Article published in:
Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin DavidseEdited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 199–232
There’s grammar and there’s grammar just as there’s usage and there’s usage
William B. McGregor | Aarhus University
Usage-based grammars have become increasingly prominent in recent years. In these theories usage is construed quantitatively and serves as a circumstance for the emergence and development of grammar. This paper argues that usage can go deeper than this, and may become a component of the semiotic resources of a language and a part of grammar. However, this semioticisation is restricted to interpersonal grammar, those semiotic resources of grammar that construe interpersonal meaning. Three apparently unrelated grammatical phenomena – optionality of grammatical markers, insubordination, and a range of repetition-based constructions – are shown to be unified by the notions of grammaticalised usage and interpersonal grammar. This has implications for the nature of interpersonal grammar: it represents the codification of the triadic actional frame, the basis of which is the idea that action on an interlocutor is effected via action on linguistic units.
Keywords: grammatical optionality, insubordination, interpersonal grammar, repetition, triadic actional frame, usage
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.02mcg
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.02mcg
References
References
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad
Brown, Penelope & Stephen Levinson
Clark, Herbert H.
Coppock, Elizabeth & Laura Staum
2004 Origin of the English double-is construction. Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University. Available at: http://www.casasanto.com/laura/documents/doubleis.pdf (Last accessed on 3 June 2017).
Coupe, Alexander R.
Cristofaro, Sonia
Cuenca, Maria Josep
Curme, George O.
Delbecque, Nicole
Evans, Nicholas
2009 Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Lecture given at the conference
Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change
, Osaka, March 2009.
Evans, Nicholas & Honoré Watanabe
Fillmore, Charles J.
Ghomeshi, Jila, Ray Jackendoff, Nicole Rosen & Kevin Russell
Givón, Talmy
Goldberg, Adele E.
Gosden, Chris
Gras, Pedro
Halliday, M.A.K.
1979 Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions. In Function and Context in Linguistic Analysis: Essays offered to William Haas, D.J. Allerton, Edward Carney & David Holdcroft (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57–79.
Hand, David J.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck & Tania Kuteva
Jaeger, T. Florian
2006 Redundancy and syntactic reduction in spontaneous speech. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Johnstone, Barbara
Langacker, Ronald W.
Levinson, Stephen C.
Lilja, Niina
Massam, Diane
McConvell, Patrick
McGregor, William B.
2006a Repetition in Gooniyandi narrative. Paper presented at Second European Workshop on Australian Languages: Narrative and Grammar, Somlószöllös, 14-16 September 2006.
2013c Some unusual clause types in Shua. Paper presented at Final KBA Meeting, Aarhus, 8-9 April 2013.
2015b Optional accusative marking in Shua. Paper presented at Variation and asymmetries in case-marking workshop, Canberra, 31 July 2015.
Persson, Gunnar
Rumsey, Alan L.
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
Schwenter, Scott A.
Shaumyan, Sebastian
Simon, Horst J. & Heike Wiese
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac
Tomasello, Michael
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
Valenzuela, Javier, Joseph Hilferty & Mar Garachana
van der Voort, Hein
Verstraete, Jean-Christophe, Sarah D’Hertefelt & An Van linden
Wierzbicka, Anna
Wohlgemuth, Jan & Michael Cysouw
Cited by
Cited by other publications
McGregor, William B.
McGregor, William B.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 january 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.