Cover not available
Article published In:
English Text Construction
Vol. 15:1 (2022) ► pp.89–111

Narrative discourse in TED Talks

| The Open University

This article investigates the extent to which TED talks can be considered a narrative register. This study analyses ‘narrative versus non-narrative discourse’ (Biber 1988) in a corpus of TED talks (n = 2483). TED talks were found to be typically non-narrative (−2.47 mean). However, there was a great degree of variation, with approximately 10% of talks (n = 257) classified as narrative. When TED talks were compared to registers in prior studies they were close to academic prose and presented a similar pattern in terms of disciplinary variation, with ‘soft’ disciplines closer to narratives. When textual data was examined, the average TED talk was found to weave narrative and descriptive elements, but were found to be more descriptive overall.

Keywords: TED Talks, Corpus Linguistics, Narrative Discourse, Multi-dimensional Analysis, Register Studies
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Analysing narrative discourse
    • 2.2The TED Talk Corpus
  • 3.Findings and discussion
    • 3.1Narrative versus non-narrative dimension scores
    • 3.2Comparisons to other registers in prior research
    • 3.3The expression of narrative versus non-narrative discourse within TED talk texts
      • 3.3.1TED talks with high dimension scores
      • 3.3.2TED talks with low dimension scores
      • 3.3.3TED talks with average dimension scores
  • 4.Conclusion
    • 4.1Summary
    • 4.2Limitations
    • 4.3Implications
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 27 March 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.00051.win
References
Anderson, Chris
2016 TED talks: The official TED guide to public speaking. London: Nicholas Brealy.Google Scholar
Baker, Lida, Laurie Blass, Jessica Williams, Lynn Bonesteel & Christien Lee
2017 21st Century Communication [textbook series]. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
Bértoli-Dutra, Patrícia
2014 Multi-Dimensional analysis of pop songs. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 149–176. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
1988 Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 University language. Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2009 Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad, Randi Reppen, Pat Byrd & Marie Helt
2002 Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 36(1). 9–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biglan, Anthony
1973 The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3). 195–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bu, Han, Jeffrey Connor-Linton & Lifei Wang
2020 Linguistic variation in the discourse of corporate annual reports: A multi-dimensional analysis. Discourse studies 22(6). 647–677. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassidy, Sugimoto, Mike Thewall, Vincent Larivière, Andrew Tsou, Philippe Mongeon & Benoit Macaluso
2013 Scientists popularizing science: Characteristics and impact of TED talk presenters. PLoS One 8(4). e62403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Condi de Souza, Renata
2014 Dimensions of variation in TIME magazine. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 177–196. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csomay, Eniko
2005 Linguistic variation within university classroom talk: A corpus-based perspective. Linguistics and Education 15(3). 243–74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dummet, Paul, Helen Stephenson, David Bohlke & Lewis Lansford
2016–2018 Keynote [textbook series]. Boston, MA: National Geographic Learning.Google Scholar
Gallo, Carmine
2015 Talk like Ted. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Griffin.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany
2011 More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora 8(2). 153–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iberri-Shea, Gina
2011 Speaking in front of the class: A multi-dimensional comparison of university student public speech and university language. Classroom Discourse 2(2). 251–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Karia, Akash
2015 TED talks storytelling: 23 storytelling techniques from the best TED Talks. [URL]
Longhurst, Tim
2008 The TED commandments e rules every speaker needs to know. Tim Longhurst’s Blog. [URL] (Last accessed 12 August 2020).
Mattiello, Elisa
2017 The popularisation of science via TED talks. International Journal of Language Studies 11(4). 77–106.Google Scholar
Nadeem, Nahla
2021 “Stories that are worth spreading”: A communicative model of TED talk narratives. Narrative Inquiry 31(2). 434–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nini, Andrea
2019 The multi-dimensional analysis tagger. In Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis: Research methods and current issues, 67–94. London: Bloomsbury Academic. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sardinha, Tony Berber
2014 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In Tony Berber Sardinha, Marcia Veirano Pinto & Douglas Biber (eds.), Multi-Dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber, 81–108. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Paul, Susan Hunston, Akira Murakami & Dominik Vajn
2017 Multi-Dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(2). 153–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yorke, John
2013 Into the woods: How stories work and why we tell them. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar