Absolute quantifiers (e.g. many, few, three) have adjectival uses, but when initial they function as grounding elements: like demonstratives, articles, and relative quantifiers (e.g. all, most, every), they indicate the epistemic status of the nominal referent. This ambivalence is due to their being intermediate, having semantic affinities with both categories but being marginal with respect to each. The dual role of absolute quantifiers is readily described in Cognitive Grammar, given its dynamic view of meaning as consisting in semantic functions (interactive tasks to be fulfilled). These functions belong to the symbolic assemblies constituting language structure; they are fundamental, the role of lexicon and grammar being to effect their implementation. More schematic functions –such as grounding –are independent of any particular implementation. In the absence of a dedicated grounding element, absolute quantifiers assume that function through a conventional pattern of implicit functional augmentation (a common type of construction).
2012Same-except: A domain-general cognitive relation and how language expresses it. Language 881: 305–340.
Davidse, Kristin
2004The interaction of quantification and identification in English determiners. In Language, Culture and Mind, Michel Achard & Suzanne Kemmer (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 507–533.
2010Meaning in Mind and Society: A Functional Contribution to the Social Turn in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin and New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kirsner, Robert S.
1993From meaning to message in two theories: Cognitive and Saussurean views of the Modern Dutch demonstratives. In Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (Cognitive Linguistics Research 3), Richard A. Geiger & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 81–114.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1991Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
1997Constituency, dependency, and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 81: 1–32.
2005Dynamicity, fictivity, and scanning: The imaginative basis of logic and linguistic meaning. In Grounding Cognition: The Role of Perception and Action in Memory, Language and Thinking, Diane Pecher & Rolf A. Zwaan (eds). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 164–197.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2008Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2009Investigations in Cognitive Grammar. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
2013The indefinite article in complex quantifiers. In Language and the Creative Mind, Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancygier & Jennifer Hinnell (eds). Stanford: CSLI Publications, 65–81.
2023. Determiners of Existent NPs in the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 123 ff.
2023. Structural Assemblies and Semantics of the Four Existential Constructions with Relative Clause. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 75 ff.
2023. Different Antecedent–Relative Clause Relations. In Specificational and Presentational There-Clefts, ► pp. 55 ff.
Kratochvílová, Dana
2023. Epistemic modality and grounding: constructions expressing positive epistemic judgement in Spanish and Italian from the perspective of cognitive grammar (with particular reference to the verbs credere and creer). Probus 35:2 ► pp. 327 ff.
Passos, Hayat & Maíra Avelar
2021. A articulação entre advérbio e aspecto Uma proposta cognitivista e multimodal. Diacrítica 35:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
2017. Favourite puzzles. English Text Construction 10:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.