 2.1Theoretical perspectives on modality
  • 3.Empirical findings on modality
  • 4.Purpose of the study
  • 5.Methodology
    • 5.1Research context
    • 5.2Research data
    • 5.3Data analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Interpersonal meaning from the perspective of modality type
    • 6.2Interpersonal meaning from the perspective of modality value
    • 6.3Distribution of each type of modality orientation
  • 7.Conclusion and implications
  • References
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00050.ost
References
Aijmer, Karin
2016 Modality and mood in functional linguistic approaches. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 495–513. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Axel-Tober, Katrin & Remus Gergel
2016 Modality and mood in formal syntactic approaches. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 473–494. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny & Egbert Fortuin
2016 Modality and mood in Cognitive Linguistics and Construction Grammar. In Jan Nuyts & Johan Van Der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 514–534. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bouhlal, Fatma, Marlise Horst & Juliane Martini
2018 Modality in ESL textbooks: Insights from a contrastive corpus-based analysis. The Canadian Modern Language Review / La revue canadienne des langues vivantes 74(2). 227–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L. & Suzanne Fleischman
(eds.) 1995 Modality in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace & Johanna Nichols
(eds.) 1986 Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat
2011 The definition of modality. In Adeline Patard & Frank Brisard (eds.), Cognitive approaches to tense, aspect, and epistemic modality, 21–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Roger
1986 Linguistic criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ge, Tianshuang
2015 The use of modal verbs to express hedging in student academic writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics 31. 37–46. [URL]. DOI logo
Halliday, M. A. K.
1970 Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3). 322–361.Google Scholar
1985 An introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
2014 Halliday’s introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heydarnia, Roghayeh & Nader Assadi-Aidinlou
2015 A comparative study of mood and modality in academic writing: Male vs. female authors of research articles in applied linguistics. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 6(6). 87–96.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
1998 Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken & Polly Tse
2004 Meta discourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics 25(2). 156–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karanasiou, Thaleia., & Marina Mattheoudakis
2017 The expression of epistemic modality in Greek EFL learners’ argumentative essays. (Unpublished M.A. thesis). School of English, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki.
Kongpetch, Saowadee & Atikhom Thienthong
2021 Use of core modal verbs in academic writing of Thai EFL students. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies 3(1). 277–291. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Xuyan & Chunyu Hu
2015 Epistemic modality in the argumentative essays of Chinese EFL learners. English Language Teaching 8(6). 20–31.Google Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mortelmans, Tanja
2010 Modality in cognitive linguistics. In Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 879–889. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagao, Akiko
2019 The SFL genre-based approach to writing in EFL contexts. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education 4(6). 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ochs, Elinor
1996 Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. In John J. Gumperz & Stephen C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 407–437. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olaniyan, Kazeem K. & Adeolu Adeniji
2015 Modality in statement of objectives in arts-based research article abstracts. British Journal of English Linguistics 3(1). 42–51.Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank. R.
2001 Mood and modality, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, Jean
2020 Stance and modals of obligation and necessity in academic writing. Register Studies 2(1). 102–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qian, Li
2017 A corpus-based study of modal verbs use in English writing by EFL learners. Canadian Social Science 13(11). 31–35.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985 A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica & Isabel Verdaguer
2009 Polysemous verbs and modality in native and non-native argumentative writing: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Studies 91. 209–219.Google Scholar
Shen, Qian & Yating Tao
2021 Stance markers in English medical research articles and newspaper opinion columns: A comparative corpus-based study. PLoS ONE 16(3). 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Geoff
2014 Introducing Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vázquez, Ignacio & Diana Giner
2008 Beyond mood and modality: Epistemic modality markers as hedges in research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 21(21). 171–190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, An, Shu-yuan Zheng & Guang-chun Ge
2015 Epistemic modality in English-median medical research articles: A systemic functional perspective. English for Specific Purposes 381. 1–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar