To be specified published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 10:1 (2017) ► pp. 620

Full-text

Remodelling homologies
References

References

Baker, Noel
1997Hard Core Road Show: A Screenwriter’s Diary. Toronto: Anansi.Google Scholar
Bassnett, Susan
2006Translating genre. In Genre Matters: Essays in Theory and Criticism, Garin Dowd, Lesley Stevenson & Jeremy Strong (eds). Bristol: Intellect, 85–95.Google Scholar
Behlmer, Rudy
1985Inside Warner Bros.: 1935–1951. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Beulow, George J.
1990Originality, genius, plagiarism in English criticism of the eighteenth century. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music 21 (2): 117–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boozer, Jack
2008The screenplay and authorship in adaptation. In Authorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 1–34.Google Scholar
Bortolotti, Gary R. & Linda Hutcheon
2007On the origin of adaptations: Rethinking fidelity discourse and ‘success’ – biologically. New Literary History 38: 443–458. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn, Jørgen
2013Dialogizing adaptation studies: From one-way transport to a dialogic two-way process. In Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn, Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 69–88.Google Scholar
Collard, Christophe
2011Adaptation in transition: A semiology-based assessment of the ‘fidelity’ debate. English Text Construction 4 (1): 18–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Travelling at the speed of thought: John Jesurun in conversation with Christophe Collard. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art 115: 12–23.Google Scholar
Defays, Daniel
1997Numbo: A study in cognition and recognition. In Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies: Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought, Douglas Hofstadter (ed.). London: Penguin, 131–154.Google Scholar
Dewey, John
1979 [1934]Art as Experience. New York: Paragon.Google Scholar
Diehl, Karen
2005Once upon an adaptation: Traces of the authorial on film. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam: Rodopi, 89–124.Google Scholar
Eco, Umberto
1986Semiotics and the Philosophy of Language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eliot, Thomas Stearns
1921The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. New York: Walter A. Knopf.Google Scholar
1922The Waste Land. New York: Boni & Liverlight..Google Scholar
Elleström, Lars
2013Adaptation within the field of media transformations. In Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn, Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 113–132.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kamilla
2003Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forbus, Kenneth D.
2001Exploring analogy in the large. In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 23–58.Google Scholar
Garrett, Greg
1995The many faces of Mildred Pierce: A case study of adaptation and the studio system. Literature/Film Quarterly 29 (4): 287–292.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine
2012How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: Chicago University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helbo, André
2006Signes du spectacle: Des arts vivants aux médias. Brussels: PIE-Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hirose, Naoya 2002An ecological approach to embodiment and cognition. Cognitive Systems Research 3 (3): 289–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoopes, Roy
1982Cain. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Douglas
2001Analogy as the core of cognition. In The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, Dedre Gentner, Keith J. Holyoak & Boicho N. Kokinov (eds). Cambridge: MIT Press, 499–538.Google Scholar
Hutcheon, Linda
2011Moving forward: The next stage in adaptation studies. In Adaptation and American Studies: Perspectives on Research and Teaching, Nassim Winnie Balestrini (ed.). Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag Winter, 213–218.Google Scholar
Jesurun, John
1993Breaking the relentless spool of film unrolling. Felix 1 (3): 64–69.Google Scholar
1997Mildred Pierce remake/remodel. Index November: 58–63.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno
2005Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
LaValley, Albert J.
2008 Mildred Pierce: A troublesome property to script. In Authorship in Film Adaptation, Jack Boozer (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 35–62.Google Scholar
Leitch, Thomas
2003Twelve fallacies in contemporary adaptation theory. Criticism 45 (2): 149–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013When adaptations go bad. Plenary lecture given at the 8th Annual Conference of the Association of Adaptation Studies (AAS) “Disturbing Adaptations” , Linnaeus University, 27 September 2013.
Moss, Stephen
2005A history of plagiarism (not my own work). The Guardian 23 November: G2/2.Google Scholar
Murray, Simone
2012Materializing adaptation theory. In Film and Literature: An Introduction and Reader, Timothy Corrigan (ed.). 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 365–384.Google Scholar
Naremore, James
2000Film and the reign of adaptation. In Film Adaptation, James Naremore (ed.). London: Athlone, 1–16.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. Barton
2004The sociological turn of adaptation studies: The example of film noir . In A Companion to Literature and Film, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 258–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Saunders
1958Collected Papers Volume 2. C. Harthorne & P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schober, Regina
2013Adaptation as connection: Transmediality reconsidered. In Adaptation Studies: New Challenges, New Directions, Jørgen Bruhn, Anne Gjelsvik & Eirik Frisvold Hanssen (eds). London: Bloomsbury, 89–112.Google Scholar
Schrader, Paul
2005Notes on film noir . In Film Genre Reader III, Barry Keith Grant (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press, 229–242.Google Scholar
Stam, Robert
2007The theory and practice of film adaptation. In Literature and Film: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Film Adaptation, Robert Stam & Alessandra Raengo (eds). Oxford: Blackwell, 1–52.Google Scholar
Walkenhorst, Birgit
2005Intermedialität und Wahrnehmung: Untersuchungen zur Regiearbeit von John Jesurun und Robert Lepage. Marburg: Tectum.Google Scholar