To be specified published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 10:1 (2017) ► pp. 59–77

Travelling through the centuries

The intertextual relationship between Shakespeare in Love, Molière and Young Goethe in Love

| University of Granada
The paper analyses the influence of John Madden’s biopic Shakespeare in Love (GB/USA, 1998) on Molière (FR, 2007) and Young Goethe in Love (GER, 2010) by having a closer look at the intertextual relationship between the films. For this, it considers external and internal connections, referring to intertexts for the promotion and marketing as well as the use of content-based conventions for biopics on writers, literary sources and anachronisms. The analysis reveals that, although the French and German films take Shakespeare in Love as a source of inspiration, they rewrite the approach and transform it for an individual representation of their national subjects. This double effect points to a different, alternative strategy for adapting the literary life of the canonical author.
Keywords: biopics, film adaptation, film biography, intertextuality, writers


This article is currently available as a sample article.

Published online: 15 June 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.1.04ste

Full-text

Travelling through the centuries
References

References

Agger, Gunhild
1999 Intertextuality revisited: Dialogues and negotiations in media studies. Canadian Aesthetics Journal 4. 〈http://​www​.uqtr​.ca​/AE​/vol​_4​/gunhild​.htm〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Aragay, Mireia 2005 Introduction – Reflection to refraction: Adaptation studies then and now. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 11–34.Google Scholar
Aragay, Mireia & Gemma López
2005 Inf(l)ecting Pride and Prejudice: Dialogism, intertextuality, and adaptation. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 201–219.Google Scholar
Cano López, Marina & María García-Periago
2008 Becoming Shakespeare and Jane Austen in love: An intertextual dialogue between two biopics. Jane Austen Society of North America 29 (1). 〈http://​www​.jasna​.org​/persuasions​/on​-line​/vol29no1​/cano​-garcia​.html〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Carretero González, Margarita & María Elena Rodríguez Martín
2012 Life through a lens: Writers and the biopic. In Many-Coated Men: Studies in Honour of José Antonio Díaz López and Ian Maccandless, Celia Wallhead & Isabel María Andrés Cuevas (eds). Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada, 21–27.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kamilla
2003 Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franssen, Paul J. C. M.
2014 Shakespeare’s life on film and television: Shakespeare in Love and A Waste of Shame . In Adaptation, Intermediality and the British Celebrity Biopic, Maddalena Pennacchia & Márta Minier (eds). Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 101–113.Google Scholar
Freeman Loftis, Sonya
2011 A less than original screenplay: Bernard Shaw’s influence on Shakespeare in Love . South Atlantic Review 76 (3): 111–127.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von
2001 Faust. Trans. Walter Arndt. Cyrus Hamlin (ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Higson, Andrew
2013 Brit-lit biopics, 1990–2010. In The Writer on Film: Screening Literary Authorship, Judith Buchanan (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 106–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez Aguilar, Elisa
2013 With tears and a journey: Recreating Shakespeare’s life on screen. Master dissertation, University of Granada. 〈http://​digibug​.ugr​.es​/bitstream​/10481​/27842​/1​/MASTER%20DISSERTATION%20JIMENEZ%20AGUILAR​.pdf〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Kiefer, Klaus H.
2013 Weltliteratur zu Pferde - Philipp Stölzls Film ‘Goethe!’. Goethezeitportal 11. 〈http://​www​.goethezeitportal​.de​/fileadmin​/PDF​/db​/wiss​/goethe​/kiefer​_weltliteratur​_zu​_pferde​.pdf〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).
Klett, Elizabeth
2001  Shakespeare in Love and the end(s) of history. In Retrovisions: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, Deborah Cartmell, Ian Q. Hunter & Irmela Whelehan (eds). London: Pluto Press, 25–40.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas
2007 William Shakespeare, filmmaker. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen, Deborah Cartmell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney
2002 Shakespeare Remains. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Stephen J.
1998 Shakespearean Intertextuality. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Madden, John
1998 Shakespeare in Love. Universal Pictures, Bedford Falls Productions, Miramax.Google Scholar
Moine, Raphaëlle
2014 The contemporary French biopic in national and international contexts. In The Biopic in Contemporary Film Culture, Tom Brown & Belén Vidal (eds). New York and London: Routledge, 52–67.Google Scholar
Oßwald, Dieter 2010 Goethe in Love: Gespräch mit Philipp Stölzl über seinen Film. Thüringer Allgemeine Zeitung. 〈http://​www​.thueringer​-allgemeine​.de​/web​/zgt​/kultur​/detail​/-​/specific​/Goethe​-in​-Love​-Gespraech​-mit​-Philipp​-Stoelzl​-ueber​-seinen​-Film​-1846012932〉 (Last acccessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Pardo García, Pedro Javier
2005 Beyond adaptation: Frankenstein’s postmodern progeny. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 223–242.Google Scholar
Peacock, Noel
2012 Molière au panthéon cinématographique: du «Verfremdungseffekt» à Shakespeare in Love . In Les Ombres de Molière, Martial Poirson (ed.). Paris: Armand Colin, 471–487.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Martín, María Elena
2013  Psycho (1960) revisited: Intertextuality and refraction. In Peeping Through the Holes: Twenty-first Century Essays on Psycho, E.M. Olivares Merino & J.A. Olivares Merino (eds). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 167–189.Google Scholar
Shachar, Hila
2013 Authorial histories: The historical film and the literary biopic. In A Companion to the Historical Film, Robert A. Rosenstone & Constantin Parvulesu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 199–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stam, Robert
2000 Beyond fidelity: The dialogics of adaptation. In Film Adaptation, James Naremore (ed.). London: The Athlone Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Stölzl, Philipp
2010 Goethe! Warner Bros. Pictures Germany.Google Scholar
Tirard, Laurent
2007 Molière. Fidélités Productions.Google Scholar
Todd, F. Davis & Kenneth Womack
2004 Reading (and writing) the ethics of authorship: Shakespeare in Love as postmodern metanarrative. Literature/Film quarterly 32 (2): 153–162.Google Scholar