Article published in:
English Text Construction
Vol. 2:2 (2009) ► pp. 246264
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Cao, Feng & Guangwei Hu
2014. Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics 66  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, John
2014.  In Dialogicity in Written Specialised Genres [Dialogue Studies, 23],  pp. ix ff. Crossref logo
Flowerdew, Lynne
2020. The Academic Literacies approach to scholarly writing: a view through the lens of the ESP/Genre approach. Studies in Higher Education 45:3  pp. 579 ff. Crossref logo
Huang, Ying & Kate Rose
2018. You, our shareholders: metadiscourse in CEO letters from Chinese and Western banks. Text & Talk 38:2  pp. 167 ff. Crossref logo
Lu, Yuan
2019. L2 distribution of Chinese connectives: Towards a comprehensive understanding of a discourse grammar. Second Language Research 35:4  pp. 557 ff. Crossref logo
Mur-Dueñas, Pilar
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 277 ff. Crossref logo
Murillo, Silvia
2018.  In Intercultural Perspectives on Research Writing [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 18],  pp. 237 ff. Crossref logo
Peterlin, Agnes Pisanski
2016. Engagement markers in translated academic texts. English Text Construction 9:2  pp. 268 ff. Crossref logo
Povolná, Renata
2020.  In Persuasion in Specialised Discourses,  pp. 229 ff. Crossref logo
Rørvik, Sylvi
2017.  In Cross-linguistic Correspondences [Studies in Language Companion Series, 191],  pp. 271 ff. Crossref logo
Sheldon, Dr Elena
2019. Knowledge construction of discussion/conclusion sections of research articles written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 37  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Sheldon, Elena
2011. Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 10:4  pp. 238 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.