Article published in:
Grammar, usage and discourse: Functional studies offered to Kristin DavidseEdited by Lieven Vandelanotte, Wout Van Praet and Lieselotte Brems
[English Text Construction 10:2] 2017
► pp. 274–297
Theme and prosody
Redundancy or meaning making?
Gerard O’Grady | Cardiff University
In a series of extremely influential articles published in the 1960s, Halliday illustrated that what the Prague School labelled as Theme was formed out of two separate but related systems which he labelled Theme and Information (1967a & b). However, as Information is a system grounded in spoken language, this separation has had the unfortunate consequence of prioritising the study of Theme in written language. The Thematic structure of spoken language and especially the interplay of Theme and intonation has been consequently neglected. The prosodic system of Key (Brazil 1997) functions like Theme to ground a message in its local context and signal how it is to be developed. This study, by uniquely examining the interplay between Theme and Key, is able to identify a number of novel meanings, the most significant of which is a focus on the enabling of Interpersonal meanings. By so doing, it illustrates that the full semogenetic meaning making potential of Theme, as an unfolding orientating device in spoken discourse, can only be revealed by examining the prosodic realisation of the Theme choices.
Keywords: interpersonal meaning, Key, prosody, spoken discourse, Theme
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: What does Theme do?
- 2.What is Theme?
- 3.Prosody, Theme and Key
- 4.The corpus
- 5.Discussion: The relation between high Key and marked/unmarked Theme
- 5.1Category A: Opening of turn
- 5.2Category B: A new paratone
- 5.3Category C: Unexpected direction
- 5.4Category D: To project contrast or specify an individual or action
- 5.5Category E: Direct attention towards the consequences of a future action
- 5.6Category H: Assessment of desirability
- 6.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
Published online: 19 October 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr
https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.10.2.05ogr
References
Berry, Margaret
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
Brazil, David
Daneš, František
Davidse, Kristin
Downing, Angela
Firbas, Jan
Forey, Gail & Nicholas Sampson
Fries, Peter H.
Glaser, Barney G. & Anselm L. Strauss
Gómez González, Mária de los Ángeles
Halliday, M. A. K
Halliday, M. A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
Halliday, M. A. K. & James R. Martin
Henderson, Eugénie J. A
Mathiessen, Christian
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M., Teruya Kazuhiro & Marvin Lam
Nakajima, Shin’ya & James F. Allan
O’Grady, Gerard
Thompson, Geoff
Thompson, Geoff & Susan Thompson
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Bartlett, Tom & Gerard O’Grady
O’Grady, Gerard
Van Praet, Wout & Gerard O'Grady
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.