There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage
Usage-based grammars have become increasingly prominent in recent years. In these theories usage is construed quantitatively and serves as a circumstance for the emergence and development of grammar. This paper argues that usage can go deeper than this, and may become a component of the semiotic resources of a language and a part of grammar. However, this semioticisation is restricted to interpersonal grammar, those semiotic resources of grammar that construe interpersonal meaning. Three apparently unrelated grammatical phenomena – optionality of grammatical markers, insubordination, and a range of repetition-based constructions – are shown to be unified by the notions of grammaticalised usage and interpersonal grammar. This has implications for the nature of interpersonal grammar: it represents the codification of the triadic actional frame, the basis of which is the idea that action on an interlocutor is effected via action on linguistic units.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Three domains of grammar where usage may be fundamental
- 2.1Optionality of grammatical markers
- 2.2Insubordination
- 2.3Repetition-based constructions
- 3.Usage as a grammatical system
- 3.1The limitations of unit and relational descriptions
- 3.2Usage as interpersonal grammar
- 3.3The range and extent of usage in grammar
- 4.A reconsideration of interpersonal grammar
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References
Austin, John L
1962 How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
2001 Register variation: A corpus approach. In
The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (
Blackwell Handbooks in Linguistics),
Deborah Schiffrin,
Deborah Tannen &
Heidi E. Hamilton (eds). Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell, 175–197.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, Leonard
1973 [1933] Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight
1968 Entailment and the meaning of structures.
Glossa 21: 119–128.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight
1972 That’s That (Janua Lingarum Studia Memoriae Nicolai van Wijk Dedicata). The Hague and Paris: Mouton.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight
1987 The remarkable double IS.
English Today 91: 39–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
1978 Universals of language usage: Politeness phenomena. In
Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction,
Esther Goody (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 56–310.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bybee, Joan
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Christie, Agatha
1979 [1933] Sad Cypress. London: Pan.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H
2016 Depicting as a method of communication.
Psychological Review 123 (3): 324–347.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, Herbert H. & Richard J. Gerrig
1990 Quotations as demonstrations.
Language 661: 764–805.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Comrie, Bernard
1981 The Languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppock, Elizabeth & Laura Staum
2004 Origin of the English double-is construction. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University. Available at:
[URL] (Last accessed on 3 June 2017).
Coupe, Alexander R
2011 On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland.
Linguistics in the Tibeto-Burman Area 34 (2): 21–47.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuenca, Maria Josep
2007 Repetició consecutiva i idiomaticitat.
Zeitschrift für Katalanistik 201: 189–219.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Curme, George O
1931 A Grammar of the English Language: Syntax, Vol. 31. Boston, DC: Heath and Company.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas
2007 Insubordination and its uses. In
Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations,
Irina Nikolaeva (ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 366–431.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Evans, Nicholas
2009 Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Lecture given at the conference
Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change
, Osaka, March 2009.
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
(eds) 2016b Insubordination (
Typological Studies in Language 115). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fillmore, Charles J
1988 The mechanisms of ‘Construction Grammar’.
Berkeley Linguistic Society 141: 35–55.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ghomeshi, Jila, Ray Jackendoff, Nicole Rosen & Kevin Russell
2004 Contrastive focus reduplication in English: The salad-salad paper.
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 221: 307–357.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goldberg, Adele E
1995 Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gosden, Chris
2003 Prehistory: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H. Paul
1989 Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John
1980 The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation.
Language 561: 515–540.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haiman, John
1997 Repetition and identity.
Lingua 1001: 57–70.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K
1979 Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In
Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays offered to William Haas,
D.J. Allerton,
Edward Carney &
David Holdcroft (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–79.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, M.A.K
1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 1st ed. London: Arnold.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hand, David J
2016 Measurement: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
2016 On insubordination and cooptation. In
Insubordination (
Typological Studies in Language 115),
Nicholas Evans &
Honoré Watanabe (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39–63.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hobson, Peter
2004 The Cradle of Thought: Exploring the Origins of Thinking. London: Pan Books.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hockett, Charles F
1960 The origin of speech.
Scientific American 2031: 88–96.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ishikawa, Minako
1991 Iconicity in discourse: The case of repetition.
Text 11 (4): 553–580.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeger, T. Florian
2006 Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Jaeger, T. Florian
2010 Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density.
Cognitive Psychology 611: 23–62.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnstone, Barbara
(ed.) 1994a Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 11 (
Advances in Discourse Processes 47). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnstone, Barbara
(ed.) 1994b Repetition in Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, Vol. 21 (
Advances in Discourse Processes 48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W
1990 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar (
Cognitive Linguistics Research 1). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Langacker, Ronald W
1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Volume II: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C
1992 [1983] Pragmatics (
Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, Stephen C
2000 Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature (Language, Speech, and Communication). Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lilja, Niina
2014 Partial repetitions as other-initiations of repair in second language talk: Re-establishing understanding and doing learning.
Journal of Pragmatics 711: 98–116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Massam, Diane
1999 Thing is constructions: The thing is, is what’s the right analysis? English Language and Linguistics 3 (2): 335–352.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McConvell, Patrick
1988 To be or double be? Current changes in the English copula.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 8 (2): 287–305.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
1989 Phrase fracturing in Gooniyandi. In
Configurationality: The Typology of Asymmetries,
László Marácz &
Pieter Muysken (eds). Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 207–222.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
1994 The grammar of reported speech and thought in Gooniyandi.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 14 (1): 63–92.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
1995 Ja hear that didja?: Interrogative tags in Australian English.
Te Reo 381: 3–35.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
1997 Semiotic Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
1998 “Optional” ergative marking in Gooniyandi revisited: Implications to the theory of marking.
Leuvense Bijdragen 871: 491–534.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2006a Repetition in Gooniyandi narrative. Paper presented at Second European Workshop on Australian Languages: Narrative and Grammar, Somlószöllös, 14-16 September 2006.
McGregor, William B
2006b Focal and optional ergative marking in Warrwa (Kimberley, Western Australia).
Lingua 116 (4): 393–423.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2007 Ergative marking of intransitive subjects in Warrwa.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 27 (2): 201–229.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2010 Optional ergative case marking systems in a typological-semiotic perspective.
Lingua 120 (7): 1610–1636.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2013a Optionality in grammar and language use.
Linguistics 51 (6): 1147–1204.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2013b There are existential constructions and existential constructions: Presumption invoking existentials in English.
Folia Linguistica 47 (1): 139–181.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2013c Some unusual clause types in Shua. Paper presented at Final KBA Meeting, Aarhus, 8-9 April 2013.
McGregor, William B
2015a Four counter-presumption constructions in Shua (Khoe-Kwadi, Botswana).
Lingua 1581: 54–75.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McGregor, William B
2015b Optional accusative marking in Shua. Paper presented at Variation and asymmetries in case-marking workshop, Canberra, 31 July 2015.
Mithun, Marianne
2008 The extension of dependency beyond the sentence.
Language 841: 69–119.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Persson, Gunnar
1974 Repetition in English. Part I: Sequential Repetition (
Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, Studia Anglistica Upsaliensia 21). Uppsala: Universitetsbiblioteket.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pike, Kenneth L
1959 Language as particle, wave, and field.
The Texas Quarterly 2 (2): 37–54.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rumsey, Alan L
2010 ‘Optional’ ergativity and the framing of reported speech.
Lingua 1201: 1652–1676.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2013 Is usage more than usage after all? The case of English not that.
Linguistics 51 (1): 75–116.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaumyan, Sebastian
1987 A Semiotic Theory of Language. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Simon, Horst J. & Heike Wiese
(eds) 2011 Expecting the Unexpected: Exceptions in Grammar (
Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs 216). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah
1987 Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk.
Language 631: 574–605.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue and Imagery in Conversational Discourse (
Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 6). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
1991 The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer that in conversational English.
Journal of Pragmatics 151: 237–251.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
1999 The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2003 Constructing a Language: A Usage-based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2008 Origins of Human Communication (The Jean Nicod Lectures). Cambridge, MA and London: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomasello, Michael
2014 A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
2009 On the persistence of grammar in discourse formulas: A variationist study.
Linguistics 47 (1): 1–43.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valenzuela, Javier, Joseph Hilferty & Mar Garachana
van der Voort, Hein
2003 Reduplication of person markers in Kwaza.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 351: 65–94.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, Sarah D’Hertefelt & An Van linden
Wierzbicka, Anna
1987 Boys will be boys: ‘Radical semantics’ vs. ‘radical pragmatics’.
Language 631: 95–114.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw
(eds) 2010a Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory (
Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 45). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw
(eds) 2010b Rara & Rarissima: Documenting the Fringes of Linguistic Diversity (
Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 46). Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
McGregor, William B.
2019.
Reported speech as a dedicated grammatical domain – and why defenestration should not be thrown out the window.
Linguistic Typology 23:1
► pp. 207 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.