To be specified published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 10:1 (2017) ► pp. 5977

Full-text

Travelling through the centuries
References

References

Agger, Gunhild
1999Intertextuality revisited: Dialogues and negotiations in media studies. Canadian Aesthetics Journal 4. 〈http://​www​.uqtr​.ca​/AE​/vol​_4​/gunhild​.htm〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Aragay, Mireia 2005Introduction – Reflection to refraction: Adaptation studies then and now. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 11–34.Google Scholar
Aragay, Mireia & Gemma López
2005Inf(l)ecting Pride and Prejudice: Dialogism, intertextuality, and adaptation. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 201–219.Google Scholar
Cano López, Marina & María García-Periago
2008Becoming Shakespeare and Jane Austen in love: An intertextual dialogue between two biopics. Jane Austen Society of North America 29 (1). 〈http://​www​.jasna​.org​/persuasions​/on​-line​/vol29no1​/cano​-garcia​.html〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Carretero González, Margarita & María Elena Rodríguez Martín
2012Life through a lens: Writers and the biopic. In Many-Coated Men: Studies in Honour of José Antonio Díaz López and Ian Maccandless, Celia Wallhead & Isabel María Andrés Cuevas (eds). Granada: Editorial Universidad de Granada, 21–27.Google Scholar
Elliott, Kamilla
2003Rethinking the Novel/Film Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Franssen, Paul J. C. M.
2014Shakespeare’s life on film and television: Shakespeare in Love and A Waste of Shame . In Adaptation, Intermediality and the British Celebrity Biopic, Maddalena Pennacchia & Márta Minier (eds). Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, 101–113.Google Scholar
Freeman Loftis, Sonya
2011A less than original screenplay: Bernard Shaw’s influence on Shakespeare in Love . South Atlantic Review 76 (3): 111–127.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von
2001Faust. Trans. Walter Arndt. Cyrus Hamlin (ed.). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Higson, Andrew
2013Brit-lit biopics, 1990–2010. In The Writer on Film: Screening Literary Authorship, Judith Buchanan (ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 106–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jiménez Aguilar, Elisa
2013With tears and a journey: Recreating Shakespeare’s life on screen. Master dissertation, University of Granada. 〈http://​digibug​.ugr​.es​/bitstream​/10481​/27842​/1​/MASTER%20DISSERTATION%20JIMENEZ%20AGUILAR​.pdf〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Kiefer, Klaus H.
2013Weltliteratur zu Pferde - Philipp Stölzls Film ‘Goethe!’. Goethezeitportal 11. 〈http://​www​.goethezeitportal​.de​/fileadmin​/PDF​/db​/wiss​/goethe​/kiefer​_weltliteratur​_zu​_pferde​.pdf〉 (Last accessed on 5 November 2016).
Klett, Elizabeth
2001 Shakespeare in Love and the end(s) of history. In Retrovisions: Reinventing the Past in Film and Fiction, Deborah Cartmell, Ian Q. Hunter & Irmela Whelehan (eds). London: Pluto Press, 25–40.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas
2007William Shakespeare, filmmaker. In The Cambridge Companion to Literature on Screen, Deborah Cartmell (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Courtney
2002Shakespeare Remains. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Stephen J.
1998Shakespearean Intertextuality. London: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Madden, John
1998Shakespeare in Love. Universal Pictures, Bedford Falls Productions, Miramax.Google Scholar
Moine, Raphaëlle
2014The contemporary French biopic in national and international contexts. In The Biopic in Contemporary Film Culture, Tom Brown & Belén Vidal (eds). New York and London: Routledge, 52–67.Google Scholar
Oßwald, Dieter 2010Goethe in Love: Gespräch mit Philipp Stölzl über seinen Film. Thüringer Allgemeine Zeitung. 〈http://​www​.thueringer​-allgemeine​.de​/web​/zgt​/kultur​/detail​/-​/specific​/Goethe​-in​-Love​-Gespraech​-mit​-Philipp​-Stoelzl​-ueber​-seinen​-Film​-1846012932〉 (Last acccessed on 5 November 2016).Google Scholar
Pardo García, Pedro Javier
2005Beyond adaptation: Frankenstein’s postmodern progeny. In Books in Motion: Adaptation, Intertextuality, Authorship, Mireia Aragay (ed.). Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi, 223–242.Google Scholar
Peacock, Noel
2012Molière au panthéon cinématographique: du «Verfremdungseffekt» à Shakespeare in Love . In Les Ombres de Molière, Martial Poirson (ed.). Paris: Armand Colin, 471–487.Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Martín, María Elena
2013 Psycho (1960) revisited: Intertextuality and refraction. In Peeping Through the Holes: Twenty-first Century Essays on Psycho, E.M. Olivares Merino & J.A. Olivares Merino (eds). Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 167–189.Google Scholar
Shachar, Hila
2013Authorial histories: The historical film and the literary biopic. In A Companion to the Historical Film, Robert A. Rosenstone & Constantin Parvulesu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 199–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stam, Robert
2000Beyond fidelity: The dialogics of adaptation. In Film Adaptation, James Naremore (ed.). London: The Athlone Press, 1–18.Google Scholar
Stölzl, Philipp
2010Goethe! Warner Bros. Pictures Germany.Google Scholar
Tirard, Laurent
2007Molière. Fidélités Productions.Google Scholar
Todd, F. Davis & Kenneth Womack
2004Reading (and writing) the ethics of authorship: Shakespeare in Love as postmodern metanarrative. Literature/Film quarterly 32 (2): 153–162.Google Scholar