Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.89–111

Narrative discourse in TED Talks

| The Open University
This article investigates the extent to which TED talks can be considered a narrative register. This study analyses ‘narrative versus non-narrative discourse’ (Biber 1988) in a corpus of TED talks (n = 2483). TED talks were found to be typically non-narrative (−2.47 mean). However, there was a great degree of variation, with approximately 10% of talks (n = 257) classified as narrative. When TED talks were compared to registers in prior studies they were close to academic prose and presented a similar pattern in terms of disciplinary variation, with ‘soft’ disciplines closer to narratives. When textual data was examined, the average TED talk was found to weave narrative and descriptive elements, but were found to be more descriptive overall.
Keywords: TED Talks, Corpus Linguistics, Narrative Discourse, Multi-dimensional Analysis, Register Studies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Analysing narrative discourse
    • 2.2The TED Talk Corpus
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Narrative versus non-narrative dimension scores
    • 3.2Comparisons to other registers in prior research
    • 3.3The expression of narrative versus non-narrative discourse within TED talk texts
      • 3.3.1TED talks with high dimension scores
      • 3.3.2TED talks with low dimension scores
      • 3.3.3TED talks with average dimension scores
  • 4.Conclusion
    • 4.1Summary
    • 4.2Limitations
    • 4.3Implications
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00051.win
References (24)
References
Anderson, Chris. 2016. TED talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. London: Nicholas Brealy.Google Scholar
Baker, Lida, Laurie Blass, Jessica Williams, Lynn Bonesteel & Christien Lee. 2017. 21st Century Communication [textbook series]. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
Bértoli-Dutra, Patrícia. 2014. Multi-Dimensional analysis of pop songs. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 149–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. University language. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt. 2002. Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36(1). 9–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biglan, Anthony. 1973. The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3). 195–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bu, Han, Jeffrey Connor-Linton & Lifei Wang. 2020. Linguistic variation in the discourse of corporate annual reports: A multi-dimensional analysis. Discourse studies 22(6). 647–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Sugimoto, Mike Thewall, Vincent Larivière, Andrew Tsou, Philippe Mongeon & Benoit Macaluso 2013. Scientists popularizing science: Characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One 8(4). e62403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condi de Souza, Renata. 2014. Dimensions of variation in TIME magazine. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 177–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csomay, Eniko. 2005. Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education 15(3). 243–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dummet, Paul, Helen Stephenson, David Bohlke & Lewis Lansford. 2016–2018. Keynote [textbook series]. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
Gallo, Carmine. 2015. Talk like Ted. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany. 2011. More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2). 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iberri-Shea, Gina. 2011. Speaking in front of the class: A multi-dimensional comparison of university student public speech and university language. Classroom Discourse 2(2). 251–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karia, Akash. 2015. TED talks storytelling: 23 storytelling techniques from the best TED Talks. [URL]
Longhurst, Tim. 2008. The TED commandments e rules every speaker needs to know. Tim Longhurst’s Blog. <[URL]> (Last accessed 12 August 2020).
Mattiello, Elisa. 2017. The popularisation of science via TED talks. International Journal of Language Studies 11(4). 77–106.Google Scholar
Nadeem, Nahla. 2021. “Stories that are worth spreading”: A communicative model of TED talk narratives. Narrative Inquiry 31(2). 434–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nini, Andrea. 2019. The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues, 67–94. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sardinha, Tony Berber. 2014. 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 81–108. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul, Susan Hunston, Akira Murakami & Dominik Vajn. 2017. Multi-Dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2). 153–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yorke, John. 2013. Into the woods: How stories work and why we tell them. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar